Chebyshev filters are analog or digital filters having a steeper roll-off and more passband ripple (type I) or stopband ripple (type II) than Butterworth filters. Chebyshev filters have the property that they minimize the error between the idealized filter characteristic and the actual over the range of the filter, but with ripples in the passband. This type of filter is named in honor of Pafnuty Chebyshev because their mathematical characteristics are derived from Chebyshev polynomials.
Because of the passband ripple inherent in Chebyshev filters, filters which have a smoother response in the passband but a more irregular response in the stopband are preferred for some applications.
These are the most common Chebyshev filters. The gain (or amplitude) response as a function of angular frequency of the nth order low pass filter is
The passband exhibits equiripple behavior, with the ripple determined by the ripple factor . In the passband, the Chebyshev polynomial alternates between 0 and 1 so the filter gain will alternate between maxima at G=1 and minima at . At the cutoff frequency the gain again has the value but continues to drop into the stop band as the frequency increases. This behavior is shown in the diagram on the right. (note: the common definition of the cutoff frequency to −3 dB does not hold for Chebyshev filters!)
The ripple is often given in dB:
so that a ripple of 3 dB results from .
An even steeper roll-off can be obtained if we allow for ripple in the stop band, by allowing zeroes on the -axis in the complex plane. This will however result in less suppression in the stop band. The result is called an elliptic filter, also known as Cauer filters.
For simplicity, assume that the cutoff frequency is equal to unity. The poles of the gain of the Chebyshev filter will be the zeroes of the denominator of the gain. Using the complex frequency s:
Defining and using the trigonometric definition of the Chebyshev polynomials yields:
where the multiple values of the arc cosine function are made explicit using the integer index m. The poles of the Chebyshev gain function are then:
Using the properties of the trigonometric and hyperbolic functions, this may be written in explicitly complex form:
where m=1,2,...n and
This may be viewed as an equation parametric in and it demonstrates that the poles lie on an ellipse in s-space centered at s=0 with a real semi-axis of length and an imaginary semi-axis of length of
where are only those poles with a negative sign in front of the real term in the above equation for the poles.
The group delay is defined as the derivative of the phase with respect to angular frequency and is a measure of the distortion in the signal introduced by phase differences for different frequencies.
The gain and the group delay for a fifth order type I Chebyshev filter with ε=0.5 are plotted in the graph on the left. It can be seen that there are ripples in the gain and the group delay in the passband but not in the stop band.
Also known as inverse Chebyshev, this type is less common because it does not roll off as fast as type I, and requires more components. It has no ripple in the passband, but does have equiripple in the stopband. The gain is:
In the stop band, the Chebyshev polynomial will oscillate between 0 and 1 so that the gain will oscillate between zero and
For a stopband attenuation of 5dB, ε = 0.6801; for an attenuation of 10dB, ε = 0.3333. The frequency fC = ωC/2 π is the cutoff frequency. The 3dB frequency fH is related to fC by:
Again, assuming that the cutoff frequency is equal to unity, the poles of the gain of the Chebyshev filter will be the zeroes of the denominator of the gain:
The poles of gain of the type II Chebyshev filter will be the inverse of the poles of the type I filter:
where m=1,2,...,n . The zeroes of the type II Chebyshev filter will be the zeroes of the numerator of the gain:
The zeroes of the type II Chebyshev filter will thus be the inverse of the zeroes of the Chebyshev polynomial.
where m=1,2,...,n .
The gain and the group delay for a fifth order type II Chebyshev filter with ε=0.1 are plotted in the graph on the left. It can be seen that there are ripples in the gain in the stop band but not in the pass band.
The calculated Gk values may then be converted into shunt capacitors and top inductors as shown on the right, or they may be converted into top capacitors and shunt inductors.
The resulting circuit is a normalized low-pass filter. Using frequency transformations and impedance scaling, the normalized low-pass filter may be transformed into high-pass, band-pass, and band-stop filters of any desired cutoff frequency or bandwidth.
Wipo Publishes Patent of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (Bmstu), Anatoliy Antonovich Gresyilov for "Method for Determining the Bearings and Amplitude of a Signal from a Source of Radio Waves Using a Direction Finder with Unsynchronized Channels" (Russian Inventor)
Nov 20, 2012; GENEVA, Nov. 20 -- Publication No. WO/2012/154079 was published on Nov. 15. Title of the invention: "METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE...
US Patent Issued to IBM on Oct. 12 for "Lateral Gaze Angle Estimation Using Relative Eye Separation" (New York Inventor)
Oct 13, 2010; ALEXANDRIA, Va., Oct. 13 -- United States Patent no. 7,810,926, issued on Oct. 12, was assigned to IBM Corp. (Armonk, N. Y...
Wipo Publishes Patent of Deere, Jeffrey S. Puhalla and Nikolai R. Tevs for "Method and System for Determining the Tilt of a Vehicle" (American Inventors)
Feb 22, 2013; GENEVA, Feb. 22 -- Publication No. WO/2013/025401 was published on Feb. 21.Title of the invention: "METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR...