The Danielson Group evaluates teachers using value added test scores of two principal indicators: the effect of a teacher's approach on student learning rates and the individual's teaching practices. The Danielson Group admits that there are imperfections in the use of value added test scores for individual teacher evaluation.Continue Reading
The Danielson Group further separates these two indicators of teacher effectiveness into four domains. The first domain is preparation and planning, through which the organization determines how effective a teacher's approach to lesson planning is. The second and third domains are designed to describe the classroom environment; the Danielson Group assesses these domains through direct observation of the teacher in the classroom and supplements those observations with student work samples when possible.
The fourth domain for indicating teacher effectiveness is through the teacher's commitment to professional responsibilities. This particular domain cannot be directly observed in the classroom since most of the important evidence for a successful approach happens outside the classroom. The Danielson Group suggests that the fourth domain be assessed annually through the examination of individual artifacts that illustrate the teacher's commitment and skill. An important element of the way the Danielson Group evaluates teachers is the fact that the company uses evaluators who are not experts in the subject being taught.Learn more about Career Aspirations