The Alogi (ἄλογοι, also called "Alogians") were a group of Christian heretics in Asia Minor that flourished around 170 CE. What we know of them is derived from their doctrinal opponents, whose literature is still extant, particularly St. Epiphanius of Salamis. It was Epiphanius who coined the name "Alogi" as a wordplay suggesting that they were both illogical (anti-logikos) and they were against the Christian doctrine of the Logos. “

“St. Epiphanius (Haer. LI) gives a long account of the party of heretics who arose after the Cataphrygians, Quartodecimans, and others, and who received neither the Gospel of St. John nor his Apocalypse.” ; they instead attributed the two New Testament books to the Gnostic Cerinthus, who was actually an enemy of the Apostle.

Regarding their beliefs, Epiphanius asserts that the Alogians denied the continuation of spiritual gifts in the church in opposition to the Montanists. They explicitly deny the Logos doctrine in John chapter 1 and they deny Johannine authorship by comparing his Gospel with the synoptic Gospels. Their comparative method was considered very foolish in Epiphanius’ opinion who derided them as "stupid". Epiphanius argues that Cerinthus could not have written the Gospel of John because whereas Cerinthus denied the deity of Christ, the Gospel taught Christ’s Godhead. Epiphanius contemplates that they may not reject Christ’s deity outright, but instead just the “Logos form from which the doctrine is presented in the Gospel.” He therefore is not so much concerned with their Christology as much as he is concerned with their biblical criticism. Nevertheless Epiphanius is harsh in his condemnation of them and asserts that the bottom line for the Alogi is that they deny the Gospel of John and consequently the Word-Flesh Logos doctrine. In Epiphanius, they are clearly distinguished from the Ebionites, and from the Docetists. Some have doubted their existence because of Epiphanius' seeming ability to exaggerate or multiply heresies. Robertroberg (Robertroberg) 00:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Because someone differs from the traditional view does not make him or her a heretic. It's a highly subjective and offensive word. Nowhere in the text of John 1 does it say Jesus (Yahshuah) is the logos. That is the popular belief, but popularity does not mean it is true. Robertroberg (Robertroberg) 00:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)



  • Bludau, A. Die Ersten Gegner der Johannes-Schriften (Biblische Studien, 22, Hefte1 and 2; 1925).
  • Fisher, G. P. Some Remarks on the Alogi in Papers of the American Society of Church History, Vol. 2, Part 1, pp. 1-9 New York, 1890.
  • Hall, S. G. in Theologische Realenzyklopadia 2. Edited by G. Krause, G. Muller, et al. Berlin: 1977ff., 290-95 (see “Aloger”).
  • The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Book II and III, Translated by Frank Williams. Leiden: Brill, 1997. ISBN 90-04-09898-4.
  • Rose, V. “Question Johannine. Les Aloges asiatiques et les aloges romains,” Revue Biblique 6 (1897): 516-34.

External links

Search another word or see alogion Dictionary | Thesaurus |Spanish
Copyright © 2015, LLC. All rights reserved.
  • Please Login or Sign Up to use the Recent Searches feature