Dictionary
Thesaurus
Reference
Translate
Web
Global Peace Index
2 reference results for: Global Peace Index
Wikipedia

The Global Peace Index is an attempt to measure the relative position of nations’ and regions’ peacefulness. It is maintained by the Institute for Economics and Peace and developed in consultation with an international panel of peace experts from peace institutes and think tanks, together with the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Sydney, Australia with data analysed by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The list was launched first in May 2007 and then recently in May 2008 and is claimed to be the first study to rank countries around the world according to their peacefulness. The study is the brainchild of Australian entrepreneur Steve Killelea and is endorsed by individuals such as the Dalai Lama, archbishop Desmond Tutu, Muhammad Yunus, former president of Ireland Mary Robinson and former US president Jimmy Carter. Factors examined by the authors include internal factors such as levels of violence and crime within the country and factors in a country's external relations such as military expenditure and wars.

Methodology

The research team was headed by The Economist Intelligence Unit in conjunction with academics and experts in the field of peace. They measured countries' peacefulness based on wide range of indicators, 24 in all. A table of the indicators is below. In the table, UCDP stands for the Uppsala Conflict Data Program maintained by the University of Uppsala in Sweden, EIU for The Economist Intelligence Unit, UNSCT for the United Nations Survey of Criminal Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, ICPS is the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College London, IISS for the International Institute for Strategic Studies publication The Military Balance 2007, SIPRI for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Arms Transfers Database, and BICC for the Bonn International Center for Conversion.

#
Indicator
Source
Year(s)
Coding
1 Number of external and internal wars fought UCDP 2000 to 2005 Total number
2 Estimated deaths due to external wars UCDP 2004 to 2005 Total number
3 Estimated deaths due to internal wars UCDP 2004 to 2005 Total number
4 Level of organized internal conflict EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
5 Relations with neighbouring countries EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
6 Level of distrust in other citizens EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
7 Number of displaced persons as percentage of population World Bank 2003 Refugee population by percentage of the origin country's population
8 Political instability EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
9 Level of respect for human rights (political terror scale) Amnesty International 2005 Qualitative measure
10 Potential for terrorist acts EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
11 Number of homicides UNSCT 2004 and 2002 Intentional homicides, including infanticide, per 100,000 people
12 Level of violent crime EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
13 Likelihood of violent demonstrations EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
14 Number of jailed persons ICPS 2006 Persons incarcerated per 100,000 people
15 Number of police and security officers UNSCT 2002 and 2000 Civil security officers per 100,000 people
16 Military expenditure as a percentage of GDP IISS 2004 Cash outlays for armed forces, as a percentage of GDP
17 Number of armed services personnel IISS 2004 Full-time military personnel per 100,000 people
18 Imports of major conventional weapons SIPRI 2001 to 2005 Imports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people
19 Exports of major conventional weapons SIPRI 2001 to 2005 Exports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people
20 United Nations deployments IISS 2006 to 2007 Total number
21 Non-United Nations deployments IISS 2006 to 2007 Total number
22 Number of heavy weapons BICC 2003 Weapons per 100,000 people
23 Ease of access to small arms and light weapons EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
24 Military capability or sophistication EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5

Indicators not already ranked on a 1 to 5 scale were converted by using the following formula: x=(x-Min(x))/(Max(x)-Min(x)) where Max(x) and Min(x) are the highest and lowest values for that indicator of the countries ranked in the index. The 0 to 1 scores that resulted were then converted to the 1 to 5 scale. Individual indicators were then weighted according to the research team's judgment of their importance. The scores were then tabulated into two weighted sub-indices: internal peace, weighted at 60% of a country's final score, and external peace, weighted at 40% of a country's final score.

The main findings of the Global Peace Index are:

  • Peace correlated to indicators such as income, schooling and the level of regional integration
  • Peaceful countries often shared high levels of transparency of government and low corruption
  • Small, stable countries which are part of regional blocks are most likely to get a higher ranking.

Statistical analysis was applied to discover more specific drivers of peace. Specifically, the research team looked for indicators that were included and excluded from the index that had high levels of correlation with the overall score and rank of countries. Among the statistically significant indicators that were not used in the analysis were the functionality of a country's government, regional integration, hostility to foreigners, importance of religion in national life, and GDP per capita.

