A strong argument is a view that is supported by solid facts and reasoning, while a weak argument follows from poor reasoning and inaccurate information. Strong arguments must be supported by reputable sources or they risk being invalidated by others. Weak arguments contain problems with the logic used to support them.
The information that supports a strong argument should be plausible and proven, and an argument that contains false premises is never considered a good one. Weak arguments usually have poor wording, inaccurate information and jump to illogical conclusions. Under careful examination, a poor argument crumbles. Those who provide only sound arguments to support their views are often seen as intelligent, but those who state very weak arguments are often ignored. Presenting one sound argument to an audience is better than offering a series of weak arguments.
A strong argument remains more credible than a weak one, and a strong argument is preferred in most situations. When attempting to persuade someone of a particular viewpoint, a strong argument is usually necessary. In a laid-back social setting, a weak argument may attract some support and approval. In an academic environment, strong arguments can be used to define a person’s position and support research, but a weak argument loses support and credibility.