Web Results


Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering.The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of ...


The Shaw v. Reno case examined whether or not there was equal protection in a district within North Carolina. It was decided, 5-4, that there was not equal protection; redistricting that had taken place was done through unacceptable racial gerrymandering, according to the Chicago-Kent College of Law.


Shaw v. Reno Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: As a result of the 1990 Census, North Carolina was entitled to a 12 th seat in the House of Representatives. Accordingly, the State devised a redistricting plan that created one majority-black district.


A case in which the Court held that the redistricting of North Carolina was evidence of an attempt to separate voters based on race, and thus raised a constitutional issue under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.


We'll hear argument now in No. 92-357, Ruth O. Shaw v. Janet Reno. Mr. Everett. Robinson O. Everett: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: As our complaint seeks to make clear, this case poses the basic issue of how far a legislature may go in seeking to guarantee the election to Congress of persons of a particular race.


Other articles where Shaw v. Reno is discussed: Sandra Day O'Connor: …importance of equal-protection claims (Shaw v. Reno [1993]), declared unconstitutional district boundaries that are “unexplainable on grounds other than race” (Bush v. Vera [1996]), and sided with the Court’s more liberal members in upholding the configuration of a congressional district in North Carolina created on ...


Important Supreme Court Cases (AP Gov) STUDY. PLAY. Smith v Allwright (1944) ... Shaw v Reno (1993) The Court ruled that although it was a legitimate goal for state legislatures to take race into account when they draw electoral districts in order ot increase the voting strength of minorities, they may not make race the sole reason for drawing ...


Shaw v. Reno Shaw v. Reno (1993) AND ITS PROGENY United States Constitution. According to the Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, about its article titled SHAW v.RENO (1993) AND ITS PROGENYNorth Carolina is subject to the preclearance provisions of section 5 of the voting right act of 1965.


Join over 277,000 law students who have used Quimbee to achieve academic success in law school through expert-written outlines, a massive bank of case briefs, engaging video lessons, comprehensive essay practice exams with model answers, and practice questions.


Citation. 509 U.S. 630, 113 S. Ct. 2816, 125 L. Ed. 2d 511, 1993 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) held that the Appellants, Shaw and others (Appellants), have a legitimate claim that North Carolina’s redistricting scheme was so irregular on its face that it could only be viewed as an effort to segregate races for the purposes of voting, without ...