Aristocracy can be seen in both a positive and negative light since it can be considered a pro to allow the most educated people in a nation to make the biggest decisions regarding that nation, yet it can be considered a con to allow a few people to make important decisions for an entire people. In today's democratic world, the term aristocracy is typically considered negative because it often means that a small, wealthy portion of the population is controlling the entire nation, leading to a disparity in individual rights.Continue Reading
Aristocracy is a type of government where only a small minority rules based on the idea that this small minority is made up of those who are most qualified to rule. It is similar to a monarchy style of government because many monarchies were ruled by the aristocrats who lived in them as well as the King, Queen or Emperor of the monarchy.
The Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle were the first to imagine an aristocracy and create one. These two philosophers believed that the best of their age should be placed into the ruling class and therefore rule the rest of the population. These people must be morally and intellectually superior than the rest of the population. While the idea had positive moments, it was not practical because it was difficult to judge who was the "best of the age" because the best is subjective.Learn more about Types of Government
A pro of imperialism is it that it can modernize other nations. A con of imperialism is that it has led to the murder of millions of people throughout history.Full Answer >
A theocracy provides a more obedient general public and offers rapid changes, but on the downside it does not give citizens an opinion on many issues. A theocracy is a type of government where there is not a separation between church and state. Religious beliefs and leaders govern the people and shape the local laws.Full Answer >
Pros of a representative democracy include efficiency, and officials that are democratically elected; cons include elected officials not being held accountable for their actions and citizens cannot participate in this type of democracy. The United Kingdom and the United States both have a representative democracy.Full Answer >
A direct democracy permits citizens to directly vote on legislation rather than voting for a representative who takes on the task himself. Because the decision making process is left to the people, this form of governmental rule is seen as more equitable and less arbitrary. De-centralization is another advantage of using this type of process. However, using a direct system can result in voter fraud or the exploitation of minorities.Full Answer >