In the United States, the federal government levied inheritance taxes during the Civil War period and again during the Spanish-American War; since 1916, however, a progressive estate tax has been imposed. The U.S. tax law of 1981 greatly reduced estate and gift taxes by raising exemptions (from $175,000 to $600,000) and lowering rates, and a 2001 law calls phase out the federal estate tax by 2012; estate taxes in 40 states that are based on the federal tax credit for state estate taxes would be phased out in 2006.
Levy on the property accruing to each beneficiary of the estate of a deceased person. Inheritance tax may be more difficult to administer than estate tax because the value passing to each beneficiary must be fixed, and this often requires complex actuarial calculations. Inheritance taxes date back to the Roman Empire. In the U.S. inheritance taxes have always been collected by the individual states, while the federal government has imposed an estate tax. The first state inheritance tax was imposed by Pennsylvania in 1826.
Learn more about inheritance tax with a free trial on Britannica.com.
Currently, 94% of all estates escape Inheritance Tax, mainly because they fall in the nil rate band.
For the 2008/2009 tax year, the IHT rate is 0% on the first £312,000 (the "nil-rate band), and 40% on the rest of the value, at death, of an individual's tax estate. The nil rate band rises annually; tax is only payable on the value of an estate above the nil rate band. For example, all other things being equal, an individual whose estate is £354,000 (the mean London house price in 2007) will pay IHT amounting to 0% of £312,000 plus 40% of £42,000 i.e £16,800 in all. This is 40% of the amount over the nil rate band, but in this example, 4.7% of the total value of the estate. Those whose estates match the average nation-wide house price of £210,000 will pay zero IHT.
In the 2007 budget report the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced that the nil rate band is to rise to £350,000 by 2010. This is said to take into account the sharp rise in house prices in the United Kingdom over the past few years., although in fact it represents an increase below the rate of house price inflation.
There is also a charge on "lifetime chargeable transfers" into certain trusts (and a recalculation of those charges if the giver dies within seven years), and trusts themselves have an inheritance tax regime. See Taxation of trusts (United Kingdom).
For example, if in 2007/08 the first married spouse (or civil partner) to die were to leave £120,000 to their children and the rest of their estate to their spouse there would be no inheritance tax due at that time, and £180,000 or 60% of the nil rate band would be unused. Later, upon the second death the nil-rate band would be 160% of the allowance for a single person, so that if the surviving spouse also died in 2007/08 the first £480,000 (160% of £300,000) of the surviving spouse's estate would be exempt from inheritance tax. If the surviving spouse died in a later year when the nil rate band had reached £350,000, the first £560,000 (160% of £350,000) of the estate would be tax exempt.
This measure was also extended to existing widows, widowers and bereaved civil partners at 9 October 2007. So if their late spouse or partner had not used all of their inheritance tax allowance at the time of their death, then the unused percentage of that allowance can now be added to the single person's allowance when the surviving spouse or partner dies. This applies however long ago the first spouse died, but there are special rules if the surviving spouse remarried.
In a judgement following an unsuccessful appeal to a 2006 decision by the European Court of Human Rights, it was held that the above does not apply to siblings living together. The crucial factor in such cases was determined to be the existence of a public undertaking, carrying with it a body of rights and obligations of a contractual nature, rather than the length or supportive nature of the relationship.
Prior to this legislative change, the most common means of ensuring that both nil rate bands were used was called a nil band discretionary trust (now more properly known as NRB Relevant Property Trust*). This is an arrangement in both wills which says that whoever is the first to die leaves their nil band to a discretionary trust for the family, and not to the survivor. The survivor can still benefit from those assets if needed, but they are not part of that survivor's estate.
On 16 October 2006, Philip Johnston, writing in The Daily Telegraph had a scathing leading article against inheritance taxes and called for David Cameron, new leader of the Conservative Party (UK), to announce the demise of a catch-all inheritance tax as a main plank in that party's next manifesto. .
Despite the, perhaps understandable, criticisms of taxes that occur when someone dies, it is accepted by many that it makes sense to tax people that can no longer use their money. In addition, it can have redistributive qualities, taking money away from those that can afford it and redistribute it. For example, The Economist published an article in October 2007 which highlights this, but also acknowledges the political controversy it can cause, and suggests some ways to reform it.