The primary arguments in favor of animal rights center around the protection of animals and prevention of pain. People against animal rights argue that full rights for animals would prevent humans from even using animals that are treated humanely. This often focuses on the ability to eat meat.Continue Reading
The most ardent animal rights supporters believe that animals should not be confined or used by humans for any purpose. This is distinct from animal welfare, which allows humans to use animals but demands humane treatment.
The animal rights position guarantees that no animals are mistreated or abused. It prevents humans from killing animals for meat, clothing or manufacturing materials. Many people believe that animals are equal to humans in sentience and feeling, so granting them rights is respecting their inherent worth.
The cons of the animal rights argument center on the fact that animal products save lives. Some people cannot live on a vegan diet. Animals are used in medical research and animal products are the basis of some medications.
Working animals such as service dogs and even household pets are considered unethical by some animal rights supporters. Granting animals rights in law would also have a strong economic impact, with many farmers, veterinarians, medical researchers and other workers losing income.
The position of non-interference in animals' lives may also cause additional suffering for wild animals, because habitat encroachment sometimes requires management strategies, such as birth control and extra feed during the winter.Learn more about Ethics
According to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training Center, two of the largest arguments for life support are that it assists in sustaining life for an indefinite period of time and that it goes against many people's moral codes to allow someone to die. Two arguments against the utilization of life support are that the apparatus drains energy resources and that it is unethical to prolong life without consent.Full Answer >
One of the arguments against trying juveniles as adults is that adult prison exposes young offenders to the negative influence of being incarcerated with older and hardened criminals. Supporters of trying juveniles as adults point out that there have been horrendous crimes committed by what have been referred to as "juvenile super predators," and that if an offender is "old enough to do the crime," then they are also "old enough to do the time." In the majority of states in the United States, juveniles can be tried as adults for serious crimes such as gang-related acts and murder.Full Answer >
Some arguments for school dress codes state that the practice promotes equality between male and female students and those from different economic backgrounds, improves the overall safety in schools and takes away outside distractions from the classroom, according to Fresno Pacific University. Opposing perspectives argue that guidelines on dress oppress individualism in students and do not offer a solution to larger issues involving violence and preparing students for the workforce.Full Answer >
Some positive aspects of ventilating home crawlspaces are prevention of the formation of high moisture that results in mold, mildew, fungus or rot on wooden structures in the crawlspace and the avoidance of pest problems. However, negative aspects of ventilating crawlspaces include increased energy costs and the fact that ventilation does not always solve moisture problems. Improperly constructed crawlspaces can negatively affect the comfort and energy efficiency of homes.Full Answer >