The term non-cooperative is sometimes criticised as misleading, as a number of the countries which have appeared on the list from time to time appear, not because they deliberately propagate a culture which is perceived to assist money laundering, but because they simply lack the infrastructure or resources to cope with relatively sophisticated financial criminals who try to operate there.
and fifteen countries initially appeared on the list as being regarded as uncooperative in the fight against money laundering:The initial list met much criticism from professionals experienced in the offshore sector. The designation of the Cayman Islands as non-cooperative was thought to be harsh, particularly as the 2000 report itself acknowledged that "the Cayman Islands has been a leader in developing anti-money laundering programmes throughout the Caribbean region. It has served as president of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force, and it has provided substantial assistance to neighbouring states in the region. It has demonstrated co-operation on criminal law enforcement matters, and uncovered several serious cases of fraud and money laundering otherwise unknown to authorities in FATF member states."
The FATF produces annual reports, designated countries that go onto and come off the list.
The general trend has been towards countries coming off the list, as there is an obvious incentive for countries to tighten up areas criticised in the FATF reports as not meeting the required international standards. To date, 21 countries have been de-listed, and only 8 countries have been added since the additional list (interestingly, none of which were offshore jurisdictions).
only the following country remained designated as non-cooperative: