| Evaluation Method
| Evaluation Method Type
| Applicable Stages
| Description
| Advantages
| Disadvantages |
| Think aloud protocol
| Testing
| Design, coding, testing and release of application
| Participants in testing express their thoughts on the application while executing set tasks
| - Less expensive
- Results are close to what is experienced by users
|
The Environment is not natural to the user |
| Remote testing
| Testing
| Design, coding, testing and release of application
| The experimenter does not directly observe the users while they use the application
| - Efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction, the three usability issues, are covered
| - Additional Software is necessary to observe the participants from a distance
|
| Focus groups
| Inquiry
| Testing and release of application
| A moderator guides a discussion with a group of users of the application
| - If done before prototypes are developed, can save money
- Produces a lot of useful ideas from the users themselves
- Can improve customer relations
|
The environment is not natural to the user and may provide inaccurate results.
The data collected tends to have low validity due to the unstructured nature of the discussion |
| Interviews
| Inquiry
| Design, coding, testing and release of application
| The users are interviewed to find out about their experience and expectations
| - Good at obtaining detailed information
- Few participants are needed
- Can improve customer relations
|
Can not be conducted remotely
Does not address the usability issue of efficiency |
| Cognitive walkthrough
| Inspection
| Design, coding, testing and release of application
| A team of evaluators walk through the application discussing usability issues through the use of a paper prototype or a working prototype
| - Good at refining requirements
- does not require a fully functional prototype
| - Does not address user satisfaction or efficiency
- The designer may not behave as the average user when using the application
|
| Pluralistic walkthrough
| Inspection
| Design
| A team of users, usability engineers and product developers review the usability of the paper prototype of the application
| - Usability issues are resolved faster
- Greater number of usability problems can be found at one time
|
Does not address the usability issue of efficiency |
: Genise, Pauline. “Usability Evaluation: Methods and Techniques: Version 2.0” August 28, 2002. University of Texas.