Backtracking is a type of algorithm that is a refinement of brute force search. In backtracking, multiple solutions can be eliminated without being explicitly examined, by using specific properties of the problem. It can be a strategy for finding solutions to constraint satisfaction problems. The term "backtrack" was coined by American mathematician D. H. Lehmer in the 1950s.
Constraint satisfaction problems are problems with a complete solution, where the order of elements does not matter. The problems consist of a set of variables each of which must be assigned a value, subject to the particular constraints of the problem. Backtracking attempts to try all the combinations in order to obtain a solution. Its strength is that many implementations avoid trying many partial combinations, thus speeding up the running-time.
Backtracking is closely related to combinatorial search.
This is usually achieved in a recursive function where each instance takes one more variable and alternatively assigns all the available values to it, keeping the one that is consistent with subsequent recursive calls. Backtracking is similar to a depth-first search but uses even less space, keeping just one current solution state and updating it. This pseudocode demonstrates the concept:
function backtrackingSearch()
if all variables are assigned
if the solution is valid
return success and the solution
else
return failure
else
let v be an unassigned variable
for each possible value x of v
v ← x
if backtrackingSearch() succeeds
return success and the solution
unassign v
return failureIn order to speed up the search, when a value is selected, before making the recursive call, the algorithm either deletes that value from conflicting unassigned domains (forward checking) or checks all the constraints to see what other values this newly-assigned value excludes (constraint propagation). This is the most efficient technique for certain problems like 0/1 knapsack and n-queen problem. It gives better results than dynamic programming for these problems.
When choosing which value to assign, many implementations use forward checking to see which value restricts the least number of values, in the anticipation that such a choice is a) more likely to preserve a possible solution and b) a solution has been found when the number of outstanding constraints has been reduced to zero.
Sophisticated backtracking implementations often use a bounding function, which checks whether it is possible to obtain a solution, for the current partial solution. Thus, a bounding test that detects partial solutions that fail can improve search efficiency. Because it is run often, possibly at every step, the computational cost of bounding needs to be minimal, otherwise the overall efficiency of the algorithm is not improved. Effective bounding functions are created in a similar way to other heuristic functions - by relaxing the rules of the problem slightly.
When backtracking is used in a constraint programming language, an added overhead occurs since information about the constraints, used by the constraint solver itself, needs to be updated as well. In these languages, a simple depth-first search is an adequate implementation technique, as used in Planner and Prolog.
In addition to retaining minimal recovery values used in backing up, backtracking implementations commonly keep a variable trail, to record value change history. An efficient implementation will avoid creating a variable trail entry between two successive changes when there is no choice point, as the backtracking will erase all of the changes as a single operation.
An alternative to the variable trail is to keep a time stamp of when the last change was made to the variable. The time stamp is compared to the time stamp of a choice point. If the choice point has an associated time later than that of the variable, it is unnecessary to revert the variable when the choice point is backtracked, as it was changed before the choice point occurred.
Backtracking is also utilized in the (diff) difference engine for the MediaWiki software.