In 1965, Miranda v. Arizona created a specific set of procedures for police interrogations and evidence, according to the Oyez Project. The case was one of a series involving protections for the accused found in the Fifth Amendment.Continue Reading
According to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Miranda v. Arizona was the defining case for four separate cases that all involved the same Fifth Amendment question. The U.S. Supreme Court decided in favor of Miranda in that the investigating officers violated his Fifth Amendment rights during an interrogation in which the officers used misleading and inaccurate statements to elicit a confession.
According to the Legal Information Institute, the Miranda ruling led to a series of pronouncements and procedures. These included the inadmissibility at trial of statements taken in violation of the Fifth Amendment. A “privilege against self-incrimination” existed through the establishment of a right to remain silent, the right to an attorney for criminal matters and the right for the indigent to have an attorney appointed. The accused also had the right to answer some questions without waiving all Fifth Amendment rights. Further, it was determined that those in custody also needed to be made aware of these rights.
Authorities accused and convicted Ernesto Miranda of sexual assault, according to Jrank. The defendant did not definitively claim that Miranda was her attacker. However, during a closed interrogation, the investigating officers falsely told Miranda that the defendant did identify him. This ended in a signed confession by Miranda.Learn more about Law
About.com explains that the primary outcome of Miranda vs. Arizona (1966) was the creation of "Miranda rights," which must be explained to an individual suspected of a crime before questioning by the authorities. These rights include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney's presence, among others.Full Answer >
The Miranda doctrine, more typically referred to as "Miranda rights," is a set of rights applicable to police detainees under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Miranda rights were established in the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda rights are the basis of police procedure for the detention of suspects.Full Answer >
Some strange laws in Arizona render it illegal to let donkeys sleep in bathtubs, ride a horse up the courthouse stairs, shoot camels and make imitation cocaine, states Dumb Laws, as of 2015. It is illegal to sell moldy green eggs, tamper with petroglyphs in caves or stuff a mattress with waste from a junkyard or dump, states Naegle and Crider PLC. Additional strange laws target wearing red ski masks, stealing soap, wearing suspenders and serving horse meat in restaurants.Full Answer >
One example of an employment law in Arizona is that workers who are not on salary earn time-and-a-half pay when working more than 40 hours in a week, explains Lawyers.com. The legal minimum wage is $7.80 and $4.80 for employees who receive tips, as of 2013. However, if a worker who receives tips does not make at least minimum wage with tips included, the employer is responsible for making up the difference.Full Answer >