Web Results


This article or section is in the process of an expansion or major restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section , please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{}} during the active editing session.


Executive agreement, an agreement between the United States and a foreign government that is less formal than a treaty and is not subject to the constitutional requirement for ratification by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. The Constitution of the United States does not specifically give a president the power to conclude executive agreements.


The Torrijos–Carter Treaties (Spanish: Tratados Torrijos-Carter) are two treaties signed by the United States and Panama in Washington, D.C., on September 7, 1977, which superseded the Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty of 1903. The treaties guaranteed that Panama would gain control of the Panama Canal after 1999, ending the control of the canal that the U.S. had exercised since 1903.


Which of the following is true of an executive agreement made between a United States President and another head of state? ... What general stance has the Supreme Court taken toward executive privilege since 1974? ... Making treaties with other nations II. Making executive agreements with other nations III. Appointing ambassadors and judges.


An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding.


The SALT agreements signed on May 27 addressed two major issues. First, they limited the number of antiballistic missile (ABM) sites each country could have to two. (ABMs were missiles designed to ...


Executive agreements are a. not valid in foreign policy matters unless approved by the Senate. b. agreements between the president and a head of foreign government that do not have to be approved by the Senate. c. an unconstitutional expansion of the power of the president. d. binding upon future presidents.


an agreement, made between the president and another country, that has the force of a treaty but does not require the Senate's "advice and consent" Executive Office of the President (EOP) the permanent agencies that perform defined management tasks for the president.


b. inherent executive power claimed by presidents to withhold information from, or to refuse to appear before, Congress or the courts. c. binding international pact that is made between the president and another head of state and that does not require Senate approval. d. formal agreement between the governments of two or more countries.


There is confusion in the media and elsewhere about United States law as it relates to international agreements, including treaties. The confusion exists with respect to such matters as whether "treaty" has the same meaning in international law and in the domestic law of the United States, how treaties are ratified, how the power to enter into international agreements is allocated among ...