Notably absent from the 2007 study are Belarus, Iceland, many African nations, Mongolia, North Korea and Afghanistan. They were not included because reliable data for the 24 indicators was not available.

Criticism and response to criticism

The Economist, in publishing the index, admitted that, "the index will run into some flak." Specifically, according to The Economist, the weighting of military expenditure "may seem to give heart to freeloaders: countries that enjoy peace precisely because others (often the USA) care for their defense." The true utility of the index may lie not in its specific rankings of countries now, but in how those rankings change over time, thus tracking when and how countries become more or less peaceful.

The Peace Index has been criticised for not including indicators specifically relating to violence against women and children. Riane Eisler, writing in the Christian Science Monitor, argued that, "to put it mildly, this blind spot makes the index very inaccurate." She mentions a number of specific cases, including Egypt, where she claims 90% of women are subject to genital mutilation, China, where, she says, "female infanticide is still a problem," and Chile, where 26% of women "suffered at least one episode of violence by a partner, according to a 2000 UNICEF study.

The Index has received endorsements from a number of major international figures, including the Dalai Lama, archbishop Desmond Tutu, Muhammad Yunus and former United States President Jimmy Carter. Steve Killelea, the Australian philanthropist who conceived the idea of the Index and created a definition for the Peace Industry, argues that the Index "is a wake-up call for leaders around the globe.

2007-2008 Global Peace Index rankings

Nations considered more peaceful have lower index scores. Countries with rankings in green are in the most peaceful 20% for that year; those in red are in the bottom 20%.

