Einstein is an open source forth generation programming language (4GL) written on top of the Deesel 3GL programming language. It is a flow based programming language supporting message based constructs such as:
The language is built around integration of multiple systems, parallel and distributed execution.
resource "time(schedule=cron):0/10 * * * * ?" everyTenSeconds;
resource "time(schedule=cron):0/1 * * * * ?" everySecond;
resource "stack:TimeStack" stack;
(<< "time:yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ" ) >> "std:The time according to Einstein is ";
listen everyTenSeconds "bool:true" (read all stack >> "std:");
listen everySecond "bool:true" (write stack);
Resources can best be compared to variables in 3GLs a resource is identified by a URI.URIs can best be compared to types in Java they are (mostly) static, refer to actual resources and can provide functionality. Best, because Einstein is not a 3GL, similarities can be quite superficial.
So a URI in Einstein could look like:
All data in Einstein takes the form of a message. A message contains a payload and associated metadata which relates to such concerns as routing, security and so on. The payload takes the form of a DataObject, DataObject’s are a means to interact with payloads without knowing the nature of the data in the payload. So one may query, join, split, etc a payload without knowing whether it is XML or an object graph. This abstraction is essential to allow the instructions and operators of the language to perform the same operations no matter what data it is dealing with. Once you have written a splitting router for example (by combining the split and route instructions) it will do that operation to any data it receives, improving re-use.
Messages themselves do not directly expose their state, an action must be passed to a message, and depending on the action, the appropriate state is passed back to the action. This inversion of control helps to make sure that, as much as possible, the interactions with a message can be audited. This allows for easy auditing and debugging of a message’s lifecycle.
Einstein has three different types of execution groups: sequential, list and map. The primary reasons for the fours groups are to support parallel processing and routing.
The braces denote a sequential block, in a sequential block the result of the previous instruction is the input to the next instruction.tuple based execution group allows instructions to be invoked independently of each other with the combined results being available after execution. For example:
[read "text:1", read "text:2", read "text:3"]
Will produce a tuple of ["1","2","3"]; the order of execution is not guaranteed and may or may not be parallel, the order of the results is guaranteed to match the order of the instructions. The input for each instruction is the result of the previous sequential operation.
route "java:org.me.MyRouter" [
red : write "jms://redQueue",
blue : write "http://blueserver.com/Service"
But also a Map based group can be executed directly:
[red : get "text:roses", blue : read "text:violets" ]
In the above example the result would be a map of ["red":"roses", "blue" : "violets"]. Maps are essentially named tuples.
A competing group has all instructions executed at the potentially the same time; however, unlike tuples, the value of the group is the first result returned, not the combined results. This is useful when accessing multiple resources for the same data (e.g. price feeds).
(read “http://myfirstserver.com/PriceFeed”, read “http://mysecondserver.com/PriceFeed” )
Execution Models are another very important aspect of Einstein, they provide an abstraction of how instructions will be executed. Execution models can be entirely user defined - allowing the potential for Einstein to execute on a variety of different platforms - from simple, direct execution through SEDA to grid/fabric models. Execution Models themselves provide the model for distributed variables, stacks, execution and communication - all the features of a system are affected by the Execution Model.
The Execution Model specifically provides means for performing these actions:
• Executing one or more instructions. • Iterating over a data set with one or more instructions. • Manipulating a stack which relates to the means of execution. • Manipulating variables in a way which relates to the means of execution.
Why would you require multiple data models? Well unlike a low level programming language Einstein is designed to work across multiple processors and physical nodes. The reason for that is, simply, that applications designed to scale need to spread across all processing resources available to them - but not all applications and not all parts of applications need to scale in the same way. If you need to do a fast local iteration you don't want the instructions to be executed in the same way as the parts of the application that are distributed across a grid of processing nodes.
The most common execution models are : immediate/direct, multi-threaded and distributed.
US Patent Issued to Navosha on Jan. 24 for "Linking Functional Blocks for Sequential Operation by Done and Go Components of Respective Blocks Pointing to Same Memory Location to Store Completion Indicator Read as Start Indicator" (California Inventors)
Jan 26, 2012; ALEXANDRIA, Va., Jan. 26 -- United States Patent no. 8,103,855, issued on Jan. 24, was assigned to Navosha Corp. (Sunnyvale,...
US Patent Issued to GM Global Technology Operations on Oct. 22 for "Compound Shutter System with Independent and Non-Sequential Operation" (Michigan Inventors)
Oct 22, 2013; ALEXANDRIA, Va., Oct. 22 -- United States Patent no. 8,561,738, issued on Oct. 22, was assigned to GM Global Technology...
Devolatilization: a critical sequential operation for in situ compatibilization of immiscible polymer blends by one-step reactive extrusion.
Mar 15, 1996; INTRODUCTION Multiphase polymer blends are of great importance in the development of new polymeric materials. A usable polymer...