Related Searches
Definitions

Emil Brunner

Emil Brunner

[broon-er]
Brunner, Emil, 1889-1966, Swiss Protestant theologian. A clear and systematic thinker from the school of dialectical theology, he was a professor of theology at the Univ. of Zürich (1924-53) and Christian Univ., Tokyo (1953-55). He several times visited and lectured in the United States. Like Karl Barth he challenged the leaders of modern rational and liberal Christian theology and proclaimed a theology of revelation. The Christian faith, he maintained, arises from the encounter between individuals and God as He is revealed in the Bible. Brunner, in attempting later to leave a place for natural theology in his system, came into conflict with Barth over the question of natural revelation. Brunner refused to accept the radical divorce between grace and human consciousness that Barth proposed. His more important works include Die Mystik und das Wort (1924), Der Mittler (1927, tr. The Mediator, 1934), Das Gebot und die Ordnungen (1932, tr. The Divine Imperative, 1937), Der Mensch in Widerspruch (1937, tr. Man in Revolt, 1939), Wahrheit als Begegung (1938, tr. The Divine-Human Encounter, 1943), and Christianity and Civilization (2 vol., 1948-49).

See study by J. Edward Humphrey (1984).

(born Dec. 23, 1889, Winterthur, Switz.—died April 6, 1966, Zürich) Swiss Reformed theologian. After serving as a pastor at Obstalden (1916–24), he taught for many years at the University of Zürich (1924–53); he lectured widely during this time and was a delegate to the founding session of the World Council of Churches in 1948. His theology was influenced by Martin Buber's view of the relationship between God and man. Like Karl Barth, he rejected 19th-century liberal theology in favour of reaffirming the central tenets of the Reformation, but his assertion that God was revealed in creation led to a dispute with Barth. His works include The Theology of Crisis (1929), Man in Revolt (1937), and Justice and the Social Order (1945).

Learn more about Brunner, (Heinrich) Emil with a free trial on Britannica.com.

Emil Brunner (December 23, 1889April 6, 1966) was an eminent and highly influential Swiss theologian. Along with Karl Barth (see Relationship with Karl Barth), he is commonly associated with the neo-orthodoxy or dialectical theology movement.

Biography

Emil Brunner was born near Zurich.

He studied at both the universities of Zurich and Berlin, receiving his doctorate in theology from Zurich in 1913. The title of his doctoral dissertation was: The Symbolic Element in Religious Knowledge. Brunner served as pastor from 1916 to 1917 in the mountain village of Obstalden in the Canton of Glarus. He spent a year in New York, USA at Union Theological Seminary studying (1919–1920).

In 1921 Brunner wrote what he considered a second dissertation: Experience, Knowledge and Faith. Soon, another book followed: Mysticism and the Word. This work was a devastating critique of the liberal theology of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Brunner was rewarded for his literary efforts with the appointment as the professor of Systematic and Practical Theology at the University of Zurich from 1924–1955. In the next few years his reputation continued to increase particularly with the publication of two more books, the first The Philosophy of Religion from the Standpoint of Protestant Theology, and second The Mediator.

In 1932, following a few years of receiving invitations to visit and lecture across Europe and the United States, and accepting them, Brunner wrote God and Man and The Divine Imperative. Brunner continued his theological output with Man in Revolt and Truth as Encounter in 1937. In 1938–1939 he again visited the US when he agreed to a visiting professorship at Princeton Theological Seminary.

He returned to Europe prior to World War II along with a young Scottish theologian (a student of Karl Barth's in Basel) T. F. Torrance who was teaching at Auburn Theological Seminary. Torrance would later distinguish himself at the University of Edinburgh. Following the war, Brunner was invited to give the distinguished Gifford Lectures at the University of St. Andrews, (1946–1947) in Scotland, the title of his lectures being Christianity and Civilization. His teaching career concluded in 1953–1955 at what was then the new International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan, but not before the publication of his three volume Dogmatics. Volume One was titled: The Christian Doctrine of God. Volume Two was titled: The Christian Doctrine of Creation and Redemption, and the final volume was titled: The Christian Doctrine of the Church, Faith, and Consummation. On the return journey from Japan to Europe, Brunner suffered a cerebral hemorrhage and was physically impaired weakening his ability to work productively. Though there were times when he felt better during the next nine years, he suffered further strokes off and on, finally succumbing to death in 1966.

Brunner undoubtedly holds a place of prominence in Protestant theology in the 20th century and was one of the four or five system builders.

Theology

Brunner rejected liberal theology's (particularly European) portrait of Jesus Christ as merely a highly-respected human being. Instead, Brunner insisted that Jesus was God incarnate and central to salvation. Some observers claim that Brunner also attempted to find a middle position within the ongoing Arminian and Calvinist debate, stating that Christ stood between God's sovereign approach to humankind and free human acceptance of God's gift of salvation. However, as Brunner was a German-speaking European to whose heritage Arminianism did not belong, it may be more accurate to describe his viewpoint as a melding together of Lutheran and Reformed perspectives upon soteriology. In any case, Brunner and his compatriots in the neoorthodox movement all rejected, in toto with other humanist conceptions of Christianity prominent in the late 19th century, Pelagian concepts of human cooperation with God in the act of salvation. They embraced Augustine's views instead, especially as refracted through Martin Luther.

Although Brunner re-emphasized the centrality of Christ, evangelical and fundamentalist theologians have usually rejected Brunner's other teachings, including his dismissal of certain "miraculous" elements within the Scriptures and his questioning of the usefulness of the doctrine of the inspiration of the Bible. This is in accord with the treatment they have afforded others in the movement such as Barth and Paul Tillich; most conservatives have viewed neoorthodox theology as simply a more moderate form of liberalism, rejecting its claims as a legitimate expression of the Protestant tradition.

Relationship with Karl Barth

Brunner and Barth, though friends and colleagues, had a tendentious and rocky relationship differing sometimes dramatically over their theological views. Barth once described their relationship as similar to that of a whale and an elephant. Long before Barth's name was known in the US, Brunner was considered to be the chief proponent of the new theology, at least in America (from the 1930s to early 1950s) where his books were translated much more quickly than Barth's works. Considered by many to be the minor partner in the uneasy relationship, Brunner once acknowledged that the only theological genius of the 20th century was Barth.

Works by

Works about

Search another word or see emil brunneron Dictionary | Thesaurus |Spanish
Copyright © 2014 Dictionary.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
  • Please Login or Sign Up to use the Recent Searches feature
FAVORITES
RECENT

;