DICOM enables the integration of scanners, servers, workstations, printers, and network hardware from multiple manufacturers into a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The different devices come with DICOM conformance statements which clearly state the DICOM classes they support. DICOM has been widely adopted by hospitals and is making inroads in smaller applications like dentists' and doctors' offices.
The DICOM standard is divided into related but independent parts:
The links below are to the 2007 version published in December 2006
In the beginning of the 1980s it was almost impossible for anyone other than manufacturers of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging devices to decode the images that the machines generated. Radiologists wanted to use the images for dose-planning for radiation therapy. ACR and NEMA joined forces and formed a standard committee in 1983. Their first standard, ACR/NEMA 300, was released in 1985. Very soon after its release, it became clear that improvements were needed. The text was vague and had internal contradictions.
In 1988 the second version was released. This version gained more acceptance among vendors. The image transmission was specified as over a dedicated 25 differential (EIA-485) pair cable. The first demonstration of ACR/NEMA V2.0 interconnectivity technology was held at Georgetown University, May 21-23, 1990. Six companies participated in this event, DeJarnette Research Systems, General Electric Medical Systems, Merge Technologies, Siemens Medical Systems, Vortech (acquired by Kodak that same year) and 3M. Commercial equipment supporting ACR/NEMA 2.0 was presented at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in 1990 by these same vendors. Many soon realized that the second version also needed improvement. Several extensions to ACR/NEMA 2.0 were created, like Papyrus (developed by the University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland) and SPI, (Standard Product Interconnect, driven by Siemens Medical Systems and Philips Medical Systems).
The first large scale deployment of ACR/NEMA technology was made in 1992 by the US Army and Air Force as part of the MDIS (Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support)program run out of Ft. Detrick, Maryland. Loral Aerospace and Siemens Medical Systems led a consortium of companies in deploying the first US military PACS (Picture Archiving and Communications System) at all major Army and Air Force medical treatment facilities and teleradiology nodes at a large number of US military clinics. DeJarnette Research Systems and Merge Technologies provided the modality gateway interfaces from third party imaging modalities to the Siemens SPI network. The Veterans Administration and the Navy also purchased systems off this contract.
In 1992 the third version of the standard was released. Its name was then changed to DICOM so as to improve the possibility of international acceptance as a standard. New service classes were defined, network support added and the Conformance Statement was introduced. Officially, the latest version of the standard is still 3.0, however, it has been constantly updated and extended since 1992. Instead of using the version number the standard is often version-numbered using the release year, like "the 2007 version of DICOM".
While the DICOM standard has achieved a near universal level of acceptance amongst medical imaging equipment vendors and healthcare IT organizations, the standard has its limitations. DICOM is a standard directed at addressing technical interoperability issues in medical imaging. It is not a framework or architecture for achieving a useful clinical workflow. RSNA's Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative layered on top of DICOM (and HL-7) provides this final piece of the medical imaging interoperability puzzle.
DICOM differs from other data formats in that it groups information into data sets. That means that a file of a chest X-Ray image, for example, actually contains the patient ID within the file, so that the image can never be separated from this information by mistake.
A DICOM data object consists of a number of attributes, including items such as name, ID, etc., and also one special attribute containing the image pixel data (i.e. logically, the main object has no "header" as such - merely a list of attributes, including the pixel data). A single DICOM object can only contain one attribute containing pixel data. For many modalities, this corresponds to a single image. But note that the attribute may contain multiple "frames", allowing storage of cine loops or other multi-frame data. Another example is NM data, where an NM image by definition is a multi-dimensional multi-frame image. In these cases three- or four-dimensional data can be encapsulated in a single DICOM object. Pixel data can be compressed using a variety of standards, including JPEG, JPEG Lossless, JPEG 2000, and Run-length encoding (RLE). LZW (zip) compression can be used for the whole data set (not just the pixel data) but this is rarely implemented.
DICOM uses three different Data Element encoding schemes. With Explicit VR Data Elements, for VRs that are not OB, OW, OF, SQ, UT, or UN, the format for each Data Element is: GROUP (2 bytes) ELEMENT (2 bytes) VR (2 bytes) LengthInByte (2 bytes) Data (variable length). For the other Explicit Data Elements or Implicit Data Elements, see section 7.1 of Part 5 of the DICOM Standard.
The same basic format is used for all applications, including network and file usage, but when written to a file, usually a true "header" (containing copies of a few key attributes and details of the application which wrote it) is added.
Extracted from Chapter 6.2 of
|FL||Floating Point Single (4 bytes)|
|FD||Floating Point Double (8 bytes)|
|SQ||Sequence of Items|
DICOM consists of many different services, most of which involve transmission of data over a network, and the file format below is a later and relatively minor addition to the standard.
The DICOM Store service is used to send images or other persistent objects (structured reports, etc.) to a PACS or workstation.
The DICOM storage commitment service is used to confirm that an image has been permanently stored by a device (either on redundant disks or on backup media, e.g. burnt to a CD). The Service Class User (SCU - similar to a client), a modality or workstation, etc., uses the confirmation from the Service Class Provider (SCP - similar to a server), an archive station for instance, to make sure that it is safe to delete the images locally.
This enables a workstation to find lists of images or other such objects and then retrieve them from a PACS.
A complementary service to Modality Worklist, this enables the modality to send a report about a performed examination including data about the images acquired, beginning time, end time, and duration of a study, dose delivered, etc. It helps give the radiology department a more precise handle on resource (acquisition station) use. Also known as MPPS, this service allows a modality to better coordinate with image storage servers by giving the server a list of objects to send before or while actually sending such objects.
The DICOM Printing service is used to send images to a DICOM Printer, normally to print an "X-Ray" film. There is a standard calibration (defined in DICOM Part 14) to help ensure consistency between various display devices, including hard copy printout.
The off-line media files correspond to Part 10 of the DICOM standard. It describes how to store medical imaging information on removable media. Except for the data set containing, for example, an image and demography, it's also mandatory to include the File Meta Information.
DICOM restricts the filenames on DICOM media to 8 characters (many people wrongly use 8.3, but this is not legal). No information must be extracted from these names (PS10:188.8.131.52). This is a common source of problems with media created by developers who did not read the specifications carefully. This is a historical requirement to maintain compatibility with older existing systems. It also mandates the presence of a media directory, the DICOMDIR file, that provides index and summary information for all the DICOM files on the media. The DICOMDIR information provides substantially greater information about each file than any filename could, so there is less need for meaningful file names.
DICOM files typically have a .dcm file extension.
The MIME type for DICOM files is defined by RFC 3240 as application/dicom.
There is also an ongoing media exchange test and "connectathon" process for CD media and network operation that is organized by the IHE organization..
|BI||Modality of type Biomagnetic Imaging|
|CD||Modality of type Color Flow Doppler-Retired 2008|
|CR||Modality of type Computed Radiography|
|CT||Modality of type Computed Tomography|
|DD||Modality of type Duplex Doppler-Retired 2008|
|DG||Modality of type Diaphangraphy|
|EC||Modality of type Echo cardiography - Retired|
|EM||Modality of type Electron Microscope|
|ES||Modality of type Endoscopy|
|GM||Modality of type General Microscopy|
|LS||Modality of type Laser Surface Scan|
|MA||Modality of type Magnetic Resonance Angiography - Retired|
|MG||Modality of type Mammography|
|MR||Modality of type Magnetic Resonance|
|MS||Modality of type Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - Retired|
|NM||Modality of type Nuclear Medicine|
|OT||Modality of type Other|
|PT||Modality of type Positron Emission Tomography|
|RF||Modality of type Radio Fluoroscopy|
|RG||Modality of type Radiographic Imaging (conventional film screen)|
|RT||Modality of type Radiation Therapy|
|SC||Modality of type Secondary Capture|
|SM||Modality of type Slide Microscopy|
|ST||Modality of type Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography - Retired 2008|
|TG||Modality of type Thermography|
|US||Modality of type Ultra Sound|
|VL||Modality of type Visible Light|
|XA||Modality of type X-Ray Angiography|
|XC||Modality of type External Camera (Photography)|
Examples of Modalities supported in DICOM are:
Evaluation of small coronary artery aneurysm by 64-slice multi-detector CT coronary angiography and virtual angioscopy/ Kucuk koroner arter anevrizmasinin 64 dedektorlu BT He yapilan koroner anjiyografi ve sanal anjiyoskopi ile degerlendirilmesi.(computed tomography)(Case study)(Brief article)
Oct 01, 2008; A 77-year-old man presented to the cardiology clinic with the complaint of effort-induced chest pain without known ischemic heart...