The following is a list of all powerful numbers between 1 and 1000:
If m = a2b3, then every prime in the prime factorization of a appears in the prime factorization of m with an exponent of at least two, and every prime in the prime factorization of b appears in the prime factorization of m with an exponent of at least three; therefore, m is powerful.
In the other direction, suppose that m is powerful, with prime factorization
The representation m = a2b3 calculated in this way has the property that b is squarefree, and is uniquely defined by this property.
The sum of reciprocals of powerful numbers converges to
where p runs over all primes, ζ(s) denotes the Riemann zeta function, and ζ(3) is Apéry's constant (Golomb, 1970).
Let k(x) denote the number of powerful numbers in the interval [1,x]. Then k(x) is proportional to the square root of x. More precisely,
(Golomb, 1970).
The sequence of pairs of consecutive powerful numbers is given by . The two smallest consecutive powerful numbers are 8 and 9. Since Pell's equation x2 − 8y2 = 1 has infinitely many integral solutions, there are infinitely many pairs of consecutive powerful numbers (Golomb, 1970); more generally, one can find consecutive powerful numbers by solving a similar Pell equation x2 − ny2 = ±1 for any perfect cube n. However, one of the two powerful numbers in a pair formed in this way must be a square. According to Guy, Erdős has asked whether there are infinitely many pairs of consecutive powerful numbers such as (233, 2332132) in which neither number in the pair is a square. Jaroslaw Wroblewski showed that there are indeed infinitely many such pairs by showing that 33c2+1=73d2 has infinitely many solutions. It is a conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that there are no three consecutive powerful numbers.
Any odd number is a difference of two consecutive squares: 2k + 1 = (k + 1)2 - k2. Similarly, any multiple of four is a difference of the squares of two numbers that differ by two. However, a singly even number, that is, a number divisible by two but not by four, cannot be expressed as a difference of squares. This motivates the question of determining which singly even numbers can be expressed as differences of powerful numbers. Golomb exhibited some representations of this type:
It had been conjectured that 6 cannot be so represented, and Golomb conjectured that there are infinitely many integers which cannot be represented as a difference between two powerful numbers. However, Narkiewicz showed that 6 can be so represented in infinitely many ways such as
and McDaniel showed that every integer has infinitely many such representations(McDaniel, 1982).
Erdős conjectured that every sufficiently large integer is a sum of at most three powerful numbers; this was proved by Roger Heath-Brown (1987).
More generally, we can consider the integers all of whose prime factors have exponents at least k. Such an integer is called a k-powerful number, k-ful number, or k-full number.
are k-powerful numbers in an arithmetic progression. Moreover, if a1, a2, ..., as are k-powerful in an arithmetic progression with common difference d, then
are s + 1 k-powerful numbers in an arithmetic progression.
We have an identity involving k-powerful numbers:
This gives infinitely many l+1-tuples of k-powerful numbers whose sum is also k-powerful. Nitaj shows there are infinitely many solutions of x+y=z in relatively prime 3-powerful numbers(Nitaj, 1995). Cohn constructs an infinite family of solutions of x+y=z in relatively prime non-cube 3-powerful numbers as follows: the triplet
is a solution of the equation 32X3 + 49Y3 = 81Z3. We can construct another solution by setting X′ = X(49Y3 + 81Z3), Y′ = −Y(32X3 + 81Z3), Z′ = Z(32X3 − 49Y3) and omitting the common divisor.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*