In 2007, Bristol Myers-Squibb, the manufacturer of Abilify, settled a class-action lawsuit where it was charged with illegally marketing off-label use of the drug. The company was also accused of offering doctors kickbacks in the form of money and trips if they prescribed the drug to patients for whom it was not meant.Continue Reading
As of 2014, other lawsuits are pending due to compulsive behavior presented in patients who were prescribed the drug. Compulsive gambling, sex addictions and other compulsive behaviors go away when patients stop taking Abilify.
Abilify is a member of the atypical antipsychotic class of drugs. It was created in 2002 to treat schizophrenia. Two years later, it was approved as a treatment for bipolar disorder, and in 2007, use of the drug to treat depression was approved. The drug works by altering the dopamine and serotonin levels in the brain.
The Food and Drug Administration sent additional warnings about potential side effects that were not on the label and asked Bristol Myers-Squibb to add them to the label. These side effects included a lower resistance to diabetes and hyperglycemia, sudden death in the elderly, suicidal tendencies in younger people and withdrawal symptoms in newborns of mothers who were on the drug during pregnancy.Learn more about Law
As of 2015, grounds for a lawsuit under the provisions of the Family Medical Leave Act include an employer's refusal to give an employee time off or a reduced workload, and any retaliatory action against an employee who utilizes the act to take a leave from work, according to The Wall Street Journal. An employee must prove that an employer interrupted or disallowed an authorized leave.Full Answer >
A tort is an incident in which someone intentionally injures a person and their property and can result in a private lawsuit; a crime is a criminal action that the state prosecutes on the victim's behalf, according to the University of New Mexico. Although crimes are torts because of the resultant action on the victim, many torts are civil matters and therefore are not crimes.Full Answer >
The Pigford v. Glickman class action lawsuit claimed that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had discriminated against African-American farmers in awarding disaster relief, support loans and other government funding, according to Snopes.com. The initial lawsuit was filed by Timothy Pigford in 1997, and it eventually resulted in settlements for over 15,000 claimants.Full Answer >
The United States Department of Agriculture Black Farmer Settlement, which awarded over $1.2 billion to thousands of minority farmers, was a result of the verdict in the class action Pigford versus Glickman lawsuit that alleged minority farmers were unfairly denied farm loans and assistance by the agency between 1981 and 1996. The original settlement paid about $1 billion to 15,640 claimants but was expanded to allow those that missed the original claim filing deadline.Full Answer >