Q:

What are the pros and cons of the three strikes law?

A:

Quick Answer

The pros of a three strikes law include harsher punishments for career criminals and better piece of mind for citizens, while the cons of the three strikes law include overcrowding prison systems and higher costs for prisons and courts. The law was introduced in California in the 1990s, but since then 23 states have adopted the law that places third-time offenders in prison for 25 years to life and federal government has even made connection with the law.

Continue Reading

Full Answer

The three strikes law offers harsh punishments for career criminals and reduces the crime rate due to those punishments. The law is used as a preventive measure to alter the habits of a career criminal and create a better focus for police officers to do their jobs, as well as better peace of mind for citizens due to the lowered crime rate.

With so many criminals behind bars for 25 years to life, the cost to the courts and the prison system increases by up to 50 percent. The prisons become overcrowded which could lead to the release of other criminals not on the three strike rule. With higher costs to the court systems and prisons, there would likely be cuts to law enforcement officials, leaving less police officers on the street. The largest negative of the three strikes law is that is does not exempt certain crimes, meaning a shoplifter could potentially live the rest of their life in prison next to a murderer or rapist.

Learn more about Crime
Sources:

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What are some pros and cons of the death penalty?

    A:

    Many advocates of the death penalty believe that morality requires the death penalty for heinous crimes, that the practice is constitutional and it deters crime, while opponents often argue that it is too costly financially, it does not deter crime and too many innocent people are executed. Many opponents also argue that it is disproportionately applied to poor people, while advocates often claim that is a myth.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of forensic science?

    A:

    Some pros of forensic science are that it provides evidence that can be used to help convict criminals and overturn wrongful convictions, but it can also be costly and time consuming to process the evidence. Even when there is some type of forensic evidence, it is possible for the evidence to be processed incorrectly, yielding an inaccurate result.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are some of the pros and cons of trying juveniles as adults?

    A:

    One of the arguments against trying juveniles as adults is that adult prison exposes young offenders to the negative influence of being incarcerated with older and hardened criminals. Supporters of trying juveniles as adults point out that there have been horrendous crimes committed by what have been referred to as "juvenile super predators," and that if an offender is "old enough to do the crime," then they are also "old enough to do the time." In the majority of states in the United States, juveniles can be tried as adults for serious crimes such as gang-related acts and murder.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of prison rehabilitation?

    A:

    The positives of prison rehabilitation are education and psychiatric treatment. The negatives of prison rehabilitation are deeper involvement in crimes and learning of new crime methods.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore