sex crime

Sex-related court cases in the United States

The United States Supreme Court and various U.S. state courts have decided several cases regarding pornography, sexual activity, and reproductive rights. The trend has been one of courts striking down states' attempts to regulate sex.

The following is a list of noteworthy sex-related court cases in order by date. (Note that in the legal sense, the term "sodomy" often applies not only to anal sex but also to oral sex and other sex acts.)

  • Buck v. Bell, *. A law which allowed the state to sterilize the mentally retarded is constitutional.
  • Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williamson, *. A law punishing certain classes of criminals with sterilization is unconstitutional.
  • Poe v. Ullman, *. In the absence of an actual threat of prosecution, plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Connecticut law making use of contraceptives illegal.
  • McLaughlin v. Florida, *. The law prohibiting an unmarried interracial couple from habitually living in and occupying the same room in the nighttime that does not apply to couples of the same race violates equal protection clause.
  • Griswold v. Connecticut, , 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 *. Laws prohibititing the distribution of condoms to married persons are unconstitutional.
  • Stanley v. Georgia, *. Mere possession of obscene material in one's home cannot be made a crime.
  • Eisenstadt v. Baird, *. Overturned Massachusetts law that made the giving of contraceptives to unmarried persons a felony.
  • Roe v. Wade, *. A woman may have an abortion during the first 3 months of pregnancy and laws prohibiting this are unconstitutional.
  • Doe v. Bolton, , *. Decided on the same day as Roe, Georgia state abortion statute also ruled unconstitutional.
  • Miller v. California, *. For a publication to be considered obscene, taken as a whole, it must appear to "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", to appeal to the prurient interest, depict sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
  • Jenkins v. Georgia, *. Theatre manager's conviction of "the crime of distributing obscene material" for showing the film Carnal Knowledge overtuned as the film is not obscene.
  • Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, A law that prohibits releasing the name of a rape victim is generally unconstitutional.
  • State of Iowa v. Robert Eugene Pilcher, 242 N.W.2d 348 (Iowa 1976)*. A law against consensual sodomy with someone not one's spouse is unconstitutional.
  • Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney of Richmond, 425 U.S. 901, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976)*. U.S. Supreme Court gave summary decision which sustained lower court's finding that Virginia's Sodomy statute is constitutional.
  • State of New Jersey v. Saunders, 381 A.2d 333 (N.J. 1977)*. A statute prohibiting fornication (sex between unmarried persons) is unconstitutional.
  • Carey v. Population Services International, *. Statute prohibiting sale or distribution of contraceptives to a minor under 16; for anyone other than a licensed pharmacist to distribute contraceptives to persons 16 or over; and for anyone, including licensed pharmacists, to advertise or display contraceptives, is unconstitutional.
  • Stump v. Sparkman, *. A judge who ordered the sterilization of an allegedly retarded young woman was immune from civil suit even though he did not hold a hearing to receive evidence or appoint an attorney to represent the woman's interests.
  • People v. Onofre, 415 N.E.2d 936 (N.Y. 1980) *. A New York law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional.
  • Commonwealth v. Sefranka, 414 N.E.2d 602, (Mass. 1980) *. The term "lewd, wanton and lascivious person" used in a Massachusetts sex crime statute was unconstitutionally vague as it applied to consenting adults.
  • Commonwealth v. Bonadio, 490 Pa. 91, 415 A.2d 47 (Pa. 1980)*. A Pennsylvania law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional. (The state would repeal the law 15 years later.)
  • Baker v. Wade, 553 F. Supp. 1121 (N.D.Tex. 1982) *. Federal District Court finds Texas Sodomy Law unconstitutional; Court of Appeals for the fifth Circuit overturns and holds law to be constitutional.
  • Dronenburg v. Zech, 741 F.2d 1388 (D.C.Cir.1984) *. Administrative discharge from U.S. Navy for homosexual conduct is valid because private, consensual, homosexual conduct is not constitutionally protected.
  • Bowers v. Hardwick, *. Sodomy in the privacy of one's home may be made illegal. (The statute was later struck down on State Constitutional grounds; see Powell v. Georgia below. This case was later overturned; see Lawrence v. Texas below.)
  • Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. v. Casey, *. Certain abortion restrictions are valid.
  • State v. Morales, 826 S.W.2d 201 (1992) *. Texas statute that criminalizes private sexual relations between consenting adults of the same sex is unconstitutional.
  • Commonwealth v. Wasson, 842 S.W.2d 487 (1992)*. A Kentucky law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional.
  • City of Dallas v. England, 846 S.W.2d 957; 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 451, (1993) * Citing State v. Morales, Texas state appellate court affirms lower court decision finding prohibition on hiring gays and lesbians as police officers unconstitional.
  • State of Idaho v. Holden, 890 P.2d 341 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995)*. A statute prohibiting private consensual oral sodomy between married persons is unconstitutional, because it infringes upon the constitutional right of privacy.
  • Campbell v. Sundquist, 926 S.W.2d 250 (Tn.App.1996)*. A Tennessee law against consensual sodomy is unconstitutional.
  • Gryczan v. Montana, 96-202, 942 P.2d 112 (1997)*. The Montana State Supreme Court finds law against consensual sodomy unconstitutional.
  • Powell v. Georgia (actually Powell v. State), S98A0755, 270 Ga. 327, 510 S.E. 2d 18 (1998)*. The Georgia State Supreme Court finds the very law making consensual sodomy a crime which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bowers to be unconstitutional as violating the state Constitution's privacy protections.
  • Williams v. Maryland (actually Williams v. State), Baltimore City Circuit Court, January 14, 1999. State of Maryland agrees to court order declaring its law forbidding consensual sodomy unconstitutional.
  • Doe v. Ventura, No. MC 01-489, 2001 WL 543734 (Minn. Dist. Ct 2001) Minnesota sodomy law found to violate state constitutional right to privacy, in cases where it is private, consensual, and non-commercial.
  • Jegley v. Picado, 349 Ark. 600, 80 S.W.3d 332 (2002) *. Supreme Court of Arkansas finds state's sodomy law unconstitutional.
  • GLAD v. Attorney General, SJC-08539 (Mass. Supreme Judicial Ct. 2002) Massachusetts sodomy law declared unconstitutional.
  • Lawrence v. Texas, , 02-102 *. A Texas law making sodomy with same-sex partner illegal, but not with opposite sex, is unconstitutional. This case expressly overturns Bowers v. Hardwick.
  • Martin v. Ziherl, 607 S.E.2d 367 (Va. 2005). The Supreme Court of Virginia rules that the state criminal prohibition of sex between unmarried individuals (fornication) are unconstitutional in light of Lawrence v. Texas.

See also landmark case

Search another word or see sex crimeon Dictionary | Thesaurus |Spanish
Copyright © 2015, LLC. All rights reserved.
  • Please Login or Sign Up to use the Recent Searches feature