Added to Favorites

Related Searches

This article is currently under renovation, and may, at times, appear disjoint. Please see the Discussion Page

The pressure distribution over the body surface exert a normal forces which, summed and projected into the freestream direction, represent the drag force due to pressure $D\_\{pr\}$. The nature of these normal forces combines shock wave effects, vortex system generation effects and wake viscous mechanisms all together.

When the viscosity effect over the pressure distribution is considered separately, the resultant drag force is namely pressure drag or, alternatively, form drag. In the absence of viscosity, the pressure forces on the vehicle cancel each other and, hence, the drag is zero. Pressure drag is the dominant component in the case of vehicles with regions of separated flow, in which the pressure recovery is fairly ineffective.

The friction drag force, which is a tangential force on the aircraft surface, depends substantially on boundary layer configuration and viscosity. The calculated friction drag $D\_f$ utilizes the x-projection of the viscous stress tensor evaluated on each discretized body surface.

The sum of friction drag and pressure (form) drag is called viscous drag. This drag component takes into account the influence of viscosity. In a thermodynamic perspective, viscous effects represent irreversible phenomena and, therefore, they create entropy. The calculated viscous drag $D\_v$ use entropy changes to accurately predict the drag force.

When the airplane produces lift, another drag component comes in. Induced drag, symbolized $D\_i$, comes about due to a modification on the pressure distribution due to the trailing vortex system that accompanies the lift production. Induced drag tends to be the most important component for airplanes during take-off or landing flight. Other drag component, namely wave drag, $D\_w$, comes about from shock waves in transonic and supersonic flight speeds. The shock waves induce changes in the boundary layer and pressure distribution over the body surface. It is worth noting that not only viscous effects but also shock waves induce irreversible phenomena and, as a consequence, they can be measured through entropy changes along the domain as well. Figure ref{DragBreakDown} is a summary of the various aspects previously discussed.

The drag force calculation can be performed using the integral of force balance in the freestream direction as

$int\_\{S=S\_\{infty\}+S\_D+S\_A\}left[rho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}right)\; vec\{i\}\; -\; vec\{tau\}\_\{x\}right].vec\{n\}dS,=,0$

which surrounds the body represents the union of two unconnected surfaces,

$S\; =\; underbrace\{S\_\{A\}\}\_\{Aircraft,Surf.\};+;underbrace\{S\_\{D\}+S\_\{infty\}\}\_\{Far,Surf.\}$

where $S\_\{A\}$ is the airplane surface, $S\_\{D\}$ is the outlet surface and $S\_\{infty\}$ represents both the lateral and inlet surfaces. In general, the far-field control volume is located in the boundaries of the domain $(V)$ and its choice is user-defined. In Subsection ref{sGF}, further considerations concerning to the correct selection of the far-field boundary are given, allowing for desired flow characteristics.

Equation (ref{ta1}) can be decomposed into two surface integrals, yielding

$int\_\{S\_\{A\}\}left[rho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}right)\; vec\{i\}\; -vec\{tau\}\_\{x\}right],.,vec\{n\},dS\; =-int\_\{S\_\{D\}+S\_\{infty\}\}left[rho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}right)\; vec\{i\}\; -vec\{tau\}\_\{x\}right],.,vec\{n\},dS$

The right-hand side integral in Eq. (ref{ta2}) represents the reaction forces of the airplane. The left-hand side integral in Eq.
(ref{ta2}) represents the total force exerted by the fluid. Mathematically, these two integrals are equivalent. However, the
numerical integration of these terms will hardly lead to the same result, because the solution is approximated. In the terminology of
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), when the integration is performed using the left-hand side integral in Eq. (ref{ta2}), the
near-field method is employed. On the other hand, when the integration of the right-hand side in Eq. (ref{ta2}) is computed,
the far-field method is considered.

The drag force balance is assured mathematically by Eq. (ref{ta2}), that is, the resultant drag force evaluated using the
near-field approach must be equal to the drag force extracted by the far-field approach. The correct drag breakdown considered in this
work is

$underbrace\{D\_f\; +\; D\_\{pr\}\}\_\{near-field\}\; =\; underbrace\{D\_i\; +\; D\_w\; +\; D\_v\}\_\{far-field\}$

- Anderson, John D. Jr. Introduction to Flight Fourth Edition Boston, Massachusetts: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2000.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia © 2001-2006 Wikipedia contributors (Disclaimer)

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

Last updated on Thursday July 17, 2008 at 13:06:28 PDT (GMT -0700)

View this article at Wikipedia.org - Edit this article at Wikipedia.org - Donate to the Wikimedia Foundation

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

Last updated on Thursday July 17, 2008 at 13:06:28 PDT (GMT -0700)

View this article at Wikipedia.org - Edit this article at Wikipedia.org - Donate to the Wikimedia Foundation

Copyright © 2014 Dictionary.com, LLC. All rights reserved.