Web Results

www.christiancourier.com/articles/690-is-the-bible...

Is the Bible a historically dependable book? If not, why should one trust it in redemptive matters? The fact is, however, the Scriptures have been demonstrated to be trustworthy in countless details. This week's Question/Answer briefly addresses this issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's "acceptability as a history". This can be extended to the question of the Christian New Testament as an accurate record of the historical Jesus and the Apostolic Age.. Many fields of study span the Bible and history; such fields range from archeology and cultural anthropology to historical linguistics and comparative literat...

www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/history/historical-accuracy...

The Bible’s Historical Accuracy. All History of the Bible Bible Manuscripts Bible Translations Bible Translators The Bible’s Historical Accuracy. ... Is the Bible historically accurate even in minor details? Reasons to Trust the Bible—Fulfilled Prophecy The Bible is filled with predictions, or prophecies. ...

www.debate.org/opinions/is-the-bible-historically-accurate

Bible historically Accurate well look at many scientific facts. For one, till this day proof of roman occupation of Israel is highly evident, but New testament is a message to a better world to be grateful that a man if you would call him a man (Jospeh Flavius) Would perform miracles to save lives of a corrupted people. ...

www.icr.org/biblical-record

The Bible has proven to be more historically and archaeologically accurate than any other ancient book. It has been subjected to the minutest scientific textual analysis possible to humanity and has been proven to be authentic in every way.

www.quora.com/Is-the-Bible-historically-accurate

As far as it is possible to check, the Bible is remarkably accurate historically. That said, there area lot of external circumstances that are not explained or mentioned in the Bible which would have been relevant and expected by a modern history writer.

www.thetrumpet.com/1912-archaeology-proves-bible-history...

T he Bible is the only ancient, well-organized and authentic framework in which to fit all the facts of history. The Bible does not record all history. In fact, there are huge gaps in the history contained in the Bible. Yet, without the Bible and what it reveals from prehistory, ancient history and prophecy—which is history written in advance—you cannot truly understand any history.

kenboa.org/apologetics/how-accurate-is-the-bible

And the multitudes of eyewitnesses who were alive when the New Testament books began to be circulated would have challenged blatant historical fabrications about the life of Christ. The Bible places great stress on accurate historical details, and this is especially obvious in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts, Luke’s two-part masterpiece.

bible.org/article/how-accurate-bible

The Bible places great stress on accurate historical details, and this is especially obvious in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts, Luke's two-part masterpiece (see his prologue in Luke 1:1-4). III. The External Test

www.huffpost.com/entry/the-bible-isnt-history_b_2803409

Some stories in the Bible were meant to be history, others fiction. ... The news can be accurate even if the comics are not. The same is true for the different parts of the Bible. The New Testament similarly offers more than just stories, and, as with the Old Testament, only some of the stories in the New Testament were meant as history. Others ...