Mineral wool, also known as mineral fibers or man-made mineral fibers are fibers made from natural or synthetic minerals or metal oxides. The latter term is generally used to refer solely to synthetic materials including fiberglass, ceramic fibers and rock or stone wool. Industrial applications of mineral wool include is thermal insulation and filtration.
Mineral wools are unattractive to rodents but will provide a structure for bacterial growth if allowed to become wet.
Other uses are in resin bonded panels, growth medium in hydroponics, filler in compounds for gaskets, brake pads, in plastics in the automotive industry and as a filtering medium.
Mineral fibers are produced in the same way, without binder. The fiber as such is used as a raw material for its reinforcing purposes in various applications, such as friction materials, gaskets, plastics and coatings.
High bio soluble fibers (HT-fibers) are produced that do not cause damage to the human cell. IARC (the International Agency for Research on Cancer) has reviewed the carcinogenicity of man made mineral fibers in October 2002. These newer biosoluble materials have been tested for carcinogenicity and most are found to be non-carcinogenic, or to cause tumors in experimental animals only under very restricted conditions of exposure. The IARC Monographs working group concluded that only the more biopersistent materials remain classified by IARC as possible human carcinogens (Group 2B). These include refractory ceramic fibers, which are used industrially as insulation in high-temperature environments such as blast furnaces, and certain special-purpose glass wools not used as insulating materials. In contrast, the more commonly used vitreous fiber wools including insulation glass wool, rock (stone) wool and slag wool are considered not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).
The EU risk and safety phrases associated with this material in general are:
All European produced rock (stone)wool and glass wool is bio soluble and R39 and R40 do not apply. For these products only the risk phrase R38 remains. This irritation to the skin however is not a chemical irritation but only a temporal mechanical irritation, comparable with exposure of the skin to straw, grass or hay.
Controversy exists over these rulings, as the majority of test results upon which they are based have typically been provided by the industry that makes the fibers. Test results that contravene such results were deemed inadmissible to IARC as submission by whistleblowers are not sanctioned by the party paying for the tests. Still by following common sense and industrial guidelines to prevent breathing of the fibers, it is possible to reduce the likelihood of pathology.