In his 1925 paper “Проблема полета при помощи реактивных аппаратов: межпланетные полеты” [Problems of flight by jet propulsion: interplanetary flights], Friedrich Zander made a similar argument.
However, neither investigator realized that gravitational assists from planets along a spacecraft’s trajectory could propel a spacecraft and that therefore such assists could greatly reduce the amount of fuel required to travel among the planets. That discovery was made by Michael Minovitch in 1961.
The gravity assist was first used in 1959 when the Soviet probe Luna 3 photographed the far side of earth's moon. The maneuver relied on research performed at the Department of Applied Mathematics of Steklov Institute.
A slingshot maneuver around a planet changes a spacecraft's velocity relative to the Sun, even though it preserves the spacecraft's speed relative to the planet—as it must according to the law of conservation of energy. To a first approximation, from a large distance, the spacecraft appears to have bounced off the planet. Physicists call this an elastic collision even though no contact actually occurs.
A spacecraft traveling to an inner planet will accelerate because it is falling toward the Sun, and a spacecraft traveling to an outer planet will decelerate because it is leaving the vicinity of the Sun.
Although it is true that the orbital speed of an inner planet is greater than that of the Earth, a spacecraft traveling to an inner planet is accelerated by the Sun's gravity to a speed notably greater than the orbital speed of that destination planet. If the spacecraft's purpose is only to fly by the inner planet, then there is typically no need to slow the spacecraft. However, if the spacecraft is to be inserted into orbit about that inner planet, then there must be a mechanism to slow the spacecraft.
Likewise, although it is true that the orbital speed of an outer planet is less than that of the Earth, a spacecraft traveling to an outer planet is decelerated by the Sun's gravity to a speed far less than the orbital speed of that outer planet. Thus there must be a mechanism to accelerate the spacecraft. Also, accelerating the spacecraft will, of course, reduce the travel time.
Rocket engines can certainly be used to accelerate and decelerate the spacecraft. However, rocket thrust takes fuel, fuel has mass, and even a small amount of additional mass requirement in the interplanetary vehicle translates to considerably larger engines for raising the spacecraft from the Earth. This is because not only must the primary engines lift that additional mass out of the Earth's gravity well, they must now lift the additional mass of the extra fuel used to lift that additional mass. Thus the liftoff mass requirement increases (roughly) exponentially with an increase in the mass requirement of the payload.
With gravity assist, a spacecraft can be accelerated or decelerated without the need for additional fuel. Also, aerobraking can be used for deceleration, when convenient. The combination of gravity assist and aerobraking, where possible, can save considerable fuel.
As an example, the MESSENGER mission uses gravity assist to slow the spacecraft on its way to Mercury, but aerobraking cannot be used for insertion into orbit about Mercury because Mercury has almost no atmosphere.
Journeys to the nearest planets, Mars and Venus, use a Hohmann transfer orbit, an elliptical path which starts as a tangent to one planet's orbit round the sun and finishes as a tangent to the other. This method uses very nearly the smallest possible amount of fuel, but is very slow — it can take over a year to travel from Earth to Mars (fuzzy orbits use even less fuel, but are even slower).
Similarly it might take decades for a spaceship to travel to the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, etc.) using a Hohmann transfer orbit, and it would still require far too much fuel, because the spaceship would have to travel for 500 million miles (800 million km) or more against the force of the sun's gravity. Gravitational slingshots offer a way to gain speed without using any fuel, and all missions to the outer planets have used it.
Another limit is caused by the atmosphere of the available planet. The closer the craft can get, the more boost it gets, because gravity falls with the square of distance. If a craft gets too far into the atmosphere, however, the energy lost to friction can exceed that gained from the planet. On the other hand, this effect can be useful if the goal is to lose energy. See aerobraking.
Interplanetary slingshots using the sun itself are impossible because the Sun is at rest relative to the solar system as a whole. However, thrusting when near the Sun has the same effect as the powered slingshot described below. This has the potential to magnify a spacecraft's thrusting power enormously, but is limited by the spacecraft's ability to resist the heat.
An interstellar slingshot using the Sun is conceivable, involving for example an object coming from elsewhere in our galaxy and slingshotting around the Sun to boost its galactic travel. The energy and angular momentum would then come from the Sun's orbit around the Milky Way. The time scales involved for such an operation are considerably beyond current human capabilities, however.
Another theoretical limit is based on general relativity. If a spacecraft gets close to the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole (the ultimate gravity well), space becomes so curved that slingshot orbits require more energy to escape than the energy that could be added by the black hole's motion.
A rotating black hole might provide additional assistance, if its spin axis points the right way. General relativity predicts that a large spinning mass produces frame-dragging — close to the object, space itself is dragged around in the direction of the spin. In theory an ordinary star produces this effect, although attempts to measure it around the sun have produced no clear results. General relativity predicts that a spinning black hole is surrounded by a region of space, called the ergosphere, within which standing still (with respect to the black hole's spin) is impossible, because space itself is dragged at the speed of light in the same direction as the black hole's spin. The Penrose process may offer a way to gain energy from the ergosphere, although it would require the spaceship to dump some "ballast" into the black hole, and the spaceship would have had to expend energy to carry the "ballast" to the black hole.
The Galileo engineering inquest speculated (but was never able to conclusively prove) that this longer flight time coupled with the heat near Venus, is what caused lubricant in Galileo's main antenna to fail. This mechanical failure forced the use of a much less powerful backup antenna.
Its subsequent tour of the Jovian moons also used numerous slingshot maneuvers with those moons to conserve fuel and maximize the number of encounters.
The craft was sent towards Jupiter, aimed to arrive at a point in space just "in front of" and "below" the planet. As it passed Jupiter, the probe 'fell' through the planet's gravity field, borrowing a minute amount of momentum from the planet; after it had passed Jupiter, the velocity change had bent the probe's trajectory up out of the plane of the planetary orbits, placing it in an orbit that passed over the poles of the Sun. This maneuver required only enough fuel to send Ulysses to a point near Jupiter, which is well within current technologies.
Suppose that you are a "stationary" observer and that you see: a planet moving left at speed U; a spaceship moving right at speed v. If the spaceship is on the right path, it will pass close to the planet, moving at speed U + v relative to the planet's surface because the planet is moving in the opposite direction at speed U. When the spaceship leaves orbit, it is still moving at U + v relative to the planet's surface but in the opposite direction, to the left; and since the planet is moving left at speed U, the spaceship is moving left at speed 2U + v from your point of view – its speed has increased by 2U, twice the speed at which the planet is moving.
It might seem that this is oversimplified since we have not covered the details of the orbit, but it turns out that if the spaceship travels in a path which forms a hyperbola, it can leave the planet in the opposite direction without firing its engine, the speed gain at large distance is indeed 2U once it has left the gravity of the planet far behind.
This explanation might seem to violate the conservation of energy and momentum, but we have neglected the spacecraft's effects on the planet. The linear momentum gained by the spaceship is equal in magnitude to that lost by the planet, though the planet's large mass makes the resulting change in speed negligibly small. These effects on the planet are so slight (because planets are so much more massive than spacecraft) that they can be ignored in the calculation.
Realistic portrayals of encounters in space require the consideration of two dimensions. In that case the same principles apply, only adding the planet's velocity requires vector addition, as shown below.
If even more speed is needed, the most economical way is to fire a rocket engine near the periapsis (closest approach). A given rocket burn always provides the same change in velocity (delta-v), but the change in kinetic energy is proportional to the vehicle's velocity at the time of the burn. So to get the most kinetic energy from the burn, the burn must occur at the vehicle's maximum velocity, at periapsis. Powered slingshots describes this technique in more detail.
Rocket engines produce the same force regardless of their velocity. A rocket acting on a fixed object, as in a static firing, does no useful work at all; the rocket's stored energy is entirely expended on its propellant. But when the rocket and payload move, the force applied to the payload by the rocket during any time interval acts through the distance the rocket and payload move during that time. Force acting through a distance is the definition of mechanical energy or work. So the farther the rocket and payload move during any given interval, i.e., the faster they move, the greater the kinetic energy imparted to the payload by the rocket. (This is why rockets are seldom used on slow-moving vehicles; they're simply too inefficient.)
Energy is still conserved, however. The additional energy imparted to the payload is exactly matched by a decrease in energy imparted to the propellant being expelled behind the rocket because the speed of the rocket subtracts from the propellant exhaust velocity. But we don't care about the propellant, so the faster we can move during a rocket burn, the better.
So if we want to impart the maximum amount of kinetic energy to a spacecraft whose velocity varies with time, we should do it when it's moving the fastest. During a gravity assist, this happens at periapsis, the closest approach to the planet, so that's when we do the burn.
Another way to look at it is that by bringing in propellant as we fell into the planet's gravity well and leaving it there before we climb back out, we are able to extract much of the potential energy that was contained in that propellant.
Kranz, Gene. Failure is not an option; mission control from Mercury to Apollo 13 and beyond.(Book Review)(Young Adult Review)(Brief Article)
Jan 01, 2002; Berkley. 415p. illus. index. c2000. 0-425-17987-7. $14.00. SA Eugene F. Kranz was just another frustrated and air-struck boy in...