Quantum gravity is the field of theoretical physics attempting to unify quantum mechanics, which describes three of the fundamental forces of nature (electromagnetism, weak interaction, and strong interaction), with general relativity, the theory of the fourth fundamental force: gravity. One ultimate goal hoped to emerge as a result of this is a unified framework for all fundamental forces— called a "theory of everything" (TOE).
Overview
Much of the difficulty in merging these theories at all energy scales comes from the different assumptions that these theories make on how the universe works.
Quantum field theory depends on particle fields embedded in the flat spacetime of
special relativity.
General relativity models gravity as a curvature within
spacetime that changes as a gravitational mass moves. Historically, the most obvious way of combining the two (such as treating gravity as simply another particle field) ran quickly into what is known as the
renormalization problem. In the oldfashioned understanding of renormalization, gravity particles would attract each other and adding together all of the interactions results in many infinite values which cannot easily be cancelled out mathematically to yield sensible, finite results. This is in contrast with
quantum electrodynamics where, while the series still do not converge, the interactions sometimes evaluate to infinite results, but those are few enough in number to be removable via renormalization.
Effective field theories
In recent decades, however, this antiquated understanding of
renormalization has given way to the modern idea of
effective field theory. All quantum field theories come with some highenergy cutoff, beyond which we do not expect that the theory provides a good description of nature. The "infinities" then become large but finite quantities proportional to this finite cutoff scale, and correspond to processes that involve very high energies near the fundamental cutoff. These quantities can then be absorbed into an infinite collection of coupling constants, and at energies well below the fundamental cutoff of the theory, to any desired precision; only a finite number of these coupling constants need to be measured in order to make legitimate quantummechanical predictions. This same logic works just as well for the highly successful theory of lowenergy
pions as for quantum gravity. Indeed, the first quantummechanical corrections to
graviton
scattering and
Newton's law of gravitation have been explicitly computed (although they are so astronomically small that we may never be able to measure them), and any more fundamental theory of nature would need to replicate these results in order to be taken seriously. In fact, gravity is in many ways a much better quantum field theory than the
Standard Model, since it appears to be valid all the way up to its cutoff at the
Planck scale. (By comparison, the Standard Model is expected to start to break down above its cutoff at the much smaller scale of around 1000
GeV.)
While confirming that quantum mechanics and gravity are indeed consistent at reasonable energies (in fact, the complete structure of gravity can be shown to arise automatically from the quantum mechanics of spin2 massless particles), this way of thinking makes clear that near or above the fundamental cutoff of our effective quantum theory of gravity (the cutoff is generally assumed to be of order the Planck scale), a new model of nature will be needed. That is, in the modern way of thinking, the problem of combining quantum mechanics and gravity becomes an issue only at very high energies, and may well require a totally new kind of model.
Quantum gravity theory for the highest energy scales
The general approach taken in deriving a theory of quantum gravity that is valid at even the highest energy scales is to assume that the underlying theory will be simple and elegant and then to look at current theories for symmetries and hints for how to combine them elegantly into an overarching theory. One problem with this approach is that it is not known if quantum gravity will be a simple and elegant theory (that resolves the conundrum of
special and
general relativity with regard to the
uniformity of acceleration and gravity, in the former case and
spacetime curvature in the latter case).
Such a theory is required in order to understand those problems involving the combination of very large mass or energy and very small dimensions of space, such as the behavior of black holes, and the origin of the universe.
Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity
The graviton
At present, one of the deepest problems in theoretical physics is harmonizing the theory of
general relativity, which describes gravitation, and applies to largescale structures (
stars,
planets,
galaxies), with
quantum mechanics, which describes the other three
fundamental forces acting on the
atomic scale. This problem must be put in the proper context, however. In particular, contrary to the popular claim that quantum mechanics and general relativity are fundamentally incompatible, one can demonstrate that the structure of general relativity essentially follows inevitably from the quantum mechanics of interacting
theoretical spin2 massless particles (called
gravitons).
While there is no concrete proof of the existence of gravitons, all quantized theories of matter necessitate their existence. Supporting this theory is the observation that all other fundamental forces have one or more messenger particles, except gravity, leading researchers to believe that at least one most likely does exist; they have dubbed these hypothetical particles gravitons. Many of the accepted notions of a unified theory of physics since the 1970s, including string theory, superstring theory, Mtheory, loop quantum gravity, all assume, and to some degree depend upon, the existence of the graviton. Many researchers view the detection of the graviton as vital to validating their work. CERN plans to dedicate a large timeshare to search for the graviton using the Large Hadron Collider.
Nonrenormalizability of gravity
Historically, many believed that general relativity was in fact fundamentally inconsistent with quantum mechanics. General relativity, like
electromagnetism, is a
classical field theory. One might expect that, as with electromagnetism, there should be a corresponding
quantum field theory.
However, gravity is nonrenormalizable. For a quantum field theory to be welldefined according to this understanding of the subject, it must be asymptotically free or asymptotically safe. The theory must be characterized by a choice of finitely many parameters, which could, in principle, be set by experiment. For example, in quantum electrodynamics, these parameters are the charge and mass of the electron, as measured at a particular energy scale.
On the other hand, in quantizing gravity, there are infinitely many independent parameters needed to define the theory. For a given choice of those parameters, one could make sense of the theory, but since we can never do infinitely many experiments to fix the values of every parameter, we do not have a meaningful physical theory:
 At low energies, the logic of the renormalization group tells us that, despite the unknown choices of these infinitely many parameters, quantum gravity will reduce to the usual Einstein theory of general relativity.
 On the other hand, if we could probe very high energies where quantum effects take over, then every one of the infinitely many unknown parameters would begin to matter, and we could make no predictions at all.
As explained below, there is a way around this problem by treating QG as an effective field theory.
Any meaningful theory of quantum gravity that makes sense and is predictive at all energy scales must have some deep principle that reduces the infinitely many unknown parameters to a finite number that can then be measured.
 One possibility is that normal perturbation theory is not a reliable guide to the renormalizability of the theory, and that there really is a UV fixed point for gravity. Since this is a question of nonperturbative quantum field theory, it is difficult to find a reliable answer, but some people still pursue this option.
 Another possibility is that there are new symmetry principles that constrain the parameters and reduce them to a finite set. This is the route taken by string theory, where all of the excitations of the string essentially manifest themselves as new symmetries.
QG as an effective field theory
In an
effective field theory, all but the first few of the infinite set of parameters in a nonrenormalizable theory are suppressed by huge energy scales and hence can be neglected when computing lowenergy effects. Thus, at least in the lowenergy regime, the model is indeed a predictive quantum field theory. (A very similar situation occurs for the very similar effective field theory of lowenergy pions.) Furthermore, many theorists agree that even the Standard Model should really be regarded as an effective field theory as well, with "nonrenormalizable" interactions suppressed by large energy scales and whose effects have consequently not been observed experimentally.
Recent work has shown that by treating general relativity as an effective field theory, one can actually make legitimate predictions for quantum gravity, at least for lowenergy phenomena. An example is the wellknown calculation of the tiny firstorder quantummechanical correction to the classical Newtonian gravitational potential between two masses. Such predictions would need to be replicated by any candidate theory of highenergy quantum gravity.
Spacetime background dependence
A fundamental lesson of general relativity is that there is no fixed spacetime background, as found in
Newtonian mechanics and
special relativity; the spacetime geometry is dynamic. While easy to grasp in principle, this is the hardest idea to understand about general relativity, and its consequences are profound and not fully explored, even at the classical level. To a certain extent, general relativity can be seen to be a
relational theory, in which the only physically relevant information is the relationship between different events in spacetime.
On the other hand, quantum mechanics has depended since its inception on a fixed background (nondynamical) structure. In the case of quantum mechanics, it is time that is given and not dynamic, just as in Newtonian classical mechanics. In relativistic quantum field theory, just as in classical field theory, Minkowski spacetime is the fixed background of the theory.
String theory
String theory started out as a generalization of quantum field theory where instead of point particles, stringlike objects propagate in a fixed spacetime background. Although string theory had its origins in the study of quark confinement and not of quantum gravity, it was soon discovered that the string spectrum contains the graviton, and that "condensation" of certain vibration modes of strings is equivalent to a modification of the original background. In this sense, string perturbation theory exhibits exactly the features one would expect of a perturbation theory that may exhibit a strong dependence on asymptotics (as seen, for example, in the AdS/CFT correspondence) which is a weak form of background dependence.
Background independent theories
Loop quantum gravity is the fruit of an effort to formulate a
backgroundindependent quantum theory.
Topological quantum field theory provided an example of backgroundindependent quantum theory, but with no local degrees of freedom, and only finitely many degrees of freedom globally. This is inadequate to describe gravity in 3+1 dimensions which has local degrees of freedom according to general relativity. In 2+1 dimensions, however, gravity is a topological field theory, and it has been successfully quantized in several different ways, including spin networks.
Fields vs particles
Quantum field theory on curved (nonMinkowskian) backgrounds, while not a quantum theory of gravity, has shown that some of the assumptions of quantum field theory cannot be carried over to curved spacetime, let alone to fullblown quantum gravity. In particular, the vacuum, when it exists, is shown to depend on the path of the observer through spacetime (see
Unruh effect).
Also, some argue that in curved spacetime, the field concept is seen to be fundamental over the particle concept (which arises as a convenient way to describe localized interactions). However, since it appears possible to regard curved spacetime as consisting of a condensate of gravitons, there is still some debate over which concept is truly the more fundamental.
Points of tension
There are two other points of tension between quantum mechanics and general relativity.
 First, classical general relativity breaks down at singularities, and quantum mechanics becomes inconsistent with general relativity in a neighborhood of singularities (however, no one is certain that classical general relativity applies near singularities in the first place).
 Second, it is not clear how to determine the gravitational field of a particle, since under the Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics its location and velocity cannot be known with certainty. The resolution of these points may come from a better understanding of general relativity.
Candidate theories
There are a number of proposed quantum gravity theories. Currently, there is still no complete and consistent quantum theory of gravity, and the candidate models still need to overcome major formal and conceptual problems. They also face the common problem that, as yet, there is no way to put quantum gravity predictions to experimental tests, although there is hope for this to change as future data from cosmological observations and particle physics experiments becomes available.
String theory
One suggestive starting point are ordinary quantum field theories which, after all, are successful in describing the other three basic fundamental forces in the context of the standard model of elementary particle physics. However, while this leads to an acceptable effective (quantum) field theory of gravity at low energies, gravity turns out to be much more problematic at higher energies. Where, for ordinary field theories such as quantum electrodynamics, a technique known as renormalization is an integral part of deriving predictions which take into account higherenergy contributions, gravity turns out to be nonrenormalizable: at high energies, applying the recipes of ordinary quantum field theory yields models that are devoid of all predictive power.
One attempt to overcome these limitations is to replace ordinary quantum field theory, which is based on the classical concept of a point particle, with a quantum theory of onedimensional extended objects: string theory. At the energies reached in current experiments, these strings are indistinguishable from pointlike particles, but, crucially, different modes of oscillation of one and the same type of fundamental string appear as particles with different (electric and other) charges. In this way, string theory promises to be a unified description of all particles and interactions. The theory is successful in that one mode will always correspond to a graviton, the messenger particle of gravity; however, the price to pay are unusual features such as six extra dimensions of space in addition to the usual three. In what is called the second superstring revolution, it was conjectured that both string theory and a unification of general relativity and supersymmetry known as supergravity form part of a hypothesized elevendimensional model known as Mtheory, which would constitute a uniquely defined and consistent theory of quantum gravity.
Loop quantum gravity
Another approach to quantum gravity starts with the canonical quantization procedures of quantum theory. Starting with the initialvalueformulation of general relativity (cf. the section on evolution equations, above), the result is an analogue of the Schrödinger equation: the WheelerdeWitt equation which, regrettably, turns out to be illdefined. A major breakthrough came with the introduction of what are now known as Ashtekar variables, which represent geometric gravity using mathematical analogues of electric and magnetic fields. The resulting candidate for a theory of quantum gravity is Loop quantum gravity, in which space is represented by a network structure called a spin network, evolving over time in discrete steps.
Other candidates
There are a number of other approaches to quantum gravity. The approaches differ depending on which features of general relativity and quantum theory are accepted unchanged, and which features are modified. Examples include:
WeinbergWitten theorem
There is a theorem in
quantum field theory called the
WeinbergWitten theorem which places some constraints on theories of
composite gravity/
emergent gravity.
In popular culture
See also
Notes
References
 year=2007
}}
 doi=10.1088/02649381/21/15/R01
}}
 doi=10.1088/00344885/64/8/301
}}
 editorlast=Cornet
 editorfirst=Fernando
 title=Effective Theories: Proceedings of the Advanced School, Almunecar, Spain, 26 June–1 July 1995
 isbn=9810229089
}}
}}
 doi=10.1088/02649381/17/5/321
}}

}}
}}
 editorfirst=Andres
 editorlast=Gomberoff
 editor2first=Donald
 editor2last=Marolf
 title=Lectures on Quantum Gravity
 year=2005
 publisher=Springer
 isbn=0387239952
}}
 journal=Int. J. Theor. Phys.
 volume=36
 year=1997
 pages=2759–2781
 doi=10.1007/BF02435709
}}
}}
}}
External links