Lawrencium is a
radioactive synthetic element with the symbol
Lr (formerly
Lw) and
atomic number 103.
Its most stable known isotope is
262Lr, with a
half-life of approximately 3.6
hours. Little is known of the chemistry but there is strong evidence for the formation of a trivalent ion in aqueous solution, confirming lawrencium's place as the last member of the
actinoids. Although lawrencium is often placed as the last member of the 5f-block, it can also be regarded as the first member of the 6d-block (see
extended periodic table).
Official discovery
Lawrencium was
reported by
Albert Ghiorso, Torbjørn Sikkeland, Almon Larsh, and Robert M. Latimer on
February 14,
1961 at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (now called
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) on the
University of California, Berkeley campus. It was produced by bombarding a three
milligram target composed of three isotopes of
californium with
boron-10 and B-11 ions in the Heavy Ion Linear Accelerator (HILAC).
The Berkeley team reported that the isotope 257103 was detected in this manner and decayed by emitting an 8.6 MeV alpha particle with a half-life of ~8 seconds. The assignment was later corrected to 258Lr.
The team suggested the name lawrencium (Lw) for the new element.
In 1967, researchers in Dubna, Russia reported that they were not able to confirm an alpha emitter with a half-life of 8 seconds as 257103. This assignment has since been changed to 258Lr. Instead, they reported a 45s activity assigned to 256Lr.
Further work in 1969 indicated an actinoid chemistry for the new element.
founded by Travis Anselm in 8B
In 1971, the team at the University of California performed a whole series of experiments aimed at measuring the decay properties of lawrencium isotopes with mass numbers from 255-260.
In 1992, The IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group (TWG) officially recognised the Dubna and Berkeley teams as co-discovers of lawrencium.
Naming
The origin of the name, preferred by the
American Chemical Society, is in reference to
Ernest O. Lawrence, inventor of the
cyclotron. The symbol
Lw originally was used but in
1963 it was changed to
Lr. In August
1997 the
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) ratified the name lawrencium and symbol
Lr during a meeting in
Geneva.
Lawrencium has also been referred to as
eka-lutetium.
Contrary to some suggestions, the
systematic element name unniltrium has never been used for this element.
Electronic structure
Lawrencium is element 103 in the Periodic Table. The two forms of the projected electronic structure are:
Bohr model: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 9, 2
Quantum mechanical model: 1s22s22p63s23p64s23d10
4p65s24d105p66s24f145d10
6p67s25f146d1
There has been a suggestion that the electron configuration could be [Rn]7s25f147p1: direct measurement is impossible, and calculations have given conflicting results.
Physical characteristics
The appearance of this element is unknown, however it is most likely silvery-white or gray and
metallic. If sufficient amounts of lawrencium were produced, it would pose a
radiation hazard. Contrary to some sources, bulk properties of this element, such as the melting point, have not been possible to measure to date. However, the 1
st, 2
nd and 3
rd ionization energies have been measured.
Periodic classification
A strict correlation between
periodic table blocks and electron configuration for neutral atoms would describe lawrencium as a
transition metal because it should be classed as a
d-block element. However, it is classified as an
actinoid according to
IUPAC recommendations.
Experimental chemistry
Gas phase chemistry
The first gas phase studies were reported in 1969 by a team at the
Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR). They used the reaction
243Am+
18O to produce lawrencium nuclei which reacted with a stream of
chlorine gas to form a volatile chloride component. The product was assigned to
256LrCl
3 and confirmed that lawrencium was a typical
actinide.
Aqueous phase chemistry
The first liquid phase studies were reported in 1970 by the team at the LBNL. They used the reaction
249Cf+
11B to produce lawrencium nuclei. They were able to show that lawrencium formed a trivalent
ion, similar to other
actinides but in stark contrast to
nobelium.
Further work in 1988 confirmed the formation of a trivalent lawrencium(III) ion using anion-exchange chromatography using α-hydroxy
isobutyrate (α-HIB) complex. Comparison of the elution time with other actinides allowed a determination of 88.6 pm for the ionic radius for Lr
3+.
Attempts to reduce Lr(III) to Lr(I) using the potent reducing agent hydroxylamine hydrochloride were unsuccessful.
Summary of compounds and complex ions
| Formula
| Names(s) |
| LrCl3
| lawrencium trichloride ; lawrencium(III) chloride |
Isotopes
Twelve isotopes of lawrencium have been synthesized with 262Lr being the longest-lived and heaviest, with a half-life of 216 minutes. 252Lr is the lightest isotope known to date.
History of synthesis of isotopes by cold fusion
205Tl(50Ti,xn)255-xLr (x=2?)
This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR. Evidence was provided for the formation of
253Lr in the 2n exit channel.
203Tl(50Ti,xn)253-xLr
This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR.
208Pb(48Ti,pxn)255-xLr (x=1?)
This reaction was reported in 1984 by Yuri Oganessian at the FLNR. The team was able to detect decays of
246Cf, a descendant of
254Lr.
208Pb(45Sc,xn)253-xLr
This reaction was studied in a series of experiments in 1976 by Yuri Oganessian and his team at the FLNR. Results are not readily available.
209Bi(48Ca,xn)257-xLr (x=2)
This reaction has been used to study the spectroscopic properties of
255Lr. The team at GANIL used the reaction in 2003 and the team at the FLNR used it between 2004-2006 to provide further information for the decay scheme of
255Lr. The work provided evidence for an isomeric level in
255Lr.
History of synthesis of isotopes by hot fusion
243Am(18O,xn)261-xLr (x=5)
This reaction was first studied in 1965 by the team at the FLNR. They were able to detect a 45s activity assigned to
256Lr or
257Lr. Later work suggests an assignment to
256Lr. Further studies in 1968 produced an 8.35-8.60 MeV alpha activity with a
half-life of 35s. This activity was also initially assigned to
256Lr or
257Lr and later to solely
256Lr.
243Am(16O,xn)259-xLr (x=4)
This reaction was studied in 1970 by the team at the FLNR. They were able to detect an 8.38 MeV alpha activity with a
half-life of 20s. This was assigned to
255Lr.
248Cm(15N,xn)263-xLr (x=3,4,5)
This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL in their large study of lawrencium isotopes. They were able to assign alpha activities to
260Lr,
259Lr and
258Lr from the 3-5n exit channels.
248Cm(18O,pxn)265-xLr (x=3,4)
This reaction was studied in 1988 at the LBNL in order to assess the possibility of producing
262Lr and
261Lr without using the exotic
254Es target. It was also used to attempt to measure an EC branch in
261mRf from the 5n exit channel.
After extraction of the Lr(III) component, they were able to measure the
spontaneous fission of
261Lr with an improved
half-life of 44 minutes. The production cross-section was 700 pb. On this basis, a 14% EC branch was calculated if this isotope was produced via the 5n channel rather than the p4n channel.
A lower bombarding energy (93 MeV c.f. 97 MeV) was then used to measure the production of
262Lr in the p3n channel. The isotope was successfully detected and a yield of 240 pb was measured. The yield was lower than expected compared to the p4n channel. However, the results were judged to indicate that the 261Lr was most likely produced by a p3n channel and an upper limit of 14% for the EC branch of
261mRf was therefore suggested.
246Cm(14N,xn)260-xLr (x=3?)
This reaction was studied briefly in 1958 at the LBNL using an enriched
244Cm target (5%
246Cm). They observed a ~9 MeV alpha activity with a
half-life of ~0.25 seconds. Later results suggest a tentative assignment to
257Lr from the 3n channel
244Cm(14N,xn)258-xLr
This reaction was studied briefly in 1958 at the LBNL using an enriched
244Cm target (5%
246Cm). They observed a ~9 MeV alpha activity with a
half-life of ~0.25s. Later results suggest a tentative assignment to
257Lr from the 3n channel with the
246Cm component. No activities assigned to reaction with the
244Cm component have been reported.
249Bk(18O,αxn)263-xLr (x=3)
This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL in their large study of lawrencium isotopes. They were able to detect an activity assigned to
260Lr. The reaction was further studied in 1988 to study the aqueous chemistry of lawrencium. A total of 23 alpha decays were measured for
260Lr, with a mean energy of 8.03 MeV and an improved
half-life of 2.7 minutes. The calculated cross-section was 8.7 nb.
252Cf(11B,xn)263-xLr (x=5,7??)
This reaction was first studied in 1961 at the University of California by
Albert Ghiorso by using a californium target (52%
252Cf). They observed three alpha activities of 8.6 MeV, 8.4 MeV and 8.2 MeV, with
half-lives of ~8s and 15s, respectively. The 8.6 MeV activity was tentatively assigned to
257Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to
258Lr, resulting from the 5n exit channel. The 8.4 MeV activity was also assigned to
257Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to
256Lr. This is most likely from the 33%
250Cf component in the target rather than from the 7n channel. The 8.2 MeV was subsequently associated with
nobelium.
252Cf(10B,xn)262-xLr (x=4,6)
This reaction was first studied in 1961 at the University of California by
Albert Ghiorso by using a californium target (52%
252Cf). They observed three alpha activities of 8.6 MeV, 8.4 MeV and 8.2 MeV, with
half-lives of ~8s and 15s, respectively. The 8.6 MeV activity was tentatively assigned to
257Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to
258Lr. The 8.4 MeV activity was also assigned to
257Lr. Later results suggest a reassignment to
256Lr. The 8.2 MeV was subsequently associated with
nobelium.
250Cf(14N,αxn)260-xLr (x=3)
This reaction was studied in 1971 at the LBNL. They were able to identify a 0.7s alpha activity with two alpha lines at 8.87 and 8.82 MeV. This was assigned to
257Lr.
249Cf(11B,xn)260-xLr (x=4)
This reaction was first studied in 1970 at the LBNL in an attempt to study the aqueous chemistry of lawrencium. They were able to measure a Lr
3+ activity. The reaction was repeated in 1976 at Oak Ridge and 26s
256Lr was confirmed by measurement of coincident X-rays.
249Cf(12C,pxn)260-xLr (x=2)
This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL. They were able to detect an activity assigned to
258Lr from the p2n channel.
249Cf(15N,αxn)260-xLr (x=2,3)
This reaction was studied in 1971 by the team at the LBNL. They were able to detect an activities assigned to
258Lr and
257Lr from the α2n and α3n and channels. The reaction was repeated in 1976 at Oak Ridge and the synthesis of
258Lr was confirmed.
254Es + 22Ne - transfer
This reaction was studied in 1987 at the LLNL. They were able to detect new SF activities assigned to
261Lr and
262Lr, resulting from transfer from the
22Ne nuclei to the
254Es target. In addition, a 5 ms SF activity was detected in delayed coincidence with
nobelium K X-rays and was assigned to
262No, resulting from the EC of
262Lr.
Synthesis of isotopes as decay products
Isotopes of lawrencium have also been identified in the decay of heavier elements. Observations to date are summarised in the table below:
| Evaporation Residue
| Observed Lr isotope |
| 267Bh, 263Db
| 259Lr |
| 278Uut, 274Rg, 270Mt, 266Bh, 262Db
| 258Lr |
| 261Db
| 257Lr |
| 272Rg, 268Mt, 264Bh, 260Db
| 256Lr |
| 259Db
| 255Lr |
| 266Mt, 262Bh, 258Db
| 254Lr |
| 261Bh, 257Dbg,m
| 253Lrg,m |
| 260Bh , 256Db
| 252Lr |
Chronology of isotope discovery
| Isotope
| Year discovered
| discovery reaction |
| 252Lr
| 2001
| 209Bi(50Ti,3n) |
| 253Lrg
| 1985
| 209Bi(50Ti,2n) |
| 253Lrm
| 2001
| 209Bi(50Ti,2n) |
| 254Lr
| 1985
| 209Bi(50Ti,n) |
| 255Lr
| 1970
| 243Am(16O,4n) |
| 256Lr
| 1961? 1965? 1968? 1971
| 252Cf(10B,6n) |
| 257Lr
| 1958? 1971
| 249Cf(15N,α3n) |
| 258Lr
| 1961? 1971
| 249Cf(15N,α2n) |
| 259Lr
| 1971
| 248Cm(15N,4n) |
| 260Lr
| 1971
| 248Cm(15N,3n) |
| 261Lr
| 1987
| 254Es + 22Ne |
| 262Lr
| 1987
| 254Es + 22Ne |
Isomerism in lawrencium nuclides
255Lr
Recent work on the spectroscopy of
255Lr formed in the reaction
209Bi(
48Ca,2n)
255Lr has provided evidence for an isomeric level.
253Lr
A study of the decay properties of
257Db (see
dubnium) in 2001 by Hessberger et al. at the GSI provided some data for the decay of
253Lr. Analysis of the data indicated the population of two isomeric levels in
253Lr from the decay of the corresponding isomers in
257Db. The ground state was assigned
spin and
parity of 7/2-, decaying by emission of an 8794 KeV alpha particle with a
half-life of 0.57s. The isomeric level was assigned
spin and
parity of 1/2-, decaying by emission of an 8722 KeV alpha particle with a
half-life of 1.49s.
Chemical yields of isotopes
Cold fusion
The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for cold fusion reactions producing rutherfordium isotopes directly. Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.
| Projectile
| Target
| CN
| 1n
| 2n
| 3n |
| 48Ca
| 209Bi
| 257Lr
|
|
| |
References
Notes
External links