Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaw_v._Reno

Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering.The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1992/92-357

Janet Reno for the Civil Rights Division, interposed a formal objection to the General Assembly's plan Facts of the case The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district.

legaldictionary.net/shaw-v-reno

Case Summary of Shaw v. Reno: The State of North Carolina, in response to the U.S. Attorney General’s objection that it had only one majority-black congressional district, created a second majority-black district.

www.casebriefs.com/.../equal-protection/shaw-v-reno-shaw-i

Shaw v. Reno [Shaw I] Search. Table of Contents. Constitutional Law Keyed to Chemerinsky. Add to Library. Law Dictionary. CASE BRIEFS. Law Dictionary ... Brief Fact Summary. The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) held that the Appellants, Shaw and others (Appellants), have a legitimate claim that North Carolina’s redistricting ...

www.reference.com/government-politics/shaw-v-reno-case-a96...

The Shaw v. Reno case examined whether or not there was equal protection in a district within North Carolina. It was decided, 5-4, that there was not equal protection; redistricting that had taken place was done through unacceptable racial gerrymandering, according to the Chicago-Kent College of Law.

www.quimbee.com/cases/shaw-v-reno

Shaw v. Reno. United States Supreme Court 509 U.S. 630 (1993) ... winding through the I-85 corridor, crossing 10 counties, and dividing towns. Shaw and several North Carolina residents (plaintiffs) challenged the redistricting plan in federal district court, arguing that the plan was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. ... A summary of the ...

roseinstitute.org/redistricting/shaw

Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993) Case Summary . North Carolina’s first redistricting plan following the 1990 Census was rejected because it had created only one minority-majority district, while in the judgment of the US Attorney General, there could have been two.

www.casebriefs.com/.../equal-protection/shaw-v-reno-shaw-i/2

Citation. 509 U.S. 630, 113 S. Ct. 2816, 125 L. Ed. 2d 511, 1993 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) held that. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: ... Shaw v. Reno [Shaw I] Search. Table of Contents. Constitutional Law Keyed to Chemerinsky. Add to Library. Law ...

store.streetlaw.org/shaw-v-reno-1993

Hi, we're Street Law. Since 1972, we've been hard at work in communities and schools across the country and around the globe, developing programs and teaching materials that educate people about law and government. We believe that when people have the knowledge, skills, and confidence to understand how law and government work, to advocate effectively for themselves and others, and to ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/509/630.html

United States Supreme Court SHAW v. RENO(1993) No. 92-357 Argued: April 20, 1993 Decided: June 28, 1993. To comply with 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 - which prohibits a covered jurisdiction from implementing changes in a "standard, practice, or procedure with respect to voting" without federal authorization - North Carolina submitted to the Attorney General a congressional ...