Physical space (in many pre-relativistic conceptions) is not only an affine space, but it also has a metric structure and in particular a conformal structure. In general, an affine space need have neither a preferred metric structure nor conformal structure.
The proof is a routine exercise. Here is the punch line: Smith knows the "linear structure", but both Smith and Jones know the "affine structure"—i.e. the values of affine combinations, defined as linear combinations in which the sum of the coefficients is 1. An underlying set with an affine structure is an affine space.
Another way of looking at this is that by forgetting about the zero vector, we're remembering the vector's tail and where it is situated. Denoting the position of the vector's tail by O, the process of adding vectors a and b involves taking the displacements of a and b relative to their tails and applying them sequentially starting from the tail, O. The resulting sum is O + (a − O) + (b − O) = a − O + b. The operation that emerges from this is the ternary affine operation a − b + c.
An affine space is a set with a faithful freely transitive vector space action, i.e. a torsor (or principal homogeneous space) for the vector space.
Alternatively an affine space is a set S, together with a vector space V, and a map
The image is written as a - b and can be thought of as the vector from b to a. The map has the properties that:
By choosing an origin a we can thus identify S with V, hence change S into a vector space.
Conversely, any vector space V is an affine space for vector subtraction.
If O, a and b are points in S and is a real number, then
is independent of O. Instead of arbitrary linear combinations, only such affine combinations of points have meaning.
An affine subspace of a vector space V is a subset closed under affine combinations of vectors in the space. For example, the set
is an affine space, where {vi}i is a family of vectors in V. To see that this is indeed an affine space, observe that this set carries a transitive action of the vector subspace W of V
This vector subspace, and therefore also the affine subspace, is of dimension N–1. This affine subspace can be equivalently described as the coset of the W-action
where p is any element of S.
One might like to define an affine subspace of an affine space as a set closed under affine combinations. However, affine combinations are only defined in vector spaces; one cannot add points of an affine space. Allowing a slightly more abstract definition, one may define an affine subspace of an affine space as a subset that is invariant under an affine transformation.
In affine geometry there is not only no notion of origin, but neither a notion of length nor of angle.
An affine transformation between two vector spaces is a combination of a linear transformation and a translation. For specifying one the origins are used, but the set of affine transformations does not depend on the origins.
The case of the field {0,1} may be dealt with separately, and the resolution for the case of the field {0,1,2} may be captured by modifying identity (3) to
where is a solution to , and is assumed not to be 1.
The following properties may be derived
Property (4) is derived by taking r = 0 in axiom (3) and applying axiom (1).
For (5), the case m = 1 trivial. For m other than 1, we may set r = 1/(1-m), s = 0 and t = 1-m and apply axiom (3),
For (6), the case m = 1 is also trivial. In other cases, we may take r=n/(1-m), s = 1, t = m in axiom (3), which leads directly to the result.
For (7), the cases n = 0 or 1 are trivial. In other cases, we may write r = m/(n(1-n)) and s = t = n, in axiom (3) to directly arrive at the result.
For (8), the cases t = 0 or 1 are trivial. Otherwise, if m(1-t)+nt = 0, one use property (5) to rewrite this as and prove property (8) for this, instead. Otherwise, we may take r = ((1-t)m+tn)/(t(1-t)), s = nt/((1-t)m+nt) and derive the result directly from axiom (3).
For (9), take r = 1/(1-t) and apply axiom (3).
For (10), the case s = 0 follows from (5). Otherwise, one may take r = 1/(s(1-ms)) and t = ms and apply axiom (3), and then property (5).
With these properties in hand, we may show that a vector space may be defined by first selecting a point O to designate as the zero vector and then defining the operations
The second operation may then be proven to be independent of t, ultimately using (9).
The properties of a vector space may be derived and one may prove that with these definitions that reduces to (1-r)A+rB.
From (6), we get .
From (1), we have .
From (2), we have .
From (7), we have .
Using these results, we may employ (9) to show that for s and t other than 0 and 1.
Commutativity of addition then follows from (5) with .
Multiplication of the O vector yields O since , by (4).
The additive identity property then follows with .
Distributivity over vector addition follows with .
Distributivity over scalar addition follows from (8) with .
Associativity follows from (10), with . This requires s and t to be chosen such that neither is 0 nor 1 and such that st is not 1.
Finally, the identification of this operator is established with . The cases r = 0 and r = 1 are handled separately using (0) and (1).
Writing the operation more compactly as AB, the required properties may be more succinctly stated as
from which it is desired to prove that (AB)(CD) = (AC)(BD). Indeed, it is not too difficult to show that the free algebra, defined by these relations, generated by 3 elements {A,B,C} is just {A,B,C,AB,AC,BC,A(BC),B(AC),C(AB)}, which is the 2-dimensional affine space over {0,1,2}. However, the free algebra on 4 elements may not even be finite.
Instead, one may take as the defining postulates
From the last property, one proves that A(BC) = (AA)(BC) = (AB)(AC).
Arbitrarily designating an element E as the identity, one may then define group operations by
Under (G1) and (G2), these operations define a group, with
Thus, (G1) and (G2) define what may be considered as the "affine" generalization of a group. With respect to these definitions, it can then be proven that
Under (G3), one also has commutativity
thus defining Abelian groups. Finally, under (G4), one has
David Kay's description of three dimensional affine space is as follows.