For the standard normal distribution (often denoted N(0,1)), the CDF is commonly denoted . is a continuous, monotone increasing sigmoid function whose domain is the real line and range is (0,1). As an example, consider the familiar fact that the N(0,1) distribution places 95% of probability between -1.96 and 1.96, and is symmetric around zero. It follows that
The probit function gives the 'inverse' computation, generating a value of an N(0,1) random variable, associated with specified cumulative probability. Formally, the probit function is the inverse of , denoted . Continuing the example,
The idea of probit was published in 1934 by Chester Ittner Bliss (1899-1979) in an article in Science on how to treat data such as the percentage of a pest killed by a pesticide. Bliss proposed transforming the percentage killed into a "probability unit" (or "probit") which was linearly related to the modern definition (he defined it arbitrarily as equal to 0 for 0.0001 and 10 for 0.9999). He included a table to aid other researchers to convert their kill percentages to his probit, which they could then plot against the logarithm of the dose and thereby, it was hoped, obtain a more or less straight line. Such a so-called probit model is still important in toxicology, as well as other fields. The approach is justified in particular if response variation can be rationalized as a lognormal distribution of tolerances among subjects on test, where the tolerance of a particular subject is the dose just sufficient for the response of interest.
The method introduced by Bliss was carried forward in an important text on toxicological applications by D. J. Finney. Values tabled by Finney can be derived from probits as defined here by adding a value of 5. This distinction is summarized by Collett (p. 55): "The original definition of a probit [with 5 added was] primarily to avoid having to work with negative probits; ... This definition is still used in some quarters, but in the major statistical software packages for what is referred to as probit analysis, probits are defined without the addition of 5." It should be observed that probit methodology, including numerical optimization for fitting of probit functions, was introduced before widespread availability of electronic computing. When using tables, it was convenient to have probits uniformly positive. Common areas of application do not require positive probits.
The normal distribution CDF and its inverse are not available in closed form, and computation requires careful use of numerical procedures. However, the functions are widely available in software for statistics and probability modeling, and in spreadsheets. In computing environments where numerical implementations of the inverse error function are available, the probit function may be obtained as
Another means of computation is based on forming a non-linear ordinary differential equation for probit. Abbreviating the probit function as , the ODE is
with the centre (boundary) conditions
This equation may be solved by several methods, including the classical power series approach. From this solutions of arbitrarily high accuracy may be developed based on Steinbrecher's approach to the series for the inverse error function. The power series solution is given by
where the coefficients satisfy the non-linear recurrence
with . In this form the ratio as .
Analogously to the probit model, we may assume that such a quantity is related linearly to a set of predictors, resulting in the logit model, the basis in particular of logistic regression model, the most prevalent form of regression analysis for binary response data. In current statistical practice, probit and logit regression models are often handled as cases of the generalized linear model.
A Spatial Probit Modeling Approach to Account for Spatial Spillover Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys
Feb 01, 2013; We present a demonstration of a Bayesian spatial probit model for a dichotomous choice contingent valuation method...
Forecasting U.S. Recessions with Probit Stepwise Regression Models: The Result Is Better Forecasting Performance
Jan 01, 2008; Recent flatness and eventual inversion of the U.S. yield curve during 2006 led some economists to call for the possibility of a...