Web Results

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/283us697

In a Minneapolis newspaper called The Saturday Press, Jay Near and Howard Guilford accused local officials of being implicated with gangsters. Minnesota officials sought a permanent injunction against The Saturday Press on the grounds that it violated the Public Nuisance Law because it was malicious, scandalous, and defamatory.

www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1929/1929_91

Oyez, 12 Apr. 2019, www.oyez.org/cases/1929/91. Report an error

billofrightsinstitute.org/.../near-v-minnesota-1931

Near v. Minnesota (1931) Summary This Landmark Supreme Court Cases and the Constitution eLesson focuses on the 1931 Supreme Court case Near v. Minnesota. In this landmark freedom of the press case, the Court struck down a state law allowing prior restraint (government censorship in advance) as unconstitutional. In so ruling, the Court applied the […]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota

Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that found that prior restraints on publication violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment, a principle that was applied to free speech generally in subsequent jurisprudence.

www.casebriefs.com/.../near-v-minnesota-3

Near v. Minnesota. Search. Table of Contents. Constitutional Law Keyed to Sullivan. Add to Library. Law Dictionary. CASE BRIEFS. Law Dictionary Featuring Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. Search. Print. Note Pad. A A. Font size -+ Reset. Tool box Close Table of Contents. Add to Library.

money.howstuffworks.com/10-supreme-court-cases-journalists...

This case helped the Supreme Court define freedom of the press and the concept of prior restraint. When Minneapolis newspaper editor Jay Near attacked local officials by claiming in print that they were associated with gangsters, Minnesota officials obtained an injunction to keep Near from publishing his paper under state law.

www.casebriefs.com/.../near-v-minnesota-3/2

Near v. Minnesota. Search. Table of Contents. Constitutional Law Keyed to Sullivan. Add to Library. Law Dictionary. CASE BRIEFS. Law Dictionary Featuring Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. Search. Print. Note Pad. A A. Font size -+ Reset. Tool box Close Table of Contents. Add to Library.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/283/697

Near v. Minnesota. No. 91. Argued January 30, 1931. Decided June 1, 1931. 283 U.S. 697. ... Near's answer made no allegations to excuse or justify the business or the articles complained of. It formally denied that the publications were malicious, scandalous or defamatory, admitted that they were made as alleged, and attacked the statute as ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/283/697.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court NEAR v. STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. OLSON. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.reference.com/government-politics/near-vs-minnesota-cd...

Near v. Minnesota was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized the freedom of the press in 1931. In this case the court struck down a Minnesota state law that allowed government censorship, declaring it unconstitutional.