One of the arguments against trying juveniles as adults is that adult prison exposes young offenders to the negative influence of being incarcerated with older and hardened criminals. Supporters of trying juveniles as adults point out that there have been horrendous crimes committed by what have been referred to as "juvenile super predators," and that if an offender is "old enough to do the crime," then they are also "old enough to do the time." In the majority of states in the United States, juveniles can be tried as adults for serious crimes such as gang-related acts and murder.Continue Reading
One of the arguments for trying a juvenile offender as an adult is that not doing so is unfair to the offender's victim. It implies that the crime was not serious enough and the victim is unworthy of respect. There is also the concern that the judicial system may be viewed as less punitive if juvenile offenders spend less time than adults do in jail. Some law enforcement officers also point out that they have dealt personally with juveniles who have already reached the status of hardened criminals.
Opponents of trying juveniles as adults claim that the young offenders are less culpable than adults for their actions. Because of their age, these criminals are developmentally less mature, more erratic and susceptible to the influence of negative peer group pressure. The separate juvenile court system is designed to prevent young offenders from being "schooled in crime" and preyed upon by the hardened criminals they would be exposed to in the adult criminal system.Learn more about Legal Ages
There are different arguments for and against the continued use of the electoral college in elections. Those in favor of the electoral college maintain that it better represents the choices of the nation as a whole and eliminates the need to recount the votes of the entire country, lessening the chances for election fraud.Full Answer >
According to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training Center, two of the largest arguments for life support are that it assists in sustaining life for an indefinite period of time and that it goes against many people's moral codes to allow someone to die. Two arguments against the utilization of life support are that the apparatus drains energy resources and that it is unethical to prolong life without consent.Full Answer >
Some arguments for school dress codes state that the practice promotes equality between male and female students and those from different economic backgrounds, improves the overall safety in schools and takes away outside distractions from the classroom, according to Fresno Pacific University. Opposing perspectives argue that guidelines on dress oppress individualism in students and do not offer a solution to larger issues involving violence and preparing students for the workforce.Full Answer >
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that adults over age 60 get the shingles vaccine, with exceptions for individuals who have allergies to components of the vaccine, have a weakened immune system, or are or may become pregnant. Side effects of the vaccine are mild.Full Answer >