Start studying Shaw v. Reno. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Start studying Shaw v. Reno Supreme Court Case. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Start studying Important Supreme Court Cases (AP Gov). Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Start a free trial of Quizlet Plus by Thanksgiving | Lock in 50% off all year Try it free. Ends in 03d 07h 12m 09s. Search. Browse. Create. ... Shaw v Reno (1993) ...
Shaw v Reno 1993. Background information about the case including a description of the conflict or problem. Note what government action was being reviewed. The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district. North Carolina submitted a second plan ...
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering.The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be ...
Shaw v. Reno Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: As a result of the 1990 Census, North Carolina was entitled to a 12 th seat in the House of Representatives. Accordingly, the State devised a redistricting plan that created one majority-black district.
Start studying AP Government--Court Cases. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) AP Gov: CON‑3.C.1 (EK) Google Classroom Facebook Twitter. Email. Congressional behavior. Representatives as delegates, trustees, and politicos. Gerrymandering. Baker v. Carr. Shaw v. Reno (1993) This is the currently selected item. Divided government and gridlock in the United States.
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993) Case Summary . North Carolina’s first redistricting plan following the 1990 Census was rejected because it had created only one minority-majority district, while in the judgment of the US Attorney General, there could have been two.