As Mark Twain put it, “History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” The vast, vast majority of people don’t in anyway think that history literally, exactly repeats itself. Such would violate celebrated philosophies of free will. When people say that history repeats itself, they are generally thinking of broad patterns.
As Mark Twain put it, history does not repeat itself, but it does occasionally rhyme. Journalists and historians use these parallels between past and present events to better understand or pose questions about current trends and likely futures.
Does History Repeat itself? Evidence From The Course Throughout this course I have learned about many different events in history and the effects these events have had on us today. The contemporary issues have lead me to believe that while the remnants of history still remain, I do not believe history will repeat itself.
Does History Repeat Itself - Evidence In 1945, the Atomic Bomb was dropped to bring about a swift end to the war. The dropping of the bomb killed an estimated 146,000 people in Hiroshima, and 80,000 in Nagasaki. In 2016, the US dropped over 20,000 bombs in the middle east.
"History repeats itself," is typically used in the context that we as humans have a tendency to forget past mistakes and repeat them. It has more to do with describing human nature, believing we are smarter than our predecessors, than science itself. The only thing related with "science" is repeatability of an experiment.
The relationship between the continuities and the discontinuities of history have rarely been better expressed than in Mark Twain’s epigram, “The past does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.” In conclusion, the earliest known evidence of this popular quotation appeared in 1970, but that date is many decades after the death of Mark Twain.
The difference this time was how much bigger and more destructive that war had become since the first World War, which itself was catastrophic. Forgotten lessons. That is usually the way it is when history repeats itself—the second time around is far worse than the first time. But WHY does this redundant cycle of devastation happen?
It appears that there is something wrong with the axiom, “History does not repeat itself: the historians repeat one another.” It would be nearer the truth—without playing for mere epigram—to say that history does repeat itself, and that historians, in repeating each other, make grievous errors.
Applying this to history repeating itself, you can't look at a situation in a way that one has not already looked at before in a similar situation. Surely Einstein did not intend for this sentence to be used this way, but it is true that history does indeed repeat itself.
History repeating itself does not mean that the repeat is an exact copy of the previous starter event. But there are significant similarities between events separated in time.