A daytime running lamp
, also daylight running lamp
or daytime running light
) is a lighting device
on the front of a roadgoing motor vehicle
, installed in pairs, automatically switched on when the vehicle is moving forward, and intended to increase the conspicuity of the vehicle during daylight
conditions. DRLs might have been first seriously proposed in 1961 in the USA, in response to Texas then-Governor Price Daniels' drive-safely campaign..
It is considered problematic and difficult to apply the successful results obtained in Scandinavian countries to jurisdictions like the U.S., Canada and Australia
, as the ambient light conditions and vehicles in use are different. Nevertheless, studies in North America have tended to suggest various degrees of potential safety benefit from DRLs. There remains concern over possible safety detriments to certain DRL implementations
, such as turn signal masking by adjacent high-intensity DRLs, and a potential reduction in motorcycle safety since motorcycles are no longer the only vehicles displaying headlamps during the day. However, the concept
of the daytime running light has repeatedly been scientifically shown to have safety value.
DRLs were first mandated in Scandinavian
countries, where ambient light levels in the winter are generally low even during the day. Sweden
was the first country to require widespread DRLs in 1977. At the time, the function was known as varselljus
("perception light" or "notice light"). The initial regulations in these countries favored devices incorporating 21-watt
signal bulbs identical to those used in brake lamps and turn signals, producing yellow
or white light of approximately 400 to 600 candela
, mounted at the outer left and right edges of the front of the vehicle. Finland
adopted a daytime-light requirement in 1972 on rural roads in wintertime, and in 1982 on rural roads in summertime and 1997 on all roads all year long; Norway
in 1986, Iceland
in 1988, and Denmark
in 1990. To increase manufacturer flexibility in complying with the requirement for DRLs, the daytime illumination of low-beam headlights
was added as an optional implementation. Given the ECE
headlamp specifications in use in those countries, such an implementation would produce approximately 450 cd axially.
UK national regulations
required vehicles first used on or after 1 April 1987
to be equipped with a dim-dip
device or daytime running lamps, except such vehicles as comply fully with ECE Regulation 48
regarding installation of lighting equipment. A dim-dip device operates the low beam headlamps (called "dipped beam" in the UK) at between 10 percent and 20 percent of normal low-beam intensity when the position lamps
are switched on, the primary aim being to prevent drivers using only position lamps at night. UK specifications for functionally-dedicated DRLs called for at least 200 candela straight ahead, and no more than 800 candela in any direction. These regulatory provisions were based on ILPE research and recommendations
In practice, most vehicles were equipped with the dim-dip option, rather than DRLs, and the Dim-Dip requirement was quashed by the European Commission. See Automotive lighting
for more information.
Germany, France and others have encouraged or required daytime use of low-beam headlamps on certain roads at certain times of year, Ireland encourages and Bulgaria
requires the use of low-beam headlights at all times during winter, Italy
require daytime running lamps outside populated areas, and Estonia
requires the use of full or reduced voltage low-beam headlights at all times. Most EU states no longer significantly disagree over whether DRLs should be required, permitted, or prohibited; by member-state consensus, from 2011, ECE R48
will require DRLs conforming to ECE R87 (or full-time low-beam headlamps) on all new motor vehicles. DRLs compliant with R87 emit white light of between 400 and 1200 candela.
Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 108
requires DRLs on all new vehicles made or imported after January 1 1990
proposed DRL regulation was essentially similar to regulations in place in Scandinavia
, with an axial luminous intensity
limit of 1,500 candela
, but automakers objected, claiming it was too expensive to add a new front lighting device, and would increase warranty costs (by dint of increased bulb replacements) to run the low beams. After a pitched regulatory battle, the standard was rewritten to permit the use of reduced-voltage high beam headlamps
producing up to 7,000 axial candela
, as well as permitting any light color from white to amber
or selective yellow
. These changes to the regulation permitted automakers to implement a less-costly DRL, such as by connecting the high beam filaments in series
to supply each filament with half its rated voltage
, or by burning the front turn signals
full time (except when actually flashing as turn indicators).
, interested in reducing the build variations of cars for the North American market, began lobbying the DOT (United States Department of Transportation
) to permit DRLs in the United States
shortly after Canada required them. A prolonged regulatory battle was fought, with the DOT objecting on grounds of potential safety drawbacks and glare issues. Eventually, however, these objections were set aside and DRLs of the same types allowed in Canada (save for fog lamp DRLs) were legalized but not mandated effective with the 1995 model year. General Motors immediately equipped most (and, in following years, all) of its vehicles with DRLs beginning with the Chevrolet Corsica
. Saab, Volkswagen, Volvo, Suzuki and Subaru gradually introduced DRLs in the U.S. market beginning in 1995. In recent years, Lexus
has installed high-beam or turn signal based DRLs on US models. Some Toyota
models come with DRLs as standard or optional equipment, and with a driver-controllable on/off switch. Starting in the 2006 model year, Honda
equipped both the Accord and new Civic with DRLs, and beginning in the 2008 model year the Pilot, S2000, and Odyssey will be so equipped.
Public reaction to DRLs, generally neutral to positive in Canada, is decidedly mixed in the U.S. (where motorcycles have since 1976 been wired so that low beam headlamp is on whenever the engine is running—not as a matter of law, but by voluntary industry action). Thousands of complaints regarding glare from DRLs were lodged with the DOT shortly after DRLs were permitted on cars, and there was also concern that headlamp-based DRLs reduce the conspicuity of motorcycles, and that DRLs based on front turn signals introduce ambiguity into the turn signal system. In 1997, in response to these complaints and after measuring actual DRL intensity well above the 7,000 cd limit on vehicles in use, DOT proposed changes to the DRL specification that would have capped axial intensity at 1,500 candela, a level nearly identical to the European 1,200 cd and identical to the initially-proposed Canadian limit. During the open comment period, thousands of public comments were received by DOT in support of lowering the intensity (or advocating the complete elimination of DRLs from U.S. roads). Automaker sentiment generally ran along predictable lines, with European automakers experienced at complying with European DRL requirements voicing no objection to the proposal, and North American automakers vociferously repeating the same objections they raised in response to Canada's initial proposal. The DOT proposal for DRL intensity reduction was rescinded in 2004.
Motorcyclists have objected that DRLs on autos will reduce the conspicuity of motorcycles, and the debate has been complicated by studies showing no safety benefit to DRLs on motorcycles
DRL power consumption varies widely depending on the implementation. Current production DRL systems consume from 8 watts
system) to over 200 W (headlamps and all parking, tail, and marker lights on). International regulators, primarily in Europe, are struggling to balance the potential safety benefit offered by DRL with the increased fuel consumption due to their use. Because the power to run the DRLs must be produced by the engine, which in turn requires burning additional fuel, high-power DRL systems increase CO2
emissions sufficiently to affect a country's compliance with the Kyoto protocol
on greenhouse gas
emissions. For that reason, low-power solutions are being encouraged for use when and if DRLs become mandatory in ECE Regulations
. LEDs and low-power, high-efficacy, long-life light bulbs produce appropriate amounts of light for an effective DRL without significantly increasing fuel consumption or emissions. Fuel consumption reductions of up to 0.5 mpg may be found when comparing a 55 W DRL system to a 200 W DRL system. In 2006, the UK's Department of Transport also found significant reductions in emissions and fuel consumption when comparing a 42 W DRL system to a 160 W full headlight DRL systems. DRL fuel consumption can be reduced to insignificant levels by the use of 8- to 20 W DRL systems based on LEDs or high-efficacy filament bulbs.