Q:

What was the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case?

A:

Quick Answer

In the Marbury v. Madison case, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of William Marbury's argument, but his commission was still denied because the court lacked the power to issue a writ of mandamus. The court ruled that President Thomas Jefferson, through his Secretary of State James Madison, was wrong to prohibit Marbury from becoming the Justice of the Peace of Washington County in the District of Columbia.

Continue Reading
What was the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison case?
Credit: CZQS2000 / STS Photodisc Getty Images

Full Answer

On February 24, 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice John Marshall, confirmed the principle of judicial review, the power of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional authority by voiding and declaring legislation as unconstitutional. This principle was first applied in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison.

Jefferson ordered Madison not to deliver the commission of Marbury, who was appointed by John Adams. Marbury sued Madison and petitioned the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus, which was a legal order compelling Madison to show cause why Marbury's commission was denied. Although the court decided that Marbury's appointment was in accordance with established laws, it also ruled that it lacked the jurisdiction to order Jefferson and Madison to seat Marbury.

The decision of Chief Justice Marshall has been hailed as a pivotal turn in the judiciary system. It was considered a judicial triumph that made the Supreme Court equal in power to the U.S. president and Congress.

Learn more about Branches of Government

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What is a brief summary of the Madison v. Marbury case?

    A:

    In Marbury v. Madison, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a court can declare an act of Congress void when it conflicts with the Constitution, according to the Legal Information Institute. The decision makes the Court the final arbiter of the constitutionality of congressional legislation.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What was the importance of Marbury v. Madison?

    A:

    In 1803, Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, according to the Oyez Project. Judicial review gave the Supreme Court power to overrule acts of legislation or executive orders that were contradictory to the Constitution. The Constitution was supreme over acts of the executive and legislative branches.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    How did the case Marbury vs. Madison change the Supreme Court?

    A:

    The Marbury vs. Madison decision of 1803 set the precedent that the court could nullify an act of Congress if it was found to be inconsistent with the Constitution. This ruling formed the basis of judicial review and established the separation of the executive and judicial branches.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    How did John Marshall affect the Supreme Court?

    A:

    According to the National Archives, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison. His decision expanded the powers of the Supreme Court by establishing its right to overturn acts by the president, Congress and states if the acts violated the Constitution. With this decision, Chief Justice Marshall added judicial review to the governmental system of "checks and balances."

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore