The "blue" team delivered what became known as System 7 on May 13, 1991, but the "pink" team suffered from second-system effect and continued to slip its release into the indefinite future. Some of the reason for this can be traced to problems that would become widespread at Apple as time went on; as "pink" became delayed, engineers on the project jumped ship to work on "blue" instead, leaving the "pink" team constantly struggling for staffing. Management basically ignored these sorts of problems, leading to continual problems with delivering working products. In the case of "pink", development eventually slowed to the point that the project was moribund, and Apple semi-abandoned it by spinning it off to form Taligent.
This left Apple with no ongoing modern operating system development effort. Originally intended to support a single user running a single application on a non-networked monochrome machine with a single floppy disk drive for storage and printing to a dot matrix printer, the existing Mac OS had evolved gracefully into System 7, but simply did not scale well to the increasing demands of users. In particular the architecture of QuickDraw made it very difficult to introduce multitasking into the system, the file system was inefficient for devices with larger storage capacities, and networking support was based almost entirely on a proprietary protocol in an era where TCP/IP was already becoming a de-facto standard. Even the lauded user interface, which seemed so elegant when controlling a small screened, floppy disk-based machine, began to be overwhelmed by gigabyte-capacity hard disks and large, high resolution color monitors.
Several attempts were made by various teams to address these issues with an updated operating system, or at least parts of one, but they ran afoul of internal politics and turf wars. John Sculley, Apple's CEO during this period, largely ignored the engineering departments while he concentrated on sales and marketing.
As System 7.5 was code-named "Mozart", the next-generation operating system that was intended to address the looming architectural issues was dubbed Copland after composer Aaron Copland. Copland was designed to run the Mac OS on top of a microkernel named Nukernel, which would handle basic tasks such as application startup and memory management, leaving all other tasks to a series of semi-special programs known as servers. For instance, networking and file services would not be provided by the kernel itself, but by servers which would be sent requests though interapplication communications. Copland consisted of the combination of Nukernel, various servers, and a suite of application support libraries to provide the well-known Macintosh programming interface.
Application services would be offered through a single program known as the blue box, which essentially encapsulated an existing System 7 operating system inside a single process and address space. Mac programs would run inside the blue box much as they did under System 7, as 'co-operative tasks' that used the non-re-entrant Toolbox calls. A worst-case scenario was that an application in the blue box would crash, taking down the entire box with it. This would not result in the system as a whole going down, however, and the blue box could be restarted.
New applications, those written with Copland in mind, would be able to directly communicate with the new servers and thereby gain many advantages in terms of performance and scalability. They could also communicate with the kernel to "spin off" separate applications or threads, which would run as separate processes in protected memory, as in most modern operating systems. However, these separate applications could not use non-re-entrant calls like QuickDraw, and thus could have no user interface. Apple suggested that larger programs could place their user interface in a normal Macintosh application, which would then start the "work threads" externally. Doing so was not easy, however, as multithreaded code is difficult to write and debug.
Another key feature of Copland was that it would be completely PowerPC "native." System 7 had been ported to the PowerPC (PPC) with great success; large portions of the system ran in PPC code, including both high-level functionality, such as the majority of the user interface "toolbox" managers, and low-level functionality, such as interrupt management. However there was enough 68k code left in the system, and especially user applications, that the operating system had to map certain bits of data between the two systems. Most important among these was the sixteen-level interrupt handlers of the Motorola 68000 series CPU's that were widely used in the Mac OS. These could not be easily removed during the transition to the PPC, so they were mapped from the 16-level system of the 68k to the simpler 2-level system of the PPC. This required an expensive call into the OS to translate them in order to call the correct routines in the OS. This was true even if the code on either side of the interrupt was PPC native, which was increasingly common as more and more of the OS and various applications moved to new compilers. Removing this translation step would allow Copland-native applications to run much faster, as much as 50%, with no special effort on the part of the developers.
The challenge in Copland would be getting all of this to fit functionality into an ordinary Mac. System 7.5 already used up about 2.5 megabytes of RAM, and at the time this was a significant portion of all the RAM available in most machines. Copland would be running what was essentially a complete copy of System 7.5 and an entirely separate operating system running "under" it as well. Copland therefore was to use a Mach-inspired memory management system and rely extensively upon shared libraries, with the goal being for Copland to be only some 50% larger than 7.5.
There were also a number of features that were not a part of the basic Copland system. Notably, Copland did not directly support multithreading in the original Mac OS libraries, although programs could be written that directly interacted with the kernel to get these services (the server processes made use of this, for instance). Additionally, Nukernel did not support symmetric multiprocessing, meaning it could not natively utilize more than one processor on a multi-processor system. Both of these features were expected of a modern operating system, but for Copland it was felt that it was more important to get the new API out to developers so they could start moving their applications over to the new system. By the time these capabilities were ready, a good portion of the application base should already be running on the platform.
The plan was that, over time, more and more of the existing non-re-entrant code would be ported to new libraries or servers. Eventually it would become possible that new applications written to these interfaces would be able to be run completely separately as their own tasks. Additionally these applications would be ready to support multiprocessor systems if and when these became available. The follow-on system supporting these features became known internally as Gershwin.
As had happened in the past during the development of Blue/Pink, developers within Apple soon started abandoning their own projects in order to work on the new system. Middle management and project leaders fought back, by putting their own project "into" Copland in an attempt to ensure it could not be canceled and their employees "removed" to work on Copland. This process took on momentum over the next year.
Soon the project looked less like a new operating system and more like a huge collection of new technologies; QuickDraw GX, SOM and OpenDoc became core components of the system, while completely unrelated technologies like a new file management dialog box (the "open dialog") and "themes" support appeared as well. The feature list grew much faster than the features could be completed, a classic case of creeping featuritis. As the "package" grew, any hope of testing it thoroughly became increasingly difficult.
At WWDC '96 Apple's new CEO, Gil Amelio, talked exclusively about Copland, now known as System 8. He repeatedly stated that it was the only focus of Apple engineering. Amelio announced that it would ship to developers only a few months later at the end of the summer, with a full release planned for late fall. Very few, if any, demos of the running system were shown at the conference. Instead what was demonstrated were various pieces of the technology and the user interface that would go into the package, such as a new file management dialog. Little of the technology of the core system was demonstrated; the new file system that had been shown a year earlier was absent here. After a number of people at the show complained about the lack of sophistication of the microkernel, notably the lack of symmetric multiprocessing - a bedrock feature that would be exceedingly difficult to add on to an already existing system within a few months. Amelio came back on stage at the end of the show and announced that they would be adding that to the feature list.
In August 1996, 'Developer Release 0' was sent to a small number of selected partners. Far from demonstrating improved stability, it often crashed after doing nothing at all, and was completely unusable for development. In October, Apple moved the target delivery date to 'sometime,' hinting that it might be 1997. One of the groups most surprised by the announcement was Apple's own hardware team, who had been waiting for Copland to allow the PowerPC to truly shine. Members of Apple's software QA team suggested, jokingly, that given current resources and the number of bugs in the system they could clear the program for shipping some time around 2030.
After a few months on the job, Hancock came to the conclusion that the situation was hopeless; given current development and engineering, she thought Copland would never ship at all. She suggested that development continue on the existing Mac OS to improve its stability, while looking outside the company for a new operating system.
Apple officially canceled Copland in August 1996. While the CD envelopes for the developer's release had been printed, the discs themselves had not been mastered. Among the reasons given for the cancellation were the slow pace of development and the many technical problems remaining to be solved. One of the larger technical hurdles for developers was the need for two PowerPC-based computers simply to install and use the operating system. The two computers would be linked by a serial cable while the software was installed using Open Firmware commands.
Following Hancock's plan, development of System 7.5 continued with a number of technologies originally slated for Copland being incorporated into the base OS. Apple embarked on a buying campaign, acquiring the rights to various third-party system enhancements and integrating them into the OS. The Extensions Manager, hierarchal Apple menu, collapsing windows, the menu bar clock, sticky notes - all were developed outside of Apple. Stability and performance was improved by Mac OS 7.6, which dropped the "System" moniker. Eventually many features developed for Copland, including support for "themes" (the default Platinum was the only theme included) were rolled into Mac OS 7.7, which was rebranded as "Mac OS 8". With the return of Steve Jobs, this rebranding also allowed Apple to exploit a legal loophole to terminate third-party manufacturers' licenses to System 7 and effectively shut down the Macintosh clone market. Later, Mac OS 8.6 updated the nanokernel to handle preemptive tasks. Its interface was Multiprocessing Services 2.x and later, but there was still no process separation and the system still used cooperative multitasking between processes. Even a process that was Multiprocessing Services-aware still had a portion that ran in the blue task, a task that also ran all single-threaded programs (and the only task that could run 68k code).
At the same time, Apple pursued Hancock's alternative plan, and Apple started looking to buy a third-party operating system product. After lengthy discussions with Be and rumors of a merger with Sun Microsystems, many were surprised when Apple bought NeXT in December 1996. The project to port OpenStep to the Macintosh platform was named Rhapsody and was eventually released as Mac OS X, which, prior to the Intel release of Mac OS 10.4 (Tiger), also used the 'blue box' concept in the form of Classic to run applications written for older versions of Mac OS.
A number of features originally seen in Copland demos, including its advanced Find command, built-in Internet browser, and support for video-conferencing, have reappeared in recent releases of Mac OS X as Spotlight, Safari, and iChat AV, respectively, although the implementation and user interface for each feature is completely different.
US Patent Issued to Music Broadcasting on May 7 for "Method and System for Preventing Unauthorized Recording of Media Content on a Macintosh Operating System" (California Inventors)
May 07, 2013; ALEXANDRIA, Va., May 7 -- United States Patent no. 8,438,656, issued on May 7, was assigned to Music Public Broadcasting Inc....
Apple multimedia device using simplified Mac OS will debut in Japan. (Bandai Company Ltd. to manufacture Pippin game machine using version of Macintosh operating system)
Dec 19, 1994; In a bold move, Apple Computer Inc. has granted a license for a simplified version of the Macintosh operating system to Japan's...