According to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training Center, two of the largest arguments for life support are that it assists in sustaining life for an indefinite period of time and that it goes against many people's moral codes to allow someone to die. Two arguments against the utilization of life support are that the apparatus drains energy resources and that it is unethical to prolong life without consent.Continue Reading
The National Center for Biotechnology Information offers additional arguments for and against the use of life support. Arguments for life support include that it is required regardless of prognosis and that life support can be requested by patients or their personal representatives without any justification necessary. This means that a patient can request to be put on life support even if doctors do not believe that recovery is possible.
The responding arguments against life support note that while life support does sustain life, it does not heal or guarantee an improved quality of life. Additionally, if a personal representative is making the decision for the patient, the decision to sustain life on life support can be made without regard for quality of life. A Frontline report details how many people believe it goes against the ethical code of physicians to allow someone without medical training to make the decision to keep another person on life support.Learn more about Side Effects
Statins lower the risk of heart attack by 54 percent in patients with cardiovascular disease and can lower the risk of stroke by 48 percent, according to Medical News Today. However, statins increase the risk of developing diabetes by 9 percent. There is also a link between statin use and cataracts, increased liver enzymes and fatigue while exercising.Full Answer >
A flu vaccination offers protection from the flu, leads to a milder sickness if a person catches the flu, and reduces risk of hospitalization or death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its possible disadvantage is the lack of benefits if the vaccine does not match circulating viruses.Full Answer >
The primary arguments in favor of animal rights center around the protection of animals and prevention of pain. People against animal rights argue that full rights for animals would prevent humans from even using animals that are treated humanely. This often focuses on the ability to eat meat.Full Answer >
There are different arguments for and against the continued use of the electoral college in elections. Those in favor of the electoral college maintain that it better represents the choices of the nation as a whole and eliminates the need to recount the votes of the entire country, lessening the chances for election fraud.Full Answer >