Q:

Could the Dust Bowl have been prevented?

A:

Quick Answer

While this was a sensitive topic in its day, many scholars agree that the Dust Bowl could largely have been prevented from happening. Scholars from the University of Illinois agree with the idea that the Dust Bowl tragedy occurred due to a combination of human and ecological factors, meaning it might not have been 100 percent preventable, but its effects could have been less severe with better farming practices.

Continue Reading
Could the Dust Bowl have been prevented?
Credit: Getty Images Archive Photos Getty Images

Full Answer

The Dust Bowl refers to a period during the 1930s during which drought and persistent dust storms (high winds carrying massive clouds of dusts) impacted agriculture and commerce in the American plains states. Much of the area that was impacted by the Dust Bowl was once grassland that had been converted into agricultural space, leading to ecological and landscape changes that, when combined with a prolonged period of severe drought in the region, led to the perfect mix of conditions for widespread, devastating dust storms. The drought was, of course, not in human control, but hindsight on the issue indicates that better farming practices could have dramatically lessened the scale of the disaster.

Learn more about US History

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What are some bowl turning techniques?

    A:

    Bowl turning techniques include roughing the bowl, sealing the bowl to prevent drying and cracking and sanding the bowl. Other techniques include power sanding and applying a finish to the bowl.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What was highest scoring Super Bowl?

    A:

    As of 2015, the Super Bowl with the most points scored by both teams was Super Bowl XXIX in 1995, where the San Francisco 49ers and San Diego Chargers scored a combined 75 points. In Super Bowl XXIV in 1990, the 49ers scored 55 points, the most by one team.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What caused the Panic of 1837?

    A:

    The Panic of 1837 was an period of economic crisis in the United States under President Martin Van Buren; the cause of this financial crisis has been tied to different causes by various scholars, including changes in banking policy at the federal level and a real estate bubble. The real estate bubble resulted from banks extending a large amount of credit to individuals who wanted to develop the newly available land in the West. Although Van Buren served as president during the panic of 1837, his predecessor, Andrew Jackson, arguably was responsible for the events that triggered the crisis because he divested funds from a federal bank and distributed that money to smaller state banks, which had less strict credit policies, leading to the real estate bubble.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Why was Thomas Jefferson a good leader?

    A:

    While Thomas Jefferson is one of the most well-known American presidents, the quality of his leadership is debated by some scholars. Some of Jefferson's greatest attempts as a leader ended in failure, according to the Mises Institute, but his efforts inspired success in future generations.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore