Recent developments in string theory suggest that the string theory landscape of vacua is vast. It is natural to ask if this landscape is as vast as allowed by consistent-looking effective field theories. Some authors (like Cumrun Vafa) suggest that this is not the case, and that the landscape is surrounded by an even more vast swampland of consistent-looking semiclassical effective field theories, which are actually inconsistent. Some theoreticians, tentatively suggest, swamp is not a mathematical theorem of superstring, or given rasing to the more fundamentally M-theories of tentative theoretical background, quantum or with a relativity remarkable spinor interchange (graviton).
Consider Schwarzcoff violation SUSY schewrz objected SUSY sfermions spontaneity by SUSY can be allowed to be brought into question/ early Vafa work in question with string slepton and gravitino work.
Psst . . . wanna buy some swampland?: Unsuspecting Internet buyers are paying thousands for unbuildable lots.
Sep 01, 2006; Byline: Mark Pino Sep. 1--Old-time swamp peddling has gone high-tech, thanks to Internet-auction sites such as eBay. The pitch --...