Specific cases or limits of random walks include the drunkard's walk and Lévy flight. Random walks are related to the diffusion models and are a fundamental topic in discussions of Markov processes. Several properties of random walks, including dispersal distributions, first-passage times and encounter rates, have been extensively studied.
Various different types of random walks are of interest. Often, random walks are assumed to be Markov, but other, more complicated walks are also of interest. Some random walks are on graphs, others on the line, in the plane, or in higher dimensions, while some random walks are on groups. Random walks also vary with regard to the time parameter. Often, the walk is indexed by the natural numbers, as in . However, some walks take their steps at random times, and in that case the position is defined for .
This walk can be illustrated as follows. Say you flip a fair coin. If it lands on heads, you move one to the right on the number line. If it lands on tails, you move one to the left. So after five flips, you have the possibility of landing on 1, -1, 3, -3, 5, or -5. You can land on 1 by flipping three heads and two tails in any order. There are 10 possible ways of landing on 1. Similarly, there are 10 ways of landing on -1 (by flipping three tails and two heads), 5 ways of landing on 3 (by flipping four heads and one tail), 5 ways of landing on -3 (by flipping four tails and one head), 1 way of landing on 5 (by flipping five heads), and 1 way of landing on -5 (by flipping five tails). See the figure below for an illustration of this example.
What can we say about the position of the walk after steps? Of course, it is random, so we cannot calculate it. But we may say quite a bit about its distribution. It is not hard to see that the expectation of is zero. For example, this follows by the additivity property of expectation: . A similar calculation, using the independence of the random variables , shows that . This hints that , the expected translation distance after steps, should be of the order of . In fact,
Suppose we draw a line some distance from the origin of the walk. How many times will the random walk cross the line if permitted to continue walking forever? The following, perhaps surprising theorem is the answer: simple random walk on will almost surely cross every point an infinite number of times. This result has many names: the level-crossing phenomenon, recurrence or the gambler's ruin. The reason for the last name is as follows: if you are a gambler with a finite amount of money playing a fair game against a bank with an infinite amount of money, you will surely lose. The amount of money you have will perform a random walk, and it will almost surely, at some time, reach 0 and the game will be over.
If and are positive integers, then the expected number of steps until a one dimensional simple random walk starting at first hits b or -a is . The probability that this walk will hit b before -a steps is
Some of the results mentioned above can be derived from properties of Pascal's triangle. The number of different walks of steps where each step is or is clearly . For the simple random walk, each of these walks are equally likely. In order for to be equal to a number it is necessary and sufficient that the number of in the walk exceeds those of by . Thus, the number of walks which satisfy is precisely the number of ways of choosing elements from an element set (for this to be non-zero, it is necessary that be an even number), which is an entry in Pascal's triangle denoted by . Therefore, the probability that is equal to . By representing entries of Pascal's triangle in terms of factorials and using Stirling's formula, one can obtain good estimates for these probabilities for large values of .
This relation with Pascal's triangle is easily demonstrated for small values of . At zero turns, the only possibility will be to remain at zero. However, at one turn, you can move either to the left or the right of zero, meaning there is one chance of landing on -1 or one chance of landing on 1. At two turns, you examine the turns from before. If you had been at 1, you could move to 2 or back to zero. If you had been at -1, you could move to -2 or back to zero. So there is one chance of landing on -2, two chances of landing on zero, and one chance of landing on 2.
Imagine now a drunkard walking randomly in a city. The city is realistically infinite and arranged in a square grid, and at every intersection, the drunkard chooses one of the four possible routes (including the one he came from) with equal probability. Formally, this is a random walk on the set of all points in the plane with integer coordinates. Will the drunkard ever get back to his home from the bar? It turns out that he will. This is the high dimensional equivalent of the level crossing problem discussed above. However, in dimensions 3 and above, this no longer holds. In other words, a drunk bird might forever wander the sky, never finding its nest. The formal terms to describe this phenomenon is that a random walk in dimensions 1 and 2 is recurrent, while in dimension 3 and above it is transient. This was proven by Pólya in 1921, and is discussed in a section of Markov Chains available online
The trajectory of a random walk is the collection of sites it visited, considered as a set with disregard to when the walk arrived at the point. In one dimension, the trajectory is simply all points between the minimum height the walk achieved and the maximum (both are, on average, on the order of √n). In higher dimensions the set has interesting geometric properties. In fact, one gets a discrete fractal, that is a set which exhibits stochastic self-similarity on large scales, but on small scales one can observe "jaggedness" resulting from the grid on which the walk is performed. The two books of Lawler referenced below are a good source on this topic.
Assume now that our city is no longer a perfect square grid. When our drunkard reaches a certain junction he picks between the various available roads with equal probability. Thus, if the junction has seven exits the drunkard will go to each one with probability one seventh. This is a random walk on a graph. Will our drunkard reach his home? It turns out that under rather mild conditions, the answer is still yes. For example, if the lengths of all the blocks are between a and b (where a and b are any two finite positive numbers), then the drunkard will, almost surely, reach his home. Notice that we do not assume that the graph is planar, i.e. the city may contain tunnels and bridges. One way to prove this result is using the connection to electrical networks. Take a map of the city and place a one ohm resistor on every block. Now measure the "resistance between a point and infinity". In other words, choose some number R and take all the points in the electrical network with distance bigger than R from our point and wire them together. This is now a finite electrical network and we may measure the resistance from our point to the wired points. Take R to infinity. The limit is called the resistance between a point and infinity. It turns out that the following is true (an elementary proof can be found in the book by Doyle and Snell):
Theorem: a graph is transient if and only if the resistance between a point and infinity is finite. It is not important which point is chosen if the graph is connected.
In other words, in a transient system, one only needs to overcome a finite resistance to get to infinity from any point. In a recurrent system, the resistance from any point to infinity is infinite.
This characterization of recurrence and transience is very useful, and specifically it allows us to analyze the case of a city drawn in the plane with the distances bounded.
A random walk on a graph is a very special case of a Markov chain. Unlike a general Markov chain, random walk on a graph enjoys a property called time symmetry or reversibility. Roughly speaking, this property, also called the principle of detailed balance, means that the probabilities to traverse a given path in one direction or in the other have a very simple connection between them (if the graph is regular, they are just equal). This property has important consequences.
Starting in the 1980s, much research has gone into connecting properties of the graph to random walks. In addition to the electrical network connection described above, there are important connections to isoperimetric inequalities, see more here, functional inequalities such as Sobolev and Poincaré inequalities and properties of solutions of Laplace's equation. A significant portion of this research was focused on Cayley graphs of finitely generated groups. For example, the proof of Dave Bayer and Persi Diaconis that 7 riffle shuffles are enough to mix a pack of cards (see more details under shuffle) is in effect a result about random walk on the group Sn, and the proof uses the group structure in an essential way. In many cases these discrete results carry over to, or are derived from Manifolds and Lie groups.
A good reference for random walk on graphs is the online book by Aldous and Fill For groups see the book of Woess. If the graph itself is random, this topic is called "random walk in random environment" — see the book of Hughes.
Brownian motion is the scaling limit of random walk in dimension 1. This means that if you take a random walk with very small steps you get an approximation to Brownian motion. To be more precise, if the step size is ε, one needs to take a walk of length L/ε² to approximate a Brownian motion of length L. As the step size tends to 0 (and the number of steps increased comparatively) random walk converges to Brownian motion in an appropriate sense. Formally, if B is the space of all paths of length L with the maximum topology, and if M is the space of measure over B with the norm topology, then the convergence is in the space M. Similarly, Brownian motion in several dimensions is the scaling limit of random walk in the same number of dimensions. Note that Brownian motion in the present article refers to the mathematical definition of the term, rather than the actual physical phenomenon of a minute particle diffusing in a fluid.
A random walk is a discrete fractal, but Brownian motion is a true fractal, and there is a connection between the two. For example, take a random walk until it hits a circle of radius r times the step length. The average number of steps it performs is r². This fact is the discrete version of the fact that Brownian motion is a fractal of Hausdorff dimension 2 . In two dimensions, the average number of points the same random walk has on the boundary of its trajectory is . This corresponds to the fact that the boundary of the trajectory of Brownian motion is a fractal of dimension 4/3, a fact predicted by Mandelbrot using simulations but proved only in 2000 (Science, 2000).
Brownian motion enjoys many symmetries random walk does not. For example, Brownian motion is invariant to rotations, but random walk is not, since the underlying grid is not (random walk is invariant to rotations by 90 degrees, but Brownian motion is invariant to rotations by, for example, 17 degrees too). This means that in many cases, problems on random walk are easier to solve by translating them to Brownian motion, solving the problem there, and then translating back. On the other hand, some problems are easier to solve with random walks due to its discrete nature.
Random walk and Brownian motion can be coupled, namely manifested on the same probability space in a dependent way that forces them to be quite close. The simplest such coupling is the Skorokhod embedding, but other, more precise couplings exist as well.
The convergence of a random walk toward the Brownian motion is controlled by the central limit theorem. For a particle in a known fixed position at t=0, the theorem tells us that after a large number of independent steps in the random walk, the walker's position is distributed according to a normal distribution of total variance:
This corresponds to the Green function of the diffusion equation that controls the Brownian motion, which demonstrates that, after a large number of steps, the random walk converges toward a Brownian motion.
In 3D, the variance corresponding to the Green's function of the diffusion equation is:
By equalizing this quantity with the variance associated to the position of the random walker, one obtains the equivalent diffusion coefficient to be considered for the asymptotic Brownian motion toward which the random walk converges after a large number of steps:
Remark: the two expressions of the variance above correspond to the distribution associated to the vector that links the two ends of the random walk, in 3D. The variance associated to each component , or is only one third of this value (still in 3D).
There are a number of interesting models of random paths in which each step depends on the past in a complicated manner. All are more difficult to analyze than the usual random walk — some notoriously so. For example
In all these cases, random walk is often substituted for Brownian motion.
A one-dimensional random walk can also be looked at as a Markov chain whose state space is given by the integers , for some number , . We can call it a random walk because we may think of it as being a model for an individual walking on a straight line who at each point of time either takes one step to the right with probability or one step to the left with probability .
A random walk is a simple stochastic process.