Arguments for and Against Genetic Engineering

The arguments for and against genetic engineering are varied. Proponents of genetic engineering cite the multitude of medical technologies which can arise out of these endeavors. If scientists can find and modify the genes for certain diseases like cancer, they could potentially cure those diseases by preventing or amplifying the expression of certain genes. It is speculated that with genetic .

The debate over the moral and ethical use of genetic engineering is one that is filled with strong points and opinions on both sides of the argument. For some, the debate is more of a religious one than one that is decided on its own merits. For others, religion and its trappings do not come into play and they argue about its inclusion into the discussion. What is known for certain is that no matter what side of the argument a person stands on, they do not stand alone.The argument against the use of genetic engineering presents many strong points to consider. Many fear that those in power are going to use this as a way to get rid of the weaker or less desirable in society; think Hitler. They also argue that by engineering a genetically superior human, they essentially take away the drive that the individual has in making his or her own destiny; if everyone is superior and can do anything, then there is no need to excel or aspire for anything more. Those against the use of genetic engineering believe that the beauty of the world they live in now embraces the very things that makes everyone different, championing those at a disadvantage that strive for more and essentially giving them a reason for which to live.On the other side of the coin are those that argue for the use of genetic engineering. Their arguments are solid, lending strength to their cause and opinions. For them, the use of genetic engineering ensures that everyone is given a life free from disease and illness. It essentially diminishes the pain and suffering of those afflicted with incurable diseases or debilitating conditions that make it impossible for them to live a normal life. A society filled with healthy people means a better, happier existence for all.The argument for both sides have effectively divided the nation, and world, as a whole. This debate is not likely to die down anytime soon, and with good reason; when free will and life as it is known is at stake, everyone affected must get involved.