Indian mystic Osho has described subjective art as a private form of expression where the audience is never considered, such as the paintings of Picasso. Objective art aims to bring the observer into a transcendent experience. Like Gurdjieff, Osho says that Eastern art is more likely to be objective than Western art.
An artist could be objective in his thoughts, but that does not, necessarily, translate to his art being objective. The example of the haiku is perfect objectiveness, a certain temple–as a whole–could be objective art, even though it might consist of building blocks of subjective art.
But having been created, an artwork takes on its own, separate life which is objective. It receives art criticism. It enters into art history. It joins a genre, an oeuvre. It becomes a work in a themed exhibition where it represents an idea. All art is subjective in its creation; all art is objective in its public exposure.
To Be Truthful, Art Is Not Subjective. Chun Park Blocked Unblock Follow ... that can be observed in art then ultimately arises from art being a complex system of the more objective elements of art.
That’s Just, Like, Your Opinion, Man: An Argument that Art is Objective. Art is objective. Keep calm, art majors. Your postmodern art is not wasted effort. Hopefully not, anyways. It’s a well-understood fact that art has a degree of subjectivity to it; that is, not everyone will agree on what is and what is not art.
This is objective art. Osho, The Book of Wisdom, Ch 24. But objective art has disappeared from the world because mystics have disappeared from the world. Objective art is possible only when somebody has attained to a higher plane of being; it is created by those who have reached the peak. They can see the peak and they can see the valley both.
Now, see, I started on another tangent there. The point is, art isn't completely subjective. That doesn't mean it's completely objective. Of course taste comes into it. But not every opinion is equally valid or even right. If it's someone's opinion that Watchmen is poorly crafted, they're wrong.
So in totality we can assume that art is subjective. As all people have their own tests,So it is unnecessary to argue on behalf of Objectiveness of art. But wait, If it is true that people have their own perception of art , Then why specific Artistic materials is loved by all. Thus This contradicts the above statement.
Subjective information or writing is based on personal opinions, interpretations, points of view, emotions and judgment. It is often considered ill-suited for scenarios like news reporting or decision making in business or politics. Objective information or analysis is fact-based, measurable and observable.
Subjectivity in Art History and Art Criticism Eleni Gemtou University of Athens, Greece Abstract Art history and art criticism belong in a wider sense to the humanities, whose aim is the interpretation and comprehension of human actions and intellectual work. Both fields draw their basic methodological tools from the hermeneutical tradition.