In its capacity it oversees the procurement of all ICT equipment and e-learning strategy for schools.
Becta's objectives are "to influence strategic direction and development of national education policy to best take advantage of technology" and "to develop a national digital infrastructure and resources strategy leading to greater national coherence..Becta have recently launched a campaign which is designed to help consumers (initially parents) better understand how technology can benefit student's education and improve overall school performance. The campaign website can be found at http://www.nextgenerationlearning.org.uk
Chairman of the Board, Andrew Pinder, in a seminar in October 2006 deplored the "hopeless disorganization" and "extraordinary fragmented" supply side in the educational sector, and added:
On 21 November 2006 John Pugh MP sponsored a Parliamentary Early Day Motion, now signed by 130 MPs:
Within two days Becta rejected the criticism, stating that:
However, Crispin Weston, an advisor to Becta, pointed out that:
In an article in January 2007 John Pugh added:
Becta administers the procurement of ICT equipment for schools using framework agreements, which last for four years and have been deemed legal under European law.
The result of these agreements is that educational institutions in the UK intending to purchase goods and services relating to ICT, including system design, hardware and software provision, training, implementation and ongoing technical support, where the budget would breach the procurement threshold (of about £100k) can save the hassle by procuring from a company on a Becta maintained list.
The listed companies are also deemed to comply with the appropriate technical standards as well as Becta's Framework for ICT Technical Support (FITS)
While schools and Local Education Authorities are not legally obliged to purchase from the listed suppliers, these two factors create an enormous pressure for them to do so. The effect is to create a closed market. If, for example, none of these suppliers are willing to provide Open Source Software to run servers and networks, then such products will not be found in schools, whether or not that was the intended consequence. (See Becta and open source)
On 24 February 2006, Becta dispatched a contract notice for this four year framework agreement of unspecified value to deliver various "Learning Services" such as Virtual learning environments and other ICT products. Participating companies had to have a net worth of at least £700k to qualify and satisfy a list of functional requirements. The window for tenders closed on 30 March 2006 and the 10 suppliers chosen from 119 applicants announced on 22 December 2006 were:
When challenged in an interview on the question of why none of these suppliers made available the open source platform Moodle, Stephen Lucey said:
In 5 January 2007, Crispin Weston, who had helped Becta draw up the criteria used to select suppliers, asked the EC Competition Commission to investigate his allegation that a significant number of the successful tenders had failed to implement the mandatory functional requirements, including particular aspects of inter-operability. He also added in his letter to the Commission that they should take action on the further issue of:
Gerard Toplass of Azzurri Education said they had invested £250k (and six programmers working 15 hours a day for six months) into Becta's stringent testing regime. He also expected learning platforms to be sold separately in all but those schools that are being built from scratch.
On 23 November 2005, Becta dispatched a contract notice for this framework agreement in the Official Journal of the European Union of unspecified value to deliver computer hardware and networks to capable of running high speed access and a common systems framework to schools. On 8 August 2006 the contracts were officially awarded, though the publication of the announcement was not until 27 September.
The 16 successful companies were:
Each company must be capable of providing the entire infrastructure for an entire school alone as part of the deal; there is no room for specialist suppliers for, say, just the computer mice.
Though Becta claims to have negotiated purchase prices which mean "it will be harder to get it cheaper anywhere else", Becta reveals no pricing guidelines. Instead, schools are supposed to write a specification and run a mini-competition like an auction among those of the sixteen suppliers who express an interest in order to determine the price. This work itself can be contracted out by schools as well after a mini-competition among listed consultancy suppliers. (see Consultancy services framework agreement)
Once the contractor is chosen, a Service Order is signed between the two parties specifying the services that are being provided, and the prices. Becta should receive quarterly management reports from the companies operating under the regime detailing what Service Orders have been signed, and the full accounts.
On 21 December 2005, this framework agreement was announced allowing schools to hire "external consultants to take responsibility for the often time consuming and costly decisions around developing an ICT infrastructure" which is due to last until 2008.
The 21 winning consultancy contractors are: 3E's Enterprise, Brian Farrington, Cambridge Education, Deloitte MCS Ltd, Educational ICT Services Ltd, Edunova (WSP Building Ltd), Enterprise MCP Ltd, Four S, Hornagold & Hills, Improcom, Logica CMG UK Ltd, Mantix, Mason Communications Ltd, Mouchel Parkman Services, NCC Services, Novatia, PriceWaterhouseCoopers Ltd Liability Partnership, RM, Serco, Socitm Ltd, Tribal Group
Becta recognizes that the overlap between these companies who may be managing the procurement on behalf of the schools, and the companies who would eventually be bidding to supply the contracts, could result in conflicts of interest. To overcome this, Becta allows a company to "withdraw from the process once the specification for the ICT infrastructure [which they have written] is defined" before competing for the provision of the infrastructure.
(40 suppliers.)
A three year "Laptops for teachers" framework agreement ran from 2003 to 2006.
Becta claims on its website that the advantages of their regime were the extended warranties, and savings of £45 million. The framework agreement is now closed
(23 suppliers) This framework agreement ran from 2004 to January 2007 and is now closed.
(14 suppliers, but the software is split into seven categories and, for example, only six suppliers are approved for graphics and publishing).
The Software Licensing Framework has been set up to provide a range of software products and value-added services specifically for education.
This EU-compliant framework originally ran until April 2008, and has been extended until October 2008.
(10 suppliers)
The Internet Services Accreditation was set up as a result of an initiative from the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) to provide guidance on this subject. The service enables schools to purchase internet services from accredited suppliers that meet and maintain specific standards in content filtering and service performance.
In addition to the existing frameworks, Becta has one more in the pipeline.
A consultation on the functional requirements for information management (including MIS) closed on 30th September 2006. Over the consultation period of two months there were eleven comments submitted.
The functional requirements for information management was published on 9th October 2006.
It enables schools to identify where they are and shows the practical steps they can take to gain even greater benefit from their use of ICT.
In many areas, it complements the work schools currently undertake for Ofsted and can be provided as evidence for a school’s Self Evaluation Framework (SEF).
The self-review framework offers schools a route to achieving the ICT Mark, which is a nationally recognised accreditation scheme which gives schools recognition for their achievements in reaching a standard of maturity in their use of technology.
Procurement of curriculum software is available to schools via Curriculum Online, in which there are huge numbers of suppliers. This is not a framework in the same model of the others. Curriculum Online is due to end in August 2008.
In May 2005 Becta published a report of eight case studies where Open Source software was deployed in Schools on servers and in the classroom, often mixed with Microsoft products. The conclusions were positive and the considerable savings in cost were noted.
In spite of this experience, Becta's infrastructure framework for suppliers to schools outlined above has been accused of excluding open source systems by its choice of companies.
The current chairman of Becta holds the view that "open source is [no] different from any other software -- it's just the pricing structure is different, that's all. But [its supporters] have a passion. It's a religion, it's a real belief."
Becta has not named any tender for a major framework contract who has been successful in offering open source products as part of their package.
To tackle this problem Becta has appointed Research Machines to develop a common industry-wide standard that will bring huge benefits to schools, allowing the exchange of resources within and between schools.The aim of this development is to provide the industry with an interoperability standard, followed by demonstration of support for the format with the production of an open-source file viewer. Becta will support the development of the specification and, by devising the interoperability file format to support certain agreed file features common to interactive whiteboards, work to obtain whiteboard vendors commitment to support the standard.