Q:

What is the difference between deontology and utilitarianism?

A:

Quick Answer

The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important. Deontology deals with intentions and motives. Utilitarianism focuses only on results.

Continue Reading

Full Answer

Advocates of utilitarianism believe that all actions must seek to produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. This applies even if an act harms an innocent person. For example, if a surgeon has the chance to save three lives by harvesting the organs of a healthy person, utilitarian theory suggests that harming the healthy person is acceptable to save a greater number of lives.

By contrast, deontology focuses on the moral aspects of any action, not its consequences. This philosophy believes that some acts are always wrong, regardless of the consequences. Deontologists find lying to be unacceptable, for example, even when someone lies in order to bring about a desirable result.

Both of these systems have weaknesses. For instance, critics charge that utilitarianism justifies enslaving a small group of people in order to help a larger group. Critics of deontology point out that its rigidity does not allow for exceptional cases where a morally dubious action avoids causing harm to others.

Learn more about Social Sciences

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What is social ramification?

    A:

    Social ramification refers to the consequences of actions in a social setting, toward a particular culture or a change in a person's social status. For example, if a person is rude at a cocktail party, he may not be accepted in a social circle because of his behavior.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Why are stereotypes harmful?

    A:

    One of the main reasons why stereotypes are harmful is because they can lead to errors in decision making that carry the potential for negative consequences. What are viewed as stereotypical traits in people can be significantly overestimated and result in discriminatory biases that affect legal, employment-based and interactive decision-making. Harmful and inaccurate biases can result from focusing on recollections of negative reactions on those founded on positive or objective recall and lead to stereotyping that is based in greater part on conveniently validating preexisting prejudices.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the Thomas theorem of sociology?

    A:

    The Thomas theorem of sociology states "If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences," according to the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online. The objective reality of a situation doesn't matter as much as someone's perception of what someone believes is happening. Sociologist W.I. Thomas published his theorem in 1928.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the consequences of cultism?

    A:

    The consequences of cultism include decreased morale, a need for substances and incarceration of individuals who were involved in the cult. The cults can greatly affect populations and can cause seemingly innocent people to become tangled up in criminal activities that are performed as parts of cult rituals.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore