CUCA holds regular speaker meetings with Conservative politicians and thinkers, as well as campaigning for the Conservatives in elections and holding policy discussions. It also focuses on the social agenda for Conservative sympathisers in Cambridge, hosting assorted social events and parties, such as the termly Chairman's Dinner. High turnouts at events, especially the popular Port Parties and Chairmans' Dinners, point to an interested and active society membership.
The Association has long been intimately connected with the Cambridge Union debating society, with a heavy overlap of simultaneous officeholders in the two societies, one recent Chairman even holding the post at the same time as that of Union President, sparking frequent charges of endemic and undesirable involvement between the two. CUCA counters that many Union activists are not CUCA members and that CUCA is the only society to encourage activists to get involved in the Union as a political forum.
CUCA is reputed to have reached the apex of its influence in the 1960s, with the so-called 'Cambridge Mafia' of activists, mainly at Peterhouse, many of whom went on to cabinet careers in the Thatcher and Major governments.
| Office | Office Holder | College |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman | Hugo Hadlow | St John's |
| Vice-Chairman | James Arthur Sharpe | Fitzwilliam |
| Junior Treasurer | Shamir Shah | Downing |
| Campaigns Officer | Henry Walton | Magdalene |
| Secretary | Caroline Cummins | Newnham |
| Registrar | Gavin Rice | Queens' |
| Committee | Victoria Watson | Jesus |
| Committee | James Shaw | King's |
| Committee | Bethany Williams | Lucy Cavendish |
| Committee | Hugh Burling | St John's |
See also Former chairmen of Cambridge University Conservative Association
The society has, in the past, occasionally hit the headlines of local papers over electoral disputes and allegations of malpractice. In early 1998, Varsity published a story alleging that "weeks of bitter in-fighting culminated in allegations of election-rigging and a move to censure the society's most senior members." However, Varsity noted that the motions of censure themselves had no reasons formally attached to them by their proposers and that some of those who had signed had no inkling why they were supporting them other than on the word of one of the factions involved. Indeed, it has been claimed that the article is factually inaccurate in one respect, as the motions did not fail because of a technicality, but were actually withdrawn by their proposers - without a word of explanation - and without ever having been discussed or voted on in a meeting.
Indeed, 'Varsity' articles on CUCA elections have themselves come under fire. Following a 1999 article, 'Conservatives in corruption crisis', the paper was forced to print a front-page 'Rectification'. The original article included allegations of vote buying against the then-chairman. Both journalists writing the original article were prominent Cambridge University Liberal Democrats members, as was the accuser in the article.
In 1992 The Economist wrote that "competition to rise to the top of CUCA is good preparation for a political career in the Conservative Party, for several reasons. Ideology counts for nothing. What matters is knowing how to make friends and when to stab them in the back. If you cut your political teeth at CUCA, you are liable to end up sporting a sharp set of fangs." In 2005 The Daily Telegraph described the society as "secretive, conspiratorial, overcomplicated, probably calculated to benefit some chum or other, so clever that it is stupid."
Today CUCA is thriving and maintaining a substantial three-figure membership. Indeed currently the process of vote buying appears to have subsided with membership increases broadly stable across the term, thanks to changes in the constitution of the Society.