Country 2008 Rank 2008 Score 2007 Rank 2007 Score 2007–2008 Change
Iceland 1 1.176
Denmark 2 1.333 3 1.377 +01
Norway 3 1.343 1 1.357 −02
New Zealand 4 1.350 2 1.363 −02
Japan 5 1.358 5 1.413 0
Republic of Ireland 6 1.410 4 1.396 −02
Portugal 7 1.412 9 1.481 +02
Finland 8 1.432 6 1.447 −02
Luxembourg 9 1.446
Austria 10 1.449 10 1.483 0
Canada 11 1.451 8 1.481 −03
Switzerland 12 1.465 14 1.526 +02
Sweden 13 1.468 7 1.478 −06
Germany 14 1.475 12 1.523 −02
Belgium 15 1.485 11 1.498 −04
Slovenia 16 1.491 15 1.539 −01
Czech Republic 17 1.501 13 1.524 −04
Hungary 18 1.576 18 1.575 0
Chile 19 1.576 16 1.568 −03
Slovakia 20 1.576 17 1.571 −03
Uruguay 21 1.606 24 1.661 +03
Netherlands 22 1.607 20 1.620 −02
Hong Kong 23 1.608 23 1.657 0
Romania 24 1.611 26 1.682 +02
Oman 25 1.612 22 1.641 −03
Bhutan 26 1.616 19 1.611 −07
Australia 27 1.652 25 1.664 −02
Italy 28 1.653 33 1.724 +05
Singapore 29 1.673 29 1.692 0
Spain 30 1.683 21 1.633 −09
Poland 31 1.687 27 1.683 −04
South Korea 32 1.691 32 1.719 0
Qatar 33 1.694 30 1.702 −03
Costa Rica 34 1.701 31 1.702 −03
Estonia 35 1.702 28 1.684 −07
France 36 1.707 34 1.729 −02
Vietnam 37 1.720 35 1.729 −02
Malaysia 37 1.721 37 1.744 0
Latvia 39 1.723 47 1.848 +08
Ghana 40 1.723 40 1.765 0
Lithuania 41 1.723 43 1.788 +02
United Arab Emirates 42 1.745 38 1.747 −04
Madagascar 43 1.770 41 1.766 −02
Taiwan 44 1.779 36 1.731 −08
Kuwait 45 1.786 46 1.818 +01
Botswana 46 1.792 42 1.786 −04
Tunisia 47 1.797 39 1.762 −08
Panama 48 1.797 45 1.798 −03
United Kingdom 49 1.801 49 1.898 0
Mozambique 50 1.803 50 1.909 0
Laos 51 1.810
Cyprus 52 1.847 51 1.915 −01
Zambia 53 1.856 53 1.930 0
Greece 54 1.867 44 1.791 −10
Gabon 55 1.878 56 1.952 +01
Argentina 56 1.895 52 1.923 +01
Bulgaria 57 1.903 54 1.936 −03
Tanzania 58 1.919 57 1.966 −01
Nicaragua 59 1.919 66 2.020 +07
Croatia 60 1.926 67 2.030 +07
Libya 61 1.927 58 1.967 −03
Cuba 62 1.954 59 1.968 −03
Morocco 63 1.954 48 1.893 −15
Equatorial Guinea 64 1.964 71 2.059 +07
Jordan 65 1.969 63 1.997 −02
Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 1.974 75 2.089 +09
China 67 1.981 60 1.980 −07
Indonesia 68 1.983 78 2.111 +10
Egypt 69 1.987 73 2.068 +04
Paraguay 70 1.997 55 1.946 −15
Senegal 71 2.011 65 2.017 −06
Kazakhstan 72 2.018 61 1.995 −11
Malawi 73 2.024 68 2.038 −05
Bahrain 74 2.025 62 1.995 −12
Syria 75 2.027 77 2.106 +02
Rwanda 76 2.030
Namibia 77 2.042 64 2.003 −13
Bolivia 78 2.043 69 2.052 −09
Albania 79 2.044
Peru 80 2.046 70 2.056 −10
Burkina Faso 81 2.062
Dominican Republic 82 2.069 74 2.071 −08
Moldova 83 2.091 72 2.059 −11
Ukraine 84 2.096 80 2.150 −04
Serbia 85 2.110 84 2.181 −01
Bangladesh 86 2.118 86 2.219 0
Macedonia 87 2.119 82 2.170 −05
Mongolia 88 2.155
El Salvador 89 2.163 89 2.244 0
Brazil 90 2.168 83 2.173 −07
Cambodia 91 2.179 85 2.197 −06
Cameroon 92 2.182 76 2.093 −16
Mexico 93 2.191 79 2.125 −14
Belarus 94 2.194
Papua New Guinea 95 2.224 88 2.223 −07
Jamaica 96 2.226 81 2.164 −15
United States of America 97 2.227 96 2.317 −01
Trinidad and Tobago 98 2.230 94 2.286 −04
Mali 99 2.238
Ecuador 100 2.274 87 2.219 −13
Azerbaijan 101 2.287 101 2.448 0
Turkmenistan 102 2.302
Guatemala 103 2.328 93 2.285 −10
Honduras 104 2.335 98 2.390 −06
Iran 105 2.341 97 2.320 −08
Yemen 106 2.352 95 2.309 −11
India 107 2.355 109 2.530 +02
Saudi Arabia 108 2.357 90 2.246 −18
Haiti 109 2.362
Angola 110 2.364 112 2.587 +02
Uzbekistan 111 2.377 110 2.542 −01
Algeria 112 2.378 107 2.503 −05
Philippines 113 2.385 100 2.428 −13
Uganda 114 2.391 104 2.489 −10
Turkey 115 2.403 92 2.272 −23
South Africa 116 2.412 99 2.399 −17
Republic of the Congo 117 2.417
Thailand 118 2.424 105 2.491 −13
Kenya 119 2.429 91 2.258 −28
Mauritania 120 2.435
Ethiopia 121 2.439 103 2.479 −18
Cote d'Ivoire 122 2.451 113 2.638 −09
Venezuela 123 2.505 102 2.453 −21
Zimbabwe 124 2.513 106 2.495 −18
Sri Lanka 125 2.584 111 2.575 −14
Myanmar 126 2.590 108 2.524 −18
Pakistan 127 2.694 115 2.697 −12
Democratic Republic of the Congo 128 2.707
Nigeria 129 2.724 117 2.898 −12
Colombia 130 2.757 116 2.770 −14
Russia 131 2.777 118 2.903 −13
Lebanon 132 2.840 114 2.662 −18
North Korea 133 2.850
Central African Republic 134 2.857
Chad 135 3.007
Israel 136 3.052 119 3.033 −17
Afghanistan 137 3.126
Sudan 138 3.189 120 3.182 −18
Somalia 139 3.293
Iraq 140 3.514 121 3.437 −19

References

External links

Wikipedia

The Global Peace Index is an attempt to measure the relative position of nations’ and regions’ peacefulness. It is maintained by the Institute for Economics and Peace and developed in consultation with an international panel of peace experts from peace institutes and think tanks, together with the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Sydney, Australia with data analysed by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The list was launched first in May 2007 and then recently in May 2008 and is claimed to be the first study to rank countries around the world according to their peacefulness. The study is the brainchild of Australian entrepreneur Steve Killelea and is endorsed by individuals such as the Dalai Lama, archbishop Desmond Tutu, Muhammad Yunus, former president of Ireland Mary Robinson and former US president Jimmy Carter. Factors examined by the authors include internal factors such as levels of violence and crime within the country and factors in a country's external relations such as military expenditure and wars.

Methodology

The research team was headed by The Economist Intelligence Unit in conjunction with academics and experts in the field of peace. They measured countries' peacefulness based on wide range of indicators, 24 in all. A table of the indicators is below. In the table, UCDP stands for the Uppsala Conflict Data Program maintained by the University of Uppsala in Sweden, EIU for The Economist Intelligence Unit, UNSCT for the United Nations Survey of Criminal Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, ICPS is the International Center for Prison Studies at King's College London, IISS for the International Institute for Strategic Studies publication The Military Balance 2007, SIPRI for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Arms Transfers Database, and BICC for the Bonn International Center for Conversion.

#
Indicator
Source
Year(s)
Coding
1 Number of external and internal wars fought UCDP 2000 to 2005 Total number
2 Estimated deaths due to external wars UCDP 2004 to 2005 Total number
3 Estimated deaths due to internal wars UCDP 2004 to 2005 Total number
4 Level of organized internal conflict EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
5 Relations with neighbouring countries EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
6 Level of distrust in other citizens EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
7 Number of displaced persons as percentage of population World Bank 2003 Refugee population by percentage of the origin country's population
8 Political instability EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
9 Level of respect for human rights (political terror scale) Amnesty International 2005 Qualitative measure
10 Potential for terrorist acts EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
11 Number of homicides UNSCT 2004 and 2002 Intentional homicides, including infanticide, per 100,000 people
12 Level of violent crime EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
13 Likelihood of violent demonstrations EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
14 Number of jailed persons ICPS 2006 Persons incarcerated per 100,000 people
15 Number of police and security officers UNSCT 2002 and 2000 Civil security officers per 100,000 people
16 Military expenditure as a percentage of GDP IISS 2004 Cash outlays for armed forces, as a percentage of GDP
17 Number of armed services personnel IISS 2004 Full-time military personnel per 100,000 people
18 Imports of major conventional weapons SIPRI 2001 to 2005 Imports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people
19 Exports of major conventional weapons SIPRI 2001 to 2005 Exports of major conventional weapons per 100,000 people
20 United Nations deployments IISS 2006 to 2007 Total number
21 Non-United Nations deployments IISS 2006 to 2007 Total number
22 Number of heavy weapons BICC 2003 Weapons per 100,000 people
23 Ease of access to small arms and light weapons EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5
24 Military capability or sophistication EIU 2007 Qualitative scale, ranked 1 to 5

Indicators not already ranked on a 1 to 5 scale were converted by using the following formula: x=(x-Min(x))/(Max(x)-Min(x)) where Max(x) and Min(x) are the highest and lowest values for that indicator of the countries ranked in the index. The 0 to 1 scores that resulted were then converted to the 1 to 5 scale. Individual indicators were then weighted according to the research team's judgment of their importance. The scores were then tabulated into two weighted sub-indices: internal peace, weighted at 60% of a country's final score, and external peace, weighted at 40% of a country's final score.

The main findings of the Global Peace Index are:

  • Peace correlated to indicators such as income, schooling and the level of regional integration
  • Peaceful countries often shared high levels of transparency of government and low corruption
  • Small, stable countries which are part of regional blocks are most likely to get a higher ranking.

Statistical analysis was applied to discover more specific drivers of peace. Specifically, the research team looked for indicators that were included and excluded from the index that had high levels of correlation with the overall score and rank of countries. Among the statistically significant indicators that were not used in the analysis were the functionality of a country's government, regional integration, hostility to foreigners, importance of religion in national life, and GDP per capita.

Notably absent from the 2007 study are Belarus, Iceland, many African nations, Mongolia, North Korea and Afghanistan. They were not included because reliable data for the 24 indicators was not available.

Criticism and response to criticism

The Economist, in publishing the index, admitted that, "the index will run into some flak." Specifically, according to The Economist, the weighting of military expenditure "may seem to give heart to freeloaders: countries that enjoy peace precisely because others (often the USA) care for their defense." The true utility of the index may lie not in its specific rankings of countries now, but in how those rankings change over time, thus tracking when and how countries become more or less peaceful.

The Peace Index has been criticised for not including indicators specifically relating to violence against women and children. Riane Eisler, writing in the Christian Science Monitor, argued that, "to put it mildly, this blind spot makes the index very inaccurate." She mentions a number of specific cases, including Egypt, where she claims 90% of women are subject to genital mutilation, China, where, she says, "female infanticide is still a problem," and Chile, where 26% of women "suffered at least one episode of violence by a partner, according to a 2000 UNICEF study.

The Index has received endorsements from a number of major international figures, including the Dalai Lama, archbishop Desmond Tutu, Muhammad Yunus and former United States President Jimmy Carter. Steve Killelea, the Australian philanthropist who conceived the idea of the Index and created a definition for the Peace Industry, argues that the Index "is a wake-up call for leaders around the globe.

2007-2008 Global Peace Index rankings

Nations considered more peaceful have lower index scores. Countries with rankings in green are in the most peaceful 20% for that year; those in red are in the bottom 20%.

Country 2008 Rank 2008 Score 2007 Rank 2007 Score 2007–2008 Change
Iceland 1 1.176
Denmark 2 1.333 3 1.377 +01
Norway 3 1.343 1 1.357 −02
New Zealand 4 1.350 2 1.363 −02
Japan 5 1.358 5 1.413 0
Republic of Ireland 6 1.410 4 1.396 −02
Portugal 7 1.412 9 1.481 +02
Finland 8 1.432 6 1.447 −02
Luxembourg 9 1.446
Austria 10 1.449 10 1.483 0
Canada 11 1.451 8 1.481 −03
Switzerland 12 1.465 14 1.526 +02
Sweden 13 1.468 7 1.478 −06
Germany 14 1.475 12 1.523 −02
Belgium 15 1.485 11 1.498 −04
Slovenia 16 1.491 15 1.539 −01
Czech Republic 17 1.501 13 1.524 −04
Hungary 18 1.576 18 1.575 0
Chile 19 1.576 16 1.568 −03
Slovakia 20 1.576 17 1.571 −03
Uruguay 21 1.606 24 1.661 +03
Netherlands 22 1.607 20 1.620 −02
Hong Kong 23 1.608 23 1.657 0
Romania 24 1.611 26 1.682 +02
Oman 25 1.612 22 1.641 −03
Bhutan 26 1.616 19 1.611 −07
Australia 27 1.652 25 1.664 −02
Italy 28 1.653 33 1.724 +05
Singapore 29 1.673 29 1.692 0
Spain 30 1.683 21 1.633 −09
Poland 31 1.687 27 1.683 −04
South Korea 32 1.691 32 1.719 0
Qatar 33 1.694 30 1.702 −03
Costa Rica 34 1.701 31 1.702 −03
Estonia 35 1.702 28 1.684 −07
France 36 1.707 34 1.729 −02
Vietnam 37 1.720 35 1.729 −02
Malaysia 37 1.721 37 1.744 0
Latvia 39 1.723 47 1.848 +08
Ghana 40 1.723 40 1.765 0
Lithuania 41 1.723 43 1.788 +02
United Arab Emirates 42 1.745 38 1.747 −04
Madagascar 43 1.770 41 1.766 −02
Taiwan 44 1.779 36 1.731 −08
Kuwait 45 1.786 46 1.818 +01
Botswana 46 1.792 42 1.786 −04
Tunisia 47 1.797 39 1.762 −08
Panama 48 1.797 45 1.798 −03
United Kingdom 49 1.801 49 1.898 0
Mozambique 50 1.803 50 1.909 0
Laos 51 1.810
Cyprus 52 1.847 51 1.915 −01
Zambia 53 1.856 53 1.930 0
Greece 54 1.867 44 1.791 −10
Gabon 55 1.878 56 1.952 +01
Argentina 56 1.895 52 1.923 +01
Bulgaria 57 1.903 54 1.936 −03
Tanzania 58 1.919 57 1.966 −01
Nicaragua 59 1.919 66 2.020 +07
Croatia 60 1.926 67 2.030 +07
Libya 61 1.927 58 1.967 −03
Cuba 62 1.954 59 1.968 −03
Morocco 63 1.954 48 1.893 −15
Equatorial Guinea 64 1.964 71 2.059 +07
Jordan 65 1.969 63 1.997 −02
Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 1.974 75 2.089 +09
China 67 1.981 60 1.980 −07
Indonesia 68 1.983 78 2.111 +10
Egypt 69 1.987 73 2.068 +04
Paraguay 70 1.997 55 1.946 −15
Senegal 71 2.011 65 2.017 −06
Kazakhstan 72 2.018 61 1.995 −11
Malawi 73 2.024 68 2.038 −05
Bahrain 74 2.025 62 1.995 −12
Syria 75 2.027 77 2.106 +02
Rwanda 76 2.030
Namibia 77 2.042 64 2.003 −13
Bolivia 78 2.043 69 2.052 −09
Albania 79 2.044
Peru 80 2.046 70 2.056 −10
Burkina Faso 81 2.062
Dominican Republic 82 2.069 74 2.071 −08
Moldova 83 2.091 72 2.059 −11
Ukraine 84 2.096 80 2.150 −04
Serbia 85 2.110 84 2.181 −01
Bangladesh 86 2.118 86 2.219 0
Macedonia 87 2.119 82 2.170 −05
Mongolia 88 2.155
El Salvador 89 2.163 89 2.244 0
Brazil 90 2.168 83 2.173 −07
Cambodia 91 2.179 85 2.197 −06
Cameroon 92 2.182 76 2.093 −16
Mexico 93 2.191 79 2.125 −14
Belarus 94 2.194
Papua New Guinea 95 2.224 88 2.223 −07
Jamaica 96 2.226 81 2.164 −15
United States of America 97 2.227 96 2.317 −01
Trinidad and Tobago 98 2.230 94 2.286 −04
Mali 99 2.238
Ecuador 100 2.274 87 2.219 −13
Azerbaijan 101 2.287 101 2.448 0
Turkmenistan 102 2.302
Guatemala 103 2.328 93 2.285 −10
Honduras 104 2.335 98 2.390 −06
Iran 105 2.341 97 2.320 −08
Yemen 106 2.352 95 2.309 −11
India 107 2.355 109 2.530 +02
Saudi Arabia 108 2.357 90 2.246 −18
Haiti 109 2.362
Angola 110 2.364 112 2.587 +02
Uzbekistan 111 2.377 110 2.542 −01
Algeria 112 2.378 107 2.503 −05
Philippines 113 2.385 100 2.428 −13
Uganda 114 2.391 104 2.489 −10
Turkey 115 2.403 92 2.272 −23
South Africa 116 2.412 99 2.399 −17
Republic of the Congo 117 2.417
Thailand 118 2.424 105 2.491 −13
Kenya 119 2.429 91 2.258 −28
Mauritania 120 2.435
Ethiopia 121 2.439 103 2.479 −18
Cote d'Ivoire 122 2.451 113 2.638 −09
Venezuela 123 2.505 102 2.453 −21
Zimbabwe 124 2.513 106 2.495 −18
Sri Lanka 125 2.584 111 2.575 −14
Myanmar 126 2.590 108 2.524 −18
Pakistan 127 2.694 115 2.697 −12
Democratic Republic of the Congo 128 2.707
Nigeria 129 2.724 117 2.898 −12
Colombia 130 2.757 116 2.770 −14
Russia 131 2.777 118 2.903 −13
Lebanon 132 2.840 114 2.662 −18
North Korea 133 2.850
Central African Republic 134 2.857
Chad 135 3.007
Israel 136 3.052 119 3.033 −17
Afghanistan 137 3.126
Sudan 138 3.189 120 3.182 −18
Somalia 139 3.293
Iraq 140 3.514 121 3.437 −19

References

External links

Share This:Share This: digg.comShare This: ma.gnolia.comShare This: www.stumbleupon.comShare This: del.icio.usShare This: FacebookShare This: favorites.live.comShare This: www.technorati.comShare This: furl.netShare This: myweb2.search.yahoo.comShare This: www.google.com