Lift (force)

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Cite This Source

The lift force, lifting force or simply lift is a mechanical force generated by solid objects as they move through a fluid.

While many types of objects can generate lift, the most common and familiar object in this category is the airfoil, a relatively flat object of which the common airplane wing is an example. For the sake of simplicity, this article will discuss lift primarily in the context of airfoils and wings.

Overview

Lift is the sum of all the fluid dynamic forces on a body perpendicular to the direction of the external flow approaching that body. The mathematical equations describing lift have been well established since the Wright Brothers experimentally determined a reasonably precise value for the "Smeaton coefficient" more than 100 years ago, but the practical explanation of what those equations mean is still controversial, with persistent misinformation and pervasive misunderstanding.

Sometimes the term dynamic lift or dynamic lifting force is used for the perpendicular force resulting from motion of the body in the fluid, as in an aerodyne, in contrast to the static lifting force resulting from buoyancy, as in an aerostat. Lift is commonly associated with the wing of an aircraft. However there are many other examples of lift such as propellers on both aircraft and boats, rotors on helicopters, sails and keels on sailboats, hydrofoils, wings on auto racing cars, and wind turbines. While the common meaning of the term "lift#English" suggests an upward action, the lift force is not necessarily directed up with respect to gravity.

Physical explanation

Lift is generated when an object turns a fluid away from its direction of flow. When the object and fluid move relative to each other and the object turns the fluid flow in a direction perpendicular to that flow, the force required to do this creates an equal and opposite force that is lift. The object may be moving through a stationary fluid, or the fluid may be flowing past a stationary object— these two are effectively identical as, in principle, it is only the frame of reference of the viewer which differs.

The lift generated by an airfoil depends on such factors as the speed of the airflow, the density of the air, the total area of the airfoil, and the angle of attack. The angle of attack is the angle at which the airfoil meets the oncoming airflow (or vice versa). A symmetric airfoil must have a positive angle of attack to generate positive lift. At a zero angle of attack, no lift is generated. At a negative angle of attack, negative lift is generated. A cambered airfoil may produce positive lift at zero, or even small negative angles of attack.

The basic concept of lift is simple. However, the details of how the relative movement of air and airfoil interact to produce the turning action that generates lift are complex. Below are several explanations of lift, all of which are different but equivalent descriptions of the same phenomenon from different viewpoints.

Reaction due to deflection

Lift is created and the fluid flow is deflected by an airfoil or other body. The force causing this acceleration of the fluid and the equal and opposite force of lift comply with Newton's third law of motion. It should be noted that these forces are coincidental, they are caused by the same thing but are not caused by each other. Air deflected downward by an aircraft wing, or helicopter rotor, is known as downwash.

It is important to note that the acceleration of air flowing over an aircraft wing does not just involve the air molecules "bouncing off" the lower surface. Rather the air follows both the top and bottom surfaces and is deflected downward both above and below the wing. The acceleration of the air during the creation of lift can also be described as a "turning" of the airflow.

Many shapes, such as a flat plate set at an angle to the flow, will produce lift. This can be demonstrated simply by holding a sheet of paper at an angle in front of you as you move forward, or holding your hand out of the car window. Without any assistance from you, the sheet of paper or your hand will rise in the air. However, lift generation by most shapes will be very inefficient and create a great deal of drag. One of the primary goals of airfoil design is to devise a shape that produces the most lift while producing the least form drag.

It is possible to measure lift using the reaction model. The force acting on the wing is the negative of the time-rate-of-change of the momentum of the air. In a wind tunnel, the speed and direction of the air can be measured (using, for example, a Pitot tube or Laser Doppler velocimetry) and the lift calculated. Alternately, the force on the wind tunnel itself can be measured as the equal and opposite forces to those acting on the test object.

Force caused by pressure gradients

In any case causing lift; an angled flat plate, revolving cylinder, airfoil, etc... Flow meeting the leading edge of the object is forced to split, over and under the object. The sudden change in direction over the object, causes an area of low pressure to form behind the leading edge on the upper surface of the object. In turn, due to this pressure gradient and the viscosity of the fluid, the flow over the object is accelerated down along the upper surface of the object. At the same time the flow forced under the object is rapidly slowed or stagnated, causing an area of high pressure. This also causes the flow to accelerate along the upper surface of the object. The two sections of the fluid each leave the trailing edge of the object with a downward component of momentum, producing lift.

Mathematical Models of Lift

Lift coefficient

The lift coefficient is a dimensionless number. When the lift coefficient is known, for instance from tables of airfoil data, lift can be calculated using the Lift Equation:

C_L = frac{F_L}{frac{1}{2} rho v^2 A}

where:

  • C_L is the lift coefficient
  • rho is the density of the fluid (1.225 kg/m³ for air at sea level*, 1000 kg/m³ for fresh water)
  • v is the freestream velocity, that is the speed of the lifting surface relative to the atmosphere far enough away to be unaffected by the surface
  • A is the projected (planform) surface area of the lifting surface
  • F_L is the lift force produced

This equation can be used in any consistent system. For instance, if the density is measured in kilograms per cubic metre, the velocity is measured in metres per second, and the area is measured in square metres, the lift will be calculated in newtons. Or, if the density is in slugs per cubic foot, the velocity is in feet per second, and the area is in square feet, the resulting lift will be in pounds force.

* Note that at altitudes other than sea level, the density can be found using the barometric formula

Compare with: Drag equation.

Bernoulli's principle

The force on the wing can also be examined in terms of the pressure differences above and below the wing, which can be related to velocity changes by Bernoulli's principle.

The total Lift force is the integral of vertical pressure forces over the entire wetted surface area of the wing:

L = oint pmathbf{n} cdotmathbf{k} ; dA

where:

  • L is the Lift,
  • A is the wing surface area
  • p is the value of the pressure,
  • mathbf{n} is the normal unit vector pointing into the wing
  • mathbf{k} is the vertical unit vector, normal to the freestream direction

The above lift equation neglects the Skin friction forces, which typically have a negligible contribution to the lift compared to the pressure forces. By using the streamwise vector mathbf{i} parallel to the freestream in place of mathbf{k} in the integral, we obtain an expression for the Pressure Drag D_p (which includes Induced Drag in a 3D wing). If we use the spanwise vector mathbf{j}, we obtain the Sideforce Y.

D_p!= oint pmathbf{n} cdotmathbf{i} ; dA

Y ; = oint pmathbf{n} cdotmathbf{j} ; dA

One method for calculating the pressure is Bernoulli's equation, which is the mathematical expression of Bernoulli's principle. This method ignores the effects of viscosity, which can be important in the boundary layer and to predict friction drag, which is the other component of the total drag in addition to D_p.

The Bernoulli principle states that the sum total of energy within a parcel of fluid remains constant as long as no energy is added or removed. It is a statement of the principle of the conservation of energy applied to flowing fluids. A substantial simplification of this proposes that as other forms of energy changes are inconsequential during the flow of air around a wing and that energy transfer in/out of the air is not significant, then the sum of pressure energy and speed energy for any particular parcel of air must be constant. Consequently, an increase in speed must be accompanied by a decrease in pressure and vice-versa. It should be noted that this is not a causational relationship. Rather, it is a coincidental relationship, whatever causes one must also cause the other as energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It is named for the Dutch-Swiss mathematician and scientist Daniel Bernoulli, though it was previously understood by Leonhard Euler and others.

Bernoulli's principle provides an explanation of pressure difference in the absence of air density and temperature variation (a common approximation for low-speed aircraft). If the air density and temperature are the same above and below a wing, a naive application of the ideal gas law requires that the pressure also be the same. Bernoulli's principle, by including air velocity, explains this pressure difference. The principle does not, however, specify the air velocity. This must come from another source, e.g., experimental data. Erroneous assumptions concerning velocity, e.g., that two parcels of air separated at the front of the wing must meet up again at the back of the wing, are commonly found.

In order to solve for the velocity of inviscid flow around a wing, the Kutta condition must be applied to simulate the effects of inertia and viscosity. The Kutta condition allows for the correct choice among an infinite number of flow solutions that otherwise obey the laws of conservation of mass and conservation of momentum.

Circulation

A third way to calculate lift is to determine the mathematical quantity called circulation; (this concept is sometimes applied approximately to wings of large aspect ratio as "lifting-line theory"). Again, it is mathematically equivalent to the two explanations above. It is often used by practicing aerodynamicists as a convenient quantity in calculations, see thin-airfoil theory for example.

The circulation is the line integral of the velocity of the air, in a closed loop around the boundary of an airfoil. It can be understood as the total amount of "spinning" (or vorticity) of air around the airfoil. When the circulation is known, the section lift/span L' can be calculated using the following equation:

L' = rho V Gamma

where rho is the air density, V is the free-stream airspeed, and Gamma is the circulation. This is sometimes known as the Kutta-Joukowski Theorem.

A similar equation applies to the sideways force generated around a spinning object, the Magnus effect, though here the necessary circulation is induced by the mechanical rotation acting on the boundary layer, causing it to separate at different points between top and bottom. The asymmetric separation then produces a circulation in the outer inviscid flow.

The Helmholtz theorem states that circulation is conserved; put simply this is conservation of the air's angular momentum. When an aircraft is at rest, there is no circulation. As the flow speed increases (that is, the aircraft accelerates in the air-body-fixed frame), a vortex, called the starting vortex, forms at the trailing edge of the airfoil, due to viscous effects in the boundary layer. Eventually the vortex detaches from the airfoil and gets swept away from it rearward. The circulation in the starting vortex is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the circulation around the airfoil. Theoretically, the starting vortex remains connected to the vortex bound in the airfoil, through the wing-tip vortices, forming a closed circuit. In reality, the starting vortex is dissipated by a number of effects, as are the wing-tip vortices far behind the aircraft. However, the net circulation in "the world" is still zero as the circulation from the vortices is transferred to the surroundings as they dissipate. (Note that despite being an idealisation of the real world, the 'vortex system' set up round a wing is both real and observable, and is one of the reasons that a light aircraft cannot take off immediately after a jumbo jet.)

Common misconceptions

Equal transit-time

One misconception encountered in a number of populist explanations of lift is the "equal transit time" fallacy. This fallacy assumes that the parcels of air that are divided above and below an airfoil must rejoin behind it. The fallacy states that because of the greater curvature (and hence longer path) of the upper surface of an airfoil, the air going over the top must go faster in order to "catch up" with the air flowing around the bottom.

Although it is true that the air moving over the top of the wing is moving faster, there is no requirement for equal transit time. In practice lift is only produced when the wing is presented to the air at a positive angle of attack and in these conditions the air flowing above will always have a shorter transit time than the air flowing below and the parcels of air will not rejoin.

It is also not uncommon to find erroneous confusion between "equal transit time" and Bernoulli's principle.

A further flaw in this explanation is that it requires an airfoil to have thickness and curvature in order to create lift. In fact, thin flat plate wings and sails create lift. If lift were a result of shape aircraft would not be able to fly inverted.

This explanation has gained currency by repetition in populist (rather than technical) books. At least one common pilot training book depicts the equal transit fallacy, adding to the confusion.

Coandă Effect

In order to generate lift a pressure differential must be created between the top and bottom surfaces of an airfoil. The Coandă Effect relates to the flow over the top surface, which usually accounts for the bulk of the lift generated by a wing. However the effect is not clearly defined and has its origins in a patent for an annular lifting device. GFS Projects Ltd of Cambridgeshire has developed a commercial application of the Coanda Effect through the design and production of an unmanned aerial vehicle which has a number of applications including surveillance. The principle is scalable and could be applied to manned flight. One can see a video clip of a test flight on GFS Projects Ltd's website, and also the design of a manned Coanda Effect flying vehicle, which looks surprisingly like a "flying saucer". (http://www.gfsprojects.co.uk/UAV.htm) (http://www.gfsprojects.co.uk/index.html)

There are several physical aspects of flow ascribed to the Coandă Effect. The first, and probably most relevant to the patent and the experimental work of Henry Coandă, is the bulk flow of air down behind the wing. However many consider this no more than the general process of a fluid filling the void behind an object moving through it.

The other effects frequently attributed to the Coandă Effect are very low scale and do not contribute to the production of lift in any significant way. They include Van der Waals forces which, for example, causes a drip of water flowing down the back of the spoon to follow the surface of the spoon rather than drop off at the widest part. Another common example is the dynamic frictional effect by which the air in closest contact with the surface of the wing is slowed, creating a turning moment towards the wing.

References

See also

Further reading

  • Quest for an improved explanation of lift Jaako Hoffren (Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Espoo, Finland) AIAA-2001-872 Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 39th, Reno, NV, Jan. 8-11, 2001 This paper focuses on a physics-based explanation of lift. Calculation of lift based on circulation with artificially imposed Kutta condition is interpreted as a mathematical model, having limited "real-world" physics, resulting from the assumption of potential flow. Also the role of viscosity is discussed. Author's claim is that viscosity is not important for lift generation.
  • Introduction to Flight, John D. Anderson, Jr., McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-299071-6. The author is the Curator of Aerodynamics at the National Air & Space Museum Smithsonian Institute and Professor Emeritus at the University of Maryland.
  • Understanding Flight, by David Anderson and Scott Eberhardt, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-136377-7. The authors are a physicist and an aeronautical engineer. They explain flight in non-technical terms and specifically address the equal-transit-time myth. Turning of the flow around the wing is attributed to the Coanda effect, which is quite controversial.
  • Fundamentals of Flight, Richard S. Shevell, Prentice-Hall International Editions, ISBN 0-13-332917-8. This book is primarily intended as a text for a one semester undergraduate course in mechanical or aeronautical engineering, although its sections on theory of flight are understandable with a passing knowledge of calculus and physics.

External links



Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia © 2001-2006 Wikipedia contributors (Disclaimer)
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Last updated on Tuesday March 11, 2008 at 17:48:57 PDT (GMT -0700)
View this article at Wikipedia.org - Edit this article at Wikipedia.org - Donate to the Wikimedia Foundation