In graph theory, breadth-first search (BFS) is a graph search algorithm that begins at the root node and explores all the neighboring nodes. Then for each of those nearest nodes, it explores their unexplored neighbor nodes, and so on, until it finds the goal.
BFS is an uninformed search method that aims to expand and examine all nodes of a graph systematically in search of a solution. In other words, it exhaustively searches the entire graph without considering the goal until it finds it. It does not use a heuristic.
From the standpoint of the algorithm, all child nodes obtained by expanding a node are added to a FIFO queue. In typical implementations, nodes that have not yet been examined for their neighbors are placed in some container (such as a queue or linked list) called "open" and then once examined are placed in the container "closed".
Note: Using a stack instead of a queue to store the nodes yet to be visited would turn this algorithm into a depth-first search.
Then this function performs a breadth-first search on that graph when passed the graph's root node (a Node instance) and any function to be applied to each node in the graph:
For example, this script finds the sum of the integer values of each node in the graph:
Main Algorithm of apply Breadth-first search to graph G=(V,E)：
Since all of the nodes of a level must be saved until their child nodes in the next level have been generated, the space complexity is proportional to the number of nodes at the deepest level. Given a branching factor and graph depth the asymptotic space complexity is the number of nodes at the deepest level, . When the number of vertices and edges in the graph are known ahead of time, the space complexity can also be expressed as where is the cardinality of the set of edges (the number of edges), and is the cardinality of the set of vertices. In the worst case the graph has a depth of 1 and all vertices must be stored. Since it is exponential in the depth of the graph, breadth-first search is often impractical for large problems on systems with bounded space.
Since in the worst case breadth-first search has to consider all paths to all possible nodes the time complexity of breadth-first search is which asymptotically approaches . The time complexity can also be expressed as since every vertex and every edge will be explored in the worst case.
Breadth-first search is complete. This means that if there is a solution breadth-first search will find it regardless of the kind of graph. However, if the graph is infinite and there is no solution breadth-first search will diverge.
For unit-step cost, breadth-first search is optimal. In general breadth-first search is not optimal since it always returns the result with the fewest edges between the start node and the goal node. If the graph is a weighted graph, and therefore has costs associated with each step, a goal next to the start does not have to be the cheapest goal available. This problem is solved by improving breadth-first search to uniform-cost search which considers the path costs. Nevertheless, if the graph is not weighted, and therefore all step costs are equal, breadth-first search will find the nearest and the best solution.
Breadth-first search can be used to solve many problems in graph theory, for example:
The set of nodes reached by a BFS (breadth-first search) are the largest connected component containing the start node.
BFS can be used to test bipartiteness, by starting the search at any vertex and giving alternating labels to the vertices visited during the search. That is, give label 0 to the starting vertex, 1 to all its neighbours, 0 to those neighbours' neighbours, and so on. If at any step a vertex has (visited) neighbours with the same label as itself, then the graph is not bipartite. If the search ends without such a situation occurring, then the graph is bipartite.