The difference between an authoritarian government and a totalitarian government is not entirely known, since even theorists disagree about the two. However, both forms of government use force and often fear to control, with totalitarian governments controlling every aspect of people's lives in a way that authoritarian governments sometimes do not. Totalitarian governments will also try to create a cult around their leader, and the leader will often display charisma in addition to a push for loyalty, force, brutality and fear.Continue Reading
One example of totalitarian government control was the Pol Pot regime. From 1976 to 1978, Pol Pot ruled over the Khmer Rouge region in Cambodia. Although he ran his political campaign on socialism, he was a true totalitarian. He used force to remove citizens from the cities and to put them on communal farms. These citizens were then forced to work and to be a part of a new communist society. If anyone disobeyed and refused to go, then they were not only tortured, but often murdered.
An example of an authoritarian government can be seen in China. However, it is a thriving country in many ways, and belongs to the World Trade Organization. China is also seen as a major international force in politics and economy.Learn more about Types of Government
A presidential system of democracy is based on the separation of powers between three branches of government: judicial, legislative and executive. The United States originated the use of a presidential system, and only a few other democracies follow the format.Full Answer >
A centrally planned economy is characterized as an economic system in which the government dictates and regulates all areas of economic activity, such as trade, labor, distribution, production and health care. A centrally planned economy is also known as a command economy.Full Answer >
The principle of popular sovereignty is a method used in the 19th century, which states that the people of a given area create and sustain the power of their government through the representatives the people elect. This was enacted during the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, and it was a compromise on the slavery issue that was paramount at the time.Full Answer >
The divine right theory of government posits that a ruling authority, such as a monarch, derives power directly from God. As a result, the king is not answerable to the aristocracy, the church, the people or anyone else.Full Answer >