name =Binomial
type =mass
pdf_image =

cdf_image =
Colors match the image above
parameters =$n\; geq\; 0$ number of trials (integer)support =$k\; in\; \{0,dots,n\}!$ pdf =$\{nchoose\; k\}\; p^k\; (1p)^\{nk\}\; !$ cdf =$I\_\{1p\}(nlfloor\; krfloor,\; 1+lfloor\; krfloor)\; !$
$0leq\; p\; leq\; 1$ success probability (real)
mean =$np!$
median =one of $\{lfloor\; nprfloor,\; lceil\; np\; rceil\}$
mode =$lfloor\; (n+1),prfloor!$
variance =$np(1p)!$
skewness =$frac\{12p\}\{sqrt\{np(1p)\}\}!$
kurtosis =$frac\{16p(1p)\}\{np(1p)\}!$
entropy =$frac\{1\}\{2\}\; ln\; left(2\; pi\; n\; e\; p\; (1p)\; right)\; +\; O\; left(frac\{1\}\{n\}\; right)$
mgf =$(1p\; +\; pe^t)^n\; !$
char =$(1p\; +\; pe^\{it\})^n\; !$
}}In probability theory and statistics, the binomial distribution is the discrete probability distribution of the number of successes in a sequence of n independent yes/no experiments, each of which yields success with probability p. Such a success/failure experiment is also called a Bernoulli experiment or Bernoulli trial. In fact, when n = 1, the binomial distribution is a Bernoulli distribution. The binomial distribution is the basis for the popular binomial test of statistical significance. A binomial distribution should not be confused with a bimodal distribution.
As another example, assume 5% of a very large population to be greeneyed. You pick 100 people randomly. The number of greeneyed people you pick is a random variable X which follows a binomial distribution with n = 100 and p = 0.05.
In general, if the random variable K follows the binomial distribution with parameters n and p, we write K ~ B(n, p). The probability of getting exactly k successes in n trials is given by the probability mass function:
for k = 0, 1, 2, ..., n and where
is the binomial coefficient (hence the name of the distribution) "n choose k" (also denoted C(n, k) or nCk). The formula can be understood as follows: we want k successes (p^{k}) and n − k failures (1 − p)^{n − k}. However, the k successes can occur anywhere among the n trials, and there are C(n, k) different ways of distributing k successes in a sequence of n trials.
In creating reference tables for binomial distribution probability, usually the table is filled in up to n/2 values. This is because for k > n/2, the probability can be calculated by its complement as
So, one must look to a different k and a different p (the binomial is not symmetrical in general). However, its behavior is not arbitrary. There is always an integer m that satisfies
As a function of k, the expression &fnor;(k; n, p) is monotone increasing for k < m and monotone decreasing for k > m, with the exception of one case where (n + 1)p is an integer. In this case, there are two maximum values for m = (n + 1)p and m − 1. m is known as the most probable (most likely) outcome of Bernoulli trials. Note that the probability of it occurring can be fairly small.
The cumulative distribution function can be expressed as:
where $scriptstyle\; lfloor\; xrfloor,$ is the "floor" under x, i.e. the greatest integer less than or equal to x.
It can also be represented in terms of the regularized incomplete beta function, as follows:
For k ≤ np, upper bounds for the lower tail of the distribution function can be derived. In particular, Hoeffding's inequality yields the bound
and Chernoff's inequality can be used to derive the bound
If X ~ B(n, p) (that is, X is a binomially distributed random variable), then the expected value of X is
and the variance is
This fact is easily proven as follows. Suppose first that we have exactly one Bernoulli trial. We have two possible outcomes, 1 and 0, with the first having probability p and the second having probability 1 − p; the mean for this trial is given by μ = p. Using the definition of variance, we have
Now suppose that we want the variance for n such trials (i.e. for the general binomial distribution). Since the trials are independent, we may add the variances for each trial, giving
The mode of X is the greatest integer less than or equal to (n + 1)p; if m = (n + 1)p is an integer, then m − 1 and m are both modes.
We derive these quantities from first principles. Certain particular sums occur in these two derivations. We rearrange the sums and terms so that sums solely over complete binomial probability mass functions (pmf) arise, which are always unity
We apply the definition of the expected value of a discrete random variable to the binomial distribution
The first term of the series (with index k = 0) has value 0 since the first factor, k, is zero. It may thus be discarded, i.e. we can change the lower limit to: k = 1
We've pulled factors of n and k out of the factorials, and one power of p has been split off. We are preparing to redefine the indices.
We rename m = n − 1 and s = k − 1. The value of the sum is not changed by this, but it now becomes readily recognizable
The ensuing sum is a sum over a complete binomial pmf (of one order lower than the initial sum, as it happens). Thus
It can be shown that the variance is equal to (see: variance, 10. Computational formula for variance):
In using this formula we see that we now also need the expected value of X^{2}, which is
We can use our experience gained above in deriving the mean. We know how to process one factor of k. This gets us as far as
(again, with m = n  1 and s = k  1). We split the sum into two separate sums and we recognize each one
The first sum is identical in form to the one we calculated in the Mean (above). It sums to mp. The second sum is unity.
Using this result in the expression for the variance, along with the Mean (E(X) = np), we get
We have
But
So
Thus
If n is large enough, the skew of the distribution is not too great, and a suitable continuity correction is used, then an excellent approximation to B(n, p) is given by the normal distribution
Various rules of thumb may be used to decide whether n is large enough. One rule is that both np and n(1 − p) must be greater than 5. However, the specific number varies from source to source, and depends on how good an approximation one wants; some sources give 10. Another commonly used rule holds that the above normal approximation is appropriate only if
The following is an example of applying a continuity correction: Suppose one wishes to calculate Pr(X ≤ 8) for a binomial random variable X. If Y has a distribution given by the normal approximation, then Pr(X ≤ 8) is approximated by Pr(Y ≤ 8.5). The addition of 0.5 is the continuity correction; the uncorrected normal approximation gives considerably less accurate results.
This approximation is a huge timesaver (exact calculations with large n are very onerous); historically, it was the first use of the normal distribution, introduced in Abraham de Moivre's book The Doctrine of Chances in 1733. Nowadays, it can be seen as a consequence of the central limit theorem since B(n, p) is a sum of n independent, identically distributed Bernoulli variables with parameter p.
For example, suppose you randomly sample n people out of a large population and ask them whether they agree with a certain statement. The proportion of people who agree will of course depend on the sample. If you sampled groups of n people repeatedly and truly randomly, the proportions would follow an approximate normal distribution with mean equal to the true proportion p of agreement in the population and with standard deviation σ = (p(1 − p)n)^{1/2}. Large sample sizes n are good because the standard deviation, as a proportion of the expected value, gets smaller, which allows a more precise estimate of the unknown parameter p.
The binomial distribution converges towards the Poisson distribution as the number of trials goes to infinity while the product np remains fixed. Therefore the Poisson distribution with parameter λ = np can be used as an approximation to B(n, p) of the binomial distribution if n is sufficiently large and p is sufficiently small. According to two rules of thumb, this approximation is good if n ≥ 20 and p ≤ 0.05, or if n ≥ 100 and np ≤ 